University of Maryland, Baltimore County, United States.
University of Maryland, Baltimore County, United States.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2018 Jun;89:11-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2018.03.004. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
This study examined the efficacy of brief alcohol intervention in the context of community-based treatment for partner violence. In a randomized clinical trial, 228 partner-violent men with hazardous or problem drinking were recruited at three Intimate Partner Violence (IPV) treatment agencies and randomly assigned to receive one of two 4-session alcohol interventions: Motivational Enhancement Therapy (MET: N = 110) or Alcohol Education (AE: N = 118). After completing alcohol intervention, participants received standard agency counseling services for IPV. Participants completed assessments of alcohol use, drug use, and IPV at pre-treatment, post-alcohol intervention, and quarterly follow-ups for 12 months. At the end of the 4-session alcohol intervention, MET participants displayed greater acknowledgment of problems with alcohol than AE participants (Partial ή = 0.039, p = 0.006). Significant changes from baseline across treatment conditions (at p < 0.001) were observed for percent days of alcohol abstinence [95% empirical CI for Partial ή =0.226, 0.296], heavy drinking [0.292, 0.349], illicit drug use [0.096, 0.156] and partner violence [0.282, 0.334]. No significant condition differences (treatment by time interactions) were found for alcohol abstinence [95% empirical CI for Partial ή = 0.007, 0.036], heavy drinking [0.016, 0.055], illicit drug use [0.005, 0.035] or partner violence [0.001, 0.004]. Results encourage continued use of brief alcohol interventions in community IPV services, but do not provide evidence of a unique benefit of MET in reducing alcohol use in this population.
这项研究考察了在社区为伴侣暴力提供的治疗背景下,简短的酒精干预的效果。在一项随机临床试验中,在三个亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)治疗机构招募了 228 名有危险或有问题饮酒的伴侣暴力男性,并随机分配接受两种为期 4 节的酒精干预之一:动机增强治疗(MET:N=110)或酒精教育(AE:N=118)。完成酒精干预后,参与者接受了 IPV 的标准机构咨询服务。参与者在治疗前、酒精干预后和 12 个月的季度随访中完成了酒精使用、药物使用和 IPV 的评估。在 4 节酒精干预结束时,MET 参与者比 AE 参与者更承认酒精问题(部分 η=0.039,p=0.006)。在治疗条件下,从基线开始观察到显著变化(p<0.001),包括酒精禁欲天数的百分比[95%经验 CI 部分 η=0.226,0.296]、重度饮酒[0.292,0.349]、非法药物使用[0.096,0.156]和伴侣暴力[0.282,0.334]。在酒精禁欲[95%经验 CI 部分 η=0.007,0.036]、重度饮酒[0.016,0.055]、非法药物使用[0.005,0.035]或伴侣暴力[0.001,0.004]方面,没有发现条件差异(治疗与时间的相互作用)。结果鼓励在社区 IPV 服务中继续使用简短的酒精干预,但没有提供 MET 在减少该人群酒精使用方面具有独特益处的证据。