Bilbao Aivett, Gibbons Bryson C, Slysz Gordon W, Crowell Kevin L, Monroe Matthew E, Ibrahim Yehia M, Smith Richard D, Payne Samuel H, Baker Erin S
Earth and Biological Sciences Directorate, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, USA.
Int J Mass Spectrom. 2018 Apr;427:91-99. doi: 10.1016/j.ijms.2017.11.003. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
The mass accuracy and peak intensity of ions detected by mass spectrometry (MS) measurements are essential to facilitate compound identification and quantitation. However, high concentration species can yield erroneous results if their ion intensities reach beyond the limits of the detection system, leading to distorted and non-ideal detector response (e.g. saturation), and largely precluding the calculation of accurate and intensity values. Here we present an open source computational method to correct peaks above a defined intensity (saturated) threshold determined by the MS instrumentation such as the analog-to-digital converters or time-to-digital converters used in conjunction with time-of-flight MS. In this method, the isotopic envelope for each observed ion above the saturation threshold is compared to its expected theoretical isotopic distribution. The most intense isotopic peak for which saturation does not occur is then utilized to re-calculate the precursor and correct the intensity, resulting in both higher mass accuracy and greater dynamic range. The benefits of this approach were evaluated with proteomic and lipidomic datasets of varying complexities. After correcting the high concentration species, reduced mass errors and enhanced dynamic range were observed for both simple and complex omic samples. Specifically, the mass error dropped by more than 50% in most cases for highly saturated species and dynamic range increased by 1-2 orders of magnitude for peptides in a blood serum sample.
通过质谱(MS)测量检测到的离子的质量精度和峰强度对于促进化合物的鉴定和定量至关重要。然而,如果高浓度物质的离子强度超出检测系统的极限,可能会产生错误的结果,导致检测器响应失真和不理想(例如饱和),并在很大程度上妨碍准确质量和强度值的计算。在此,我们提出一种开源计算方法,用于校正高于由MS仪器(如与飞行时间质谱联用的模数转换器或时间数字转换器)确定的定义强度(饱和)阈值的峰。在这种方法中,将高于饱和阈值的每个观察到的离子的同位素包络与其预期的理论同位素分布进行比较。然后利用未发生饱和的最强同位素峰重新计算前体并校正强度,从而提高质量精度和扩大动态范围。使用不同复杂程度的蛋白质组学和脂质组学数据集评估了这种方法的益处。校正高浓度物质后,简单和复杂的组学样品均观察到质量误差降低和动态范围扩大。具体而言,对于高度饱和的物质,在大多数情况下质量误差下降超过50%,血清样品中肽的动态范围增加1-2个数量级。