• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Estimating Individual Treatment Effect in Observational Data Using Random Forest Methods.使用随机森林方法估计观察性数据中的个体治疗效果。
J Comput Graph Stat. 2018;27(1):209-219. doi: 10.1080/10618600.2017.1356325. Epub 2018 Feb 1.
2
Estimating Counterfactual Treatment Outcomes Over Time in Complex Multiagent Scenarios.复杂多智能体场景中随时间推移估计反事实治疗结果
IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. 2025 Feb;36(2):2103-2117. doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2024.3361166. Epub 2025 Feb 6.
3
The productivity of mental health care: an instrumental variable approach.精神卫生保健的生产力:一种工具变量法。
J Ment Health Policy Econ. 1999 Jun 1;2(2):59-71. doi: 10.1002/(sici)1099-176x(199906)2:2<59::aid-mhp47>3.0.co;2-j.
4
Estimating the Individual Treatment Effect on Survival Time Based on Prior Knowledge and Counterfactual Prediction.基于先验知识和反事实预测估计个体治疗对生存时间的影响。
Entropy (Basel). 2022 Jul 14;24(7):975. doi: 10.3390/e24070975.
5
Selection criteria and generalizability within the counterfactual framework: explaining the paradox of antidepressant-induced suicidality?反事实框架内的选择标准与可推广性:解释抗抑郁药诱发自杀行为的悖论?
Clin Trials. 2009 Apr;6(2):109-18. doi: 10.1177/1740774509102563.
6
Causal Optimal Transport for Treatment Effect Estimation.用于治疗效果估计的因果最优传输
IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst. 2023 Aug;34(8):4083-4095. doi: 10.1109/TNNLS.2021.3118542. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
7
Heterogeneous treatment effect estimation for observational data using model-based forests.基于模型森林的观察性数据异质处理效应估计。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2024 Mar;33(3):392-413. doi: 10.1177/09622802231224628. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
8
[Estimation on the individual treatment effect among heterogeneous population, using the Causal Forests method].[使用因果森林方法对异质人群中的个体治疗效果进行估计]
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2019 Jun 10;40(6):707-712. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0254-6450.2019.06.020.
9
Controlling for confounding via propensity score methods can result in biased estimation of the conditional AUC: A simulation study.通过倾向得分方法控制混杂因素可能会导致条件AUC的估计出现偏差:一项模拟研究。
Pharm Stat. 2019 Oct;18(5):568-582. doi: 10.1002/pst.1948. Epub 2019 May 20.
10
Comparison of random forest methods for conditional average treatment effect estimation with a continuous treatment.连续型处理下条件平均处理效应估计的随机森林方法比较。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2024 Nov;33(11-12):1952-1966. doi: 10.1177/09622802241275401. Epub 2024 Oct 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Precision ecology for targeted conservation action.用于针对性保护行动的精准生态学。
Nat Ecol Evol. 2025 May 28. doi: 10.1038/s41559-025-02733-4.
2
Extended fiducial inference for individual treatment effects via deep neural networks.通过深度神经网络进行个体治疗效果的扩展基准推断。
Stat Comput. 2025;35(4):97. doi: 10.1007/s11222-025-10624-8. Epub 2025 May 17.
3
SPRINT Treatment Among Adults With Chronic Kidney Disease From 2 Large Health Care Systems.来自2个大型医疗保健系统的慢性肾病成人患者的强化血压干预治疗(SPRINT)
JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jan 2;8(1):e2453458. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.53458.
4
Adjuvant Therapy after Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer: Who Needs It?: Multi-institution Worldwide Observational Study.食管癌切除术后的辅助治疗:谁需要它?全球多机构观察性研究
Ann Surg Open. 2024 Oct 15;5(4):e497. doi: 10.1097/AS9.0000000000000497. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
Machine Learning Methods to Estimate Individualized Treatment Effects for Use in Health Technology Assessment.机器学习方法用于估计个体化治疗效果在卫生技术评估中的应用。
Med Decis Making. 2024 Oct;44(7):756-769. doi: 10.1177/0272989X241263356. Epub 2024 Jul 26.
6
Interpretable artificial intelligence to optimise use of imatinib after resection in patients with localised gastrointestinal stromal tumours: an observational cohort study.可解释人工智能优化胃肠道间质瘤局部切除术后伊马替尼的应用:一项观察性队列研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2024 Aug;25(8):1025-1037. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00259-6. Epub 2024 Jul 5.
7
Heterogeneous treatment effect estimation for observational data using model-based forests.基于模型森林的观察性数据异质处理效应估计。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2024 Mar;33(3):392-413. doi: 10.1177/09622802231224628. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
8
Assessing the Most Vulnerable Subgroup to Type II Diabetes Associated with Statin Usage: Evidence from Electronic Health Record Data.评估他汀类药物使用相关的II型糖尿病最脆弱亚组:来自电子健康记录数据的证据。
J Am Stat Assoc. 2023;118(543):1488-1499. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2022.2157727. Epub 2023 Jan 20.
9
A new method for clustered survival data: Estimation of treatment effect heterogeneity and variable selection.一种新的聚类生存数据分析方法:处理效应异质性估计和变量选择。
Biom J. 2024 Jan;66(1):e2200178. doi: 10.1002/bimj.202200178. Epub 2023 Dec 10.
10
Causal AI with Real World Data: Do Statins Protect from Alzheimer's Disease Onset?基于真实世界数据的因果人工智能:他汀类药物能预防阿尔茨海默病的发病吗?
ICMHI 2021 (2021). 2021 May;2021:296-303. doi: 10.1145/3472813.3473206. Epub 2021 Oct 26.

