Suppr超能文献

预测下腰痛患者通过普拉提练习难度等级的因素:一项随机对照试验的二次分析。

Predictive factors for progression through the difficulty levels of Pilates exercises in patients with low back pain: a secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

机构信息

Master's and Doctoral Program in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo (UNICID), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

Master's and Doctoral Program in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de São Paulo (UNICID), São Paulo, SP, Brazil.

出版信息

Braz J Phys Ther. 2018 Nov-Dec;22(6):512-518. doi: 10.1016/j.bjpt.2018.04.004. Epub 2018 Apr 17.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The progression through the difficulty levels of Pilates exercises is a subjective criterion, that depends on the therapist's experience and ability to identify the best moment to progress to the next level.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the factors that interfere in the progression through the difficulty levels of the Pilates exercises in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain.

METHODS

Data from 139 patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain from a randomized controlled trial were used for statistical analysis using binary logistic regression. The dependent variable was the progression through the difficulty levels, and the independent variables were age, gender, educational level, low back pain duration, pain intensity, general disability, kinesiophobia, previous physical activity, and number of absences.

RESULTS

The factors that interfered in the progression through the difficulty levels were previous physical inactivity (odds ratio [OR]=5.14, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.53-17.31), low educational level (OR=2.62, 95% CI: 1.12-6.10), more advanced age (OR=0.95, 95% CI: 0.92-0.98) and more absences (OR=0.63, 95% CI: 0.50-0.79). These variables explain 41% of the non-progression through the difficulty level of the exercises.

CONCLUSION

Physical inactivity, low educational level, more advanced age and greater number of absences can be interfering factors in the progression through the difficulty levels of the Pilates exercises in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain.

摘要

背景

普拉提练习难度级别的进展是一个主观标准,取决于治疗师的经验和能力,以确定进展到下一个难度级别的最佳时机。

目的

确定干扰慢性非特异性下腰痛患者进行普拉提练习难度级别进展的因素。

方法

使用二元逻辑回归对来自一项随机对照试验的 139 名慢性非特异性下腰痛患者的数据进行统计分析。因变量为难度级别进展,自变量为年龄、性别、教育程度、下腰痛持续时间、疼痛强度、一般残疾、运动恐惧、以前的身体活动和缺勤次数。

结果

干扰难度级别进展的因素有以前的身体不活动(比值比 [OR]=5.14,95%置信区间 [CI]:1.53-17.31)、教育程度低(OR=2.62,95% CI:1.12-6.10)、年龄较大(OR=0.95,95% CI:0.92-0.98)和缺勤较多(OR=0.63,95% CI:0.50-0.79)。这些变量解释了练习难度级别进展不顺利的 41%。

结论

身体不活动、教育程度低、年龄较大和缺勤较多可能是慢性非特异性下腰痛患者进行普拉提练习难度级别进展的干扰因素。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

2
Low back pain: a call for action.下背痛:行动的呼吁。
Lancet. 2018 Jun 9;391(10137):2384-2388. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)30488-4. Epub 2018 Mar 21.
6
Pilates for low back pain.普拉提疗法缓解腰痛。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jul 2;2015(7):CD010265. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010265.pub2.
7
The number of subjects per variable required in linear regression analyses.线性回归分析中每个变量所需的样本量。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2015 Jun;68(6):627-36. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2014.12.014. Epub 2015 Jan 22.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验