• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Right anterior mini-thoracotomy conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: a propensity-matched comparison.右前侧小切口开胸术与传统胸骨切开术用于主动脉瓣置换的倾向匹配比较。
J Thorac Dis. 2018 Mar;10(3):1588-1595. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.03.47.
2
Minimally invasive and conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity score analysis.微创与传统主动脉瓣置换术:倾向评分分析。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Sep;96(3):837-43. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.04.102. Epub 2013 Jul 16.
3
Early Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Right Anterior Thoracotomy vs. Median Full Sternotomy in Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement: A Propensity Score Analysis.微创右前胸切开术与正中全胸骨切开术在孤立性主动脉瓣置换术中的早期结果:倾向评分分析。
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Apr 3;39(3):e20230108. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2023-0108.
4
Minimally invasive and full sternotomy in aortic valve replacement: a comparative early operative outcomes.微创与全胸骨切开主动脉瓣置换术:早期手术结果比较。
Pan Afr Med J. 2021 Sep 30;40:68. doi: 10.11604/pamj.2021.40.68.28008. eCollection 2021.
5
Propensity matched analysis of minimally invasive versus conventional isolated aortic valve replacement.微创与传统孤立主动脉瓣置换术的倾向性匹配分析。
Perfusion. 2023 Mar;38(2):261-269. doi: 10.1177/02676591211045802. Epub 2021 Sep 13.
6
A comparison of aortic valve replacement via an anterior right minithoracotomy with standard sternotomy: a propensity score analysis of 492 patients.经右前小切口主动脉瓣置换术与标准胸骨切开术的比较:492例患者的倾向评分分析
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Feb;49(2):456-63. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv038. Epub 2015 Mar 6.
7
Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement Via Right Anterior Mini-Thoracotomy: Propensity Matched Initial Experience.经右前小切口微创主动脉瓣置换术:倾向匹配的初步经验
Heart Lung Circ. 2019 Feb;28(2):320-326. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2017.11.012. Epub 2017 Dec 7.
8
Improved Patient Recovery With Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Surgery: A Propensity-Matched Study.微创主动脉瓣手术改善患者恢复情况:一项倾向评分匹配研究。
Innovations (Phila). 2019 Oct;14(5):419-427. doi: 10.1177/1556984519868715. Epub 2019 Aug 21.
9
Use of Adjuncts Reduces Cardiopulmonary Bypass Time During Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement.辅助设备的使用可缩短微创主动脉瓣置换术中的体外循环时间。
J Heart Valve Dis. 2017 Mar;26(2):155-160.
10

引用本文的文献

1
Quality of Life After Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement Surgery: A Systematic Review.微创主动脉瓣置换术后的生活质量:一项系统评价
Innovations (Phila). 2025 May-Jun;20(3):252-256. doi: 10.1177/15569845251337405. Epub 2025 May 12.
2
Minimally invasive anterior thoracotomy approach for complex sinus venosus atrial septal defect with anomalous pulmonary venous return: A case report.微创前胸切开术治疗合并肺静脉异位引流的复杂静脉窦型房间隔缺损:病例报告
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2025 Apr;129:111199. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2025.111199. Epub 2025 Mar 25.
3
Midterm Outcomes of Right Anterior Mini Thoracotomy Aortic Valve Replacement.右前小切口主动脉瓣置换术的中期结果
CJC Open. 2024 Sep 13;6(12):1484-1490. doi: 10.1016/j.cjco.2024.09.004. eCollection 2024 Dec.
4
Gender-Tailored Heart Team Decision Making Equalizes Outcomes for Female Patients after Aortic Valve Replacement through Right Anterior Small Thoracotomy (RAST).性别定制的心脏团队决策通过右前小切口开胸术(RAST)使女性患者主动脉瓣置换术后的治疗结果均等化。
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024 Oct 16;11(10):329. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11100329.
5
Right Anterior Minithoracotomy Approach for Aortic Valve Replacement.右前小切口开胸入路行主动脉瓣置换术
Innovations (Phila). 2024 Sep-Oct;19(5):494-508. doi: 10.1177/15569845241276876. Epub 2024 Sep 21.
6
Minimally invasive approaches versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement in patients with aortic valve disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 17 269 patients.主动脉瓣疾病患者行主动脉瓣置换术时微创方法与传统胸骨切开术的比较:对17269例患者的系统评价和荟萃分析
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2024 Jun 4;86(7):4005-4014. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000002204. eCollection 2024 Jul.
7
First experiences with automated annular suturing device in totally endoscopic aortic and mitral valve replacement.完全内镜下主动脉瓣和二尖瓣置换术中自动环行缝合装置的首次应用经验。
Interdiscip Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2024 Jun 5;38(6). doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivae112.
8
Minimally Invasive and Full Sternotomy Aortic Valve Replacements Lead to Comparable Long-Term Outcomes in Elderly Higher-Risk Patients: A Propensity-Matched Comparison.微创与全胸骨切开主动脉瓣置换术在老年高危患者中导致相似的长期结局:一项倾向匹配比较。
J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2024 Mar 31;11(4):112. doi: 10.3390/jcdd11040112.
9
Early Outcomes of Minimally Invasive Right Anterior Thoracotomy vs. Median Full Sternotomy in Isolated Aortic Valve Replacement: A Propensity Score Analysis.微创右前胸切开术与正中全胸骨切开术在孤立性主动脉瓣置换术中的早期结果:倾向评分分析。
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Apr 3;39(3):e20230108. doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2023-0108.
10
Minimally invasive approach associated with lower resource utilization after aortic and mitral valve surgery.主动脉和二尖瓣手术后,微创方法与更低的资源利用率相关。
JTCVS Open. 2023 Jun 28;15:72-80. doi: 10.1016/j.xjon.2023.06.007. eCollection 2023 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
Minimal access versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis of propensity-matched studies.微创与传统主动脉瓣置换术:倾向评分匹配研究的荟萃分析。
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2017 Oct 1;25(4):624-632. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivx212.
2
Propensity score analysis of outcomes following minimal access versus conventional aortic valve replacement.微创与传统主动脉瓣置换术后结局的倾向评分分析
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Feb;49(2):464-9; discussion 469-70. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezv061. Epub 2015 Mar 1.
3
Aortic valve replacement through right minithoracotomy: is it really biologically minimally invasive?经右胸小切口行主动脉瓣置换术:它真的是生物微创吗?
Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Mar;99(3):826-30. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.09.046. Epub 2015 Jan 9.
4
A meta-analysis of minimally invasive versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement.主动脉瓣