本文引用的文献

1
Random Forest Missing Data Algorithms.随机森林缺失数据算法
Stat Anal Data Min. 2017 Dec;10(6):363-377. doi: 10.1002/sam.11348. Epub 2017 Jun 13.
2
Identification of predicted individual treatment effects in randomized clinical trials.随机临床试验中预测个体治疗效果的识别。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2018 Jan;27(1):142-157. doi: 10.1177/0962280215623981. Epub 2016 Mar 17.
3
Self-Reported HIV and HCV Screening Rates and Serostatus Among Substance Abuse Treatment Patients.物质滥用治疗患者的自我报告HIV和HCV筛查率及血清学状态
AIDS Behav. 2016 Jan;20(1):204-14. doi: 10.1007/s10461-015-1074-2.
4
Penalized regression procedures for variable selection in the potential outcomes framework.潜在结果框架中用于变量选择的惩罚回归方法。
Stat Med. 2015 May 10;34(10):1645-58. doi: 10.1002/sim.6433. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
5
Synthetic learning machines.合成学习机器
BioData Min. 2014 Dec 18;7(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s13040-014-0028-y. eCollection 2014.
6
Risk estimation using probability machines.使用概率机进行风险估计。
BioData Min. 2014 Mar 1;7(1):2. doi: 10.1186/1756-0381-7-2.
7
Effect of risk-reduction counseling with rapid HIV testing on risk of acquiring sexually transmitted infections: the AWARE randomized clinical trial.风险降低咨询联合快速 HIV 检测对性传播感染风险的影响:AWARE 随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2013 Oct 23;310(16):1701-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.280034.
8
Subgroup identification from randomized clinical trial data.随机临床试验数据中的亚组识别。
Stat Med. 2011 Oct 30;30(24):2867-80. doi: 10.1002/sim.4322. Epub 2011 Aug 4.
9
Improving propensity score weighting using machine learning.使用机器学习改进倾向评分加权。
Stat Med. 2010 Feb 10;29(3):337-46. doi: 10.1002/sim.3782.
10
Scientific evidence underlying the ACC/AHA clinical practice guidelines.美国心脏病学会/美国心脏协会临床实践指南的科学依据。
JAMA. 2009 Feb 25;301(8):831-41. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.205.

使用随机森林方法估计观察性数据中的个体治疗效果。

Estimating Individual Treatment Effect in Observational Data Using Random Forest Methods.

作者信息

Lu Min, Sadiq Saad, Feaster Daniel J, Ishwaran Hemant

机构信息

Division of Biostatistics, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL.

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Miami, Coral Gables, FL.

出版信息

J Comput Graph Stat. 2018;27(1):209-219. doi: 10.1080/10618600.2017.1356325. Epub 2018 Feb 1.

DOI:10.1080/10618600.2017.1356325
PMID:29706752
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5920646/
Abstract

Estimation of individual treatment effect in observational data is complicated due to the challenges of confounding and selection bias. A useful inferential framework to address this is the counterfactual (potential outcomes) model, which takes the hypothetical stance of asking what if an individual had received treatments. Making use of random forests (RF) within the counterfactual framework we estimate individual treatment effects by directly modeling the response. We find that accurate estimation of individual treatment effects is possible even in complex heterogenous settings but that the type of RF approach plays an important role in accuracy. Methods designed to be adaptive to confounding, when used in parallel with out-of-sample estimation, do best. One method found to be especially promising is counterfactual synthetic forests. We illustrate this new methodology by applying it to a large comparative effectiveness trial, Project Aware, to explore the role drug use plays in sexual risk. The analysis reveals important connections between risky behavior, drug usage, and sexual risk.

摘要

由于混杂因素和选择偏倚的挑战,在观察性数据中估计个体治疗效果很复杂。解决此问题的一个有用的推理框架是反事实(潜在结果)模型,该模型采取假设的立场,即询问如果个体接受了治疗会怎样。在反事实框架内利用随机森林(RF),我们通过直接对反应进行建模来估计个体治疗效果。我们发现,即使在复杂的异质环境中,准确估计个体治疗效果也是可能的,但RF方法的类型在准确性方面起着重要作用。设计为适应混杂因素的方法,与样本外估计并行使用时效果最佳。一种特别有前景的方法是反事实合成森林。我们通过将这种新方法应用于一项大型比较效果试验“清醒计划”,以探索药物使用在性风险中所起的作用,来说明这种新方法。分析揭示了危险行为、药物使用和性风险之间的重要联系。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ab4/5920646/894007275d65/nihms959091f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ab4/5920646/3f55da069cc1/nihms959091f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ab4/5920646/6c989b55a05e/nihms959091f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ab4/5920646/894007275d65/nihms959091f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ab4/5920646/3f55da069cc1/nihms959091f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ab4/5920646/6c989b55a05e/nihms959091f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7ab4/5920646/894007275d65/nihms959091f3.jpg