Suppr超能文献

个体与团体认知行为疗法对有伴侣暴力行为的男性:一项初步的随机试验。

Individual Versus Group Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Partner-Violent Men: A Preliminary Randomized Trial.

机构信息

University of Maryland, Baltimore County, USA.

Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN, USA.

出版信息

J Interpers Violence. 2020 Aug;35(15-16):2846-2868. doi: 10.1177/0886260517705666. Epub 2017 Apr 24.

Abstract

A randomized clinical trial tested the hypothesis that a flexible, case formulation-based, individual treatment approach integrating motivational interviewing strategies with cognitive-behavioral therapy (ICBT) is more efficacious than a standardized group cognitive-behavioral approach (GCBT) for perpetrators of intimate partner violence (IPV). Forty-two men presenting for services at a community domestic violence agency were randomized to receive 20 sessions of ICBT or a 20-week group cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) program. Participants and their relationship partners completed assessments of relationship abuse and relationship functioning at baseline and quarterly follow-ups for 1 year. Treatment uptake and session attendance were significantly higher in ICBT than GCBT. However, contrary to the study hypothesis, GCBT produced consistently equivalent or greater benefits than ICBT. Participant self-reports revealed significant reductions in abusive behavior and injuries across conditions with no differential benefits between conditions. Victim partner reports revealed more favorable outcomes for group treatment, including a statistically significant difference in psychological aggression, and differences exceeding a medium effect size for physical assault, emotional abuse, and partner relationship adjustment. In response to hypothetical relationship scenarios, GCBT was associated with greater reductions than ICBT (exceeding a medium effect) in articulated cognitive distortions and aggressive intentions. Treatment competence ratings suggest that flexible, individualized administration of CBT creates challenges in session agenda setting, homework implementation, and formal aspects of relationship skills training. Although caution is needed in generalizing findings from this small-scale trial, the results suggest that the mutual support and positive social influence available in group intervention may be particularly helpful for IPV perpetrators.

摘要

一项随机临床试验检验了这样一个假设,即一种灵活的、基于病例形成的、个体治疗方法,将动机访谈策略与认知行为疗法(ICBT)整合在一起,对于亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)的施害者来说,比标准化的团体认知行为疗法(GCBT)更有效。42 名在社区家庭暴力机构寻求服务的男性被随机分配接受 20 节 ICBT 或 20 周的团体认知行为疗法(CBT)方案。参与者及其关系伴侣在基线和 1 年的季度随访中完成了对关系虐待和关系功能的评估。与 GCBT 相比,ICBT 的治疗参与率和疗程出席率显著更高。然而,与研究假设相反,GCBT 产生了与 ICBT 相当或更大的益处。参与者的自我报告显示,在所有条件下,虐待行为和伤害都有显著减少,而且在条件之间没有差异。受害者伴侣的报告显示,团体治疗有更有利的结果,包括在心理攻击方面有统计学上的显著差异,以及在身体攻击、情感虐待和伴侣关系调整方面的差异超过中等效应量。在对假设的关系情景的反应中,GCBT 与 ICBT 相比(超过中等效应),在表达的认知扭曲和攻击意图方面的减少更大。治疗能力评估表明,CBT 的灵活、个体化管理在课程议程设置、家庭作业实施和关系技能培训的正式方面带来了挑战。尽管需要谨慎地从这个小规模试验中推广发现,但结果表明,团体干预中提供的相互支持和积极的社会影响可能对 IPV 施害者特别有帮助。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验