Del Giglio Mauro, Mikus Elisa, Nerla Roberto, Micari Antonio, Calvi Simone, Tripodi Alberto, Campo Gianluca, Maietti Elisa, Castriota Fausto, Cremonesi Alberto
Cardiothoracic and Vascular Department, Maria Cecilia Hospital, GVM Care & Research, Cotignola, Italy.
Cardiac Surgery, Istituto clinico San Rocco Ome, Gruppo San Donato Milano, Milano, Italy.
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Mar;10(3):1588-1595. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.03.47.
Right anterior mini-thoracotomy (MIAVR) is a promising technique for aortic valve replacement. We aimed at comparing its outcomes with those obtained in a propensity-matched group of patients undergoing sternotomy at our two high-volume centers.
Main clinical and operative data of patients undergoing aortic valve replacement between January 2010 and May 2016 were retrospectively collected. A total of 678 patients were treated with a standard full sternotomy approach, while MIAVR was performed in 502. Propensity score matching identified 363 patients per each group.
In-hospital mortality was not significantly different between the propensity-matched groups (1.7% in MIAVR patients 2.2% in conventional sternotomy patients; P=0.79). No significant difference in the incidence of major post-operative complications was observed. Post-operative ventilation times (median 7, range 5-12 hours in MIAVR patients median 7, range 5-12 in conventional sternotomy patients; P=0.72) were not significantly different between the two groups. Cardiopulmonary bypass time (61.0±21.0 65.9±24.7 min in conventional sternotomy group; P<0.01) and aortic cross-clamping time (48.3±16.7 53.2±19.6 min in full sternotomy group; P<0.01) were shorter in MIAVR group. EuroSCORE (OR 1.52, 95% CI, 1.12-2.06; P<0.01) was found to be the only independent predictor of intra-hospital mortality in the whole propensity-matched population.
Our experience shows that mini-access isolated aortic valve surgery is a reproducible, safe and effective procedure with similar outcomes and no longer operative times compared to conventional sternotomy.
右前小切口开胸术(MIAVR)是一种有前景的主动脉瓣置换技术。我们旨在将其结果与在我们两个高容量中心接受胸骨切开术的倾向匹配患者组的结果进行比较。
回顾性收集2010年1月至2016年5月期间接受主动脉瓣置换术患者的主要临床和手术数据。共有678例患者采用标准全胸骨切开术治疗,而502例患者接受了MIAVR。倾向评分匹配每组确定363例患者。
倾向匹配组之间的住院死亡率无显著差异(MIAVR患者为1.7%,传统胸骨切开术患者为2.2%;P=0.79)。术后主要并发症的发生率未观察到显著差异。两组术后通气时间(MIAVR患者中位数为7小时,范围为5 - 12小时,传统胸骨切开术患者中位数为7小时,范围为5 - 12小时;P=0.72)无显著差异。MIAVR组的体外循环时间(传统胸骨切开术组为61.0±21.0对65.9±24.7分钟;P<0.01)和主动脉阻断时间(全胸骨切开术组为48.3±16.7对53.2±19.6分钟;P<0.01)较短。欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统(OR 1.52,95%CI,1.12 - 2.06;P<0.01)被发现是整个倾向匹配人群中院内死亡率的唯一独立预测因素。
我们的经验表明,与传统胸骨切开术相比,微创孤立主动脉瓣手术是一种可重复、安全有效的手术,结果相似且手术时间更短。