• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[家政工人的皮肤病:伦巴第地区的经验]

[Dermatopathies in the domestic worker: the Lombard experience].

作者信息

Nava C, Beretta E, Brambilla G, Campiglio R, Moroni P, Veneroni C, Zerboni R, Grieco A

机构信息

Istituto di Medicina del Lavoro dell'Università degli Studi di Milano Clinica del Lavoro L. Devoto.

出版信息

G Ital Med Lav. 1986 Sep-Nov;8(5-6):211-4.

PMID:2970414
Abstract

In order to identify the etiopathogenesis of cutaneous diseases in housewives, a questionnaire was made, and the gathered data are here described. 1,824 people have answered this questionnaire: 1,007 have reported lesions with a suspicious immunological pathogenesis. The commercial products which were reported as a cause of the dermatitis have been 834. In a group of 142 housewives (86 with allergic contact dermatitis and 56 with irritative contact dermatitis), the allergic sensitizations to the chemicals in the detergents were tested. 21% of the cases had positive cutaneous reactions for nickel salts and 8.4% for chromium salts. The analysis in atomic absorption method of these metals in 34 commercial products has shown their presence in almost all the samples. Hypothesis are formulated to find the source of these polluting substances. The aims and the methods of a investigation carried out on 1.800 housewives, who are going to be controlled in order to estimate the prevalence, the clinical kinds and the etiopathogenesis of dermatitis related to house work, are described. The study will be carried out at the Occupational Health Institute "Clinica del Lavoro L. Devoto" of Milan and at the Dermatological Departments of the Universities of Bari and Florence.

摘要

为了确定家庭主妇皮肤疾病的病因,我们设计了一份问卷,并在此描述收集到的数据。1824人回答了这份问卷:其中1007人报告有可疑免疫发病机制的病变。被报告为皮炎病因的商业产品有834种。在一组142名家庭主妇中(86名患有过敏性接触性皮炎,56名患有刺激性接触性皮炎),对洗涤剂中的化学物质进行了过敏致敏测试。21%的病例对镍盐有阳性皮肤反应,8.4%的病例对铬盐有阳性皮肤反应。对34种商业产品中这些金属的原子吸收法分析表明,几乎所有样品中都有这些金属。我们提出了一些假设来寻找这些污染物质的来源。本文描述了对1800名家庭主妇进行调查的目的和方法,这些家庭主妇将接受检查,以评估与家务劳动相关的皮炎的患病率、临床类型和病因。该研究将在米兰的职业健康研究所“Clinica del Lavoro L. Devoto”以及巴里大学和佛罗伦萨大学的皮肤科进行。

相似文献

1
[Dermatopathies in the domestic worker: the Lombard experience].[家政工人的皮肤病:伦巴第地区的经验]
G Ital Med Lav. 1986 Sep-Nov;8(5-6):211-4.
2
[Contact dermatitis of the hands in housewives: preliminary data of a multicenter study].[家庭主妇手部接触性皮炎:一项多中心研究的初步数据]
G Ital Med Lav. 1989 May-Jul;11(3-4):109-12.
3
Epidemiological survey of contact dermatitis in Italy (1984-1993) by GIRDCA (Gruppo Italiano Ricerca Dermatiti da Contatto e Ambientali).意大利接触性皮炎流行病学调查(1984 - 1993年),由意大利接触性和环境性皮炎研究小组(GIRDCA)开展
Am J Contact Dermat. 1999 Mar;10(1):18-30.
4
[Clinico-statistical investigation about cement dermatitis in Italy].[关于意大利水泥性皮炎的临床统计调查]
G Ital Med Lav. 1996 Jan-May;18(1-3):87-96.
5
Occupational chromate allergy in Singapore: a study of 87 patients and a review from 1983 to 1995.新加坡职业性铬酸盐过敏:87例患者的研究及1983年至1995年的综述
Am J Contact Dermat. 1998 Mar;9(1):1-5.
6
Relationship of occupation to contact dermatitis: evaluation in patients tested from 1998 to 2000.职业与接触性皮炎的关系:对1998年至2000年接受检测患者的评估
Am J Contact Dermat. 2002 Dec;13(4):170-6. doi: 10.1053/ajcd.2002.36635.
7
[Dermatopathies in those engaged in domestic work and related risks].[从事家务劳动人员的皮肤病及相关风险]
G Ital Med Lav. 1986 Sep-Nov;8(5-6):215-9.
8
Incidence rates of occupational allergic contact dermatitis caused by metals.金属引起的职业性过敏性接触性皮炎的发病率
Am J Contact Dermat. 2000 Sep;11(3):155-60. doi: 10.1053/ajcd.2000.7186.
9
[Occupational contact dermatitis: analysis of clinical case reports, 1972-1985].
G Ital Med Lav. 1987 Jan;9(1):25-9.
10
A preliminary report of the occupation of patients evaluated in patch test clinics.斑贴试验诊所评估患者职业的初步报告。
Am J Contact Dermat. 2001 Jun;12(2):72-6. doi: 10.1053/ajcd.2001.19630.