Fliesser Michael, De Witt Huberts Jessie, Wippert Pia-Maria
Department of Health and Physical Activity, Sociology of Health and Physical Activity, University of Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.
BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 28;8(4):e020207. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020207.
To investigate associations between socioeconomic status (SES) indicators (education, job position, income, multidimensional index) and the genesis of chronic low back pain (CLBP).
Longitudinal field study (baseline and 6-month follow-up).
Four medical clinics across Germany.
352 people were included according to the following criteria: (1) between 18 and 65 years of age, (2) intermittent pain and (3) an understanding of the study and the ability to answer a questionnaire without help. Exclusion criteria were: (1) pregnancy, (2) inability to stand upright, (3) inability to give sick leave information, (4) signs of serious spinal pathology, (5) acute pain in the past 7 days or (6) an incomplete SES indicators questionnaire.
Subjective intensity and disability of CLBP.
Analysis showed that job position was the best single predictor of CLBP intensity, followed by a multidimensional index. Education and income had no significant association with intensity. Subjective disability was best predicted by job position, succeeded by the multidimensional index and education, while income again had no significant association.
The results showed that SES indicators have different strong associations with the genesis of CLBP and should therefore not be used interchangeably. Job position was found to be the single most important indicator. These results could be helpful in the planning of back pain care programmes, but in general, more research on the relationship between SES and health outcomes is needed.
探讨社会经济地位(SES)指标(教育程度、工作职位、收入、多维指数)与慢性下腰痛(CLBP)发生之间的关联。
纵向实地研究(基线和6个月随访)。
德国各地的四家诊所。
352人符合以下标准被纳入研究:(1)年龄在18至65岁之间,(2)间歇性疼痛,(3)理解研究内容且能独立回答问卷。排除标准为:(1)怀孕,(2)无法直立,(3)无法提供病假信息,(4)严重脊柱病变体征,(5)过去7天内有急性疼痛,(6)SES指标问卷不完整。
CLBP的主观强度和功能障碍。
分析表明,工作职位是CLBP强度的最佳单一预测因素,其次是多维指数。教育程度和收入与强度无显著关联。工作职位对主观功能障碍的预测效果最佳,其次是多维指数和教育程度,而收入再次与之无显著关联。
结果表明,SES指标与CLBP的发生有不同程度的强关联,因此不应相互替代使用。工作职位是最重要的单一指标。这些结果可能有助于背痛护理项目的规划,但总体而言,需要更多关于SES与健康结果之间关系的研究。