Chen De-Jian, Yao Cong, Song Quanwei, Tang Benyu, Liu Xuqiang, Zhang Bin, Dai Min, Nie Tao, Wan Zongmiao
Department of Orthopedics, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
Department of Orthopedics, First Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.
World Neurosurg. 2018 Jul;115:e516-e522. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.04.085. Epub 2018 Apr 25.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical and radiographic results of unilateral pedicle screw fixation (UPSF) and bilateral pedicle screw fixation (BPSF) after unilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disc diseases (DDDs). METHODS: A total of 63 patients who underwent UPSF or BPSF combined with unilateral TLIF at L4-L5 or L5-S1 in our hospital between 2014 and 2016 were included in this analysis. The perioperative outcomes and radiographic results were recorded at preoperative and postoperative follow-up. Fusion rates were determined according to the Bridwell-Lenke grading system. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the visual analog scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and lumbar Japanese Orthopedic Association score. RESULTS: According to the perioperative assessment, the duration of operation, intraoperative and postoperative blood loss, duration of pain medication use, and hospital costs were significantly (P < 0.0001) lower in the UPSF group compared with the BPSF group. After a mean follow-up of 24 months, both the UPSF and BPSF groups showed significantly (P < 0.05) maintained disc height and segmental lordosis of the surgical segment and achieved similar clinical outcomes at the final postoperative follow-up. The impact on the cranial adjacent vertebral level was significantly (P < 0.05) less in the UPSF group than the BPSF group in the short term. CONCLUSIONS: UPSF techniques with TLIF can attain similar clinical efficiency as BPSF techniques in treating single-level low lumbar DDD, but with fewer surgical injuries and at lower cost. BPSF with TLIF likely causes more degeneration at the cranial adjacent segment compared with UPSF techniques. The long-term results require more study.
目的:比较单侧经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(TLIF)治疗腰椎退行性椎间盘疾病(DDD)后单侧椎弓根螺钉固定(UPSF)与双侧椎弓根螺钉固定(BPSF)的临床和影像学结果。 方法:本分析纳入了2014年至2016年期间在我院接受UPSF或BPSF联合单侧L4-L5或L5-S1 TLIF手术的63例患者。记录术前和术后随访时的围手术期结果和影像学结果。根据Bridwell-Lenke分级系统确定融合率。使用视觉模拟量表、Oswestry功能障碍指数和腰椎日本骨科协会评分评估临床结果。 结果:根据围手术期评估,与BPSF组相比,UPSF组的手术时间、术中及术后失血量、止痛药物使用时间和住院费用显著降低(P < 0.0001)。平均随访24个月后,UPSF组和BPSF组的手术节段椎间盘高度和节段前凸均显著维持(P < 0.05),且在术后最终随访时临床结果相似。短期内,UPSF组对上位相邻椎体节段的影响显著小于BPSF组(P < 0.05)。 结论:TLIF联合UPSF技术在治疗单节段低位腰椎DDD方面可获得与BPSF技术相似的临床疗效,但手术创伤更小、成本更低。与UPSF技术相比,TLIF联合BPSF可能导致上位相邻节段更多退变。长期结果需要更多研究。
Bioengineering (Basel). 2023-10-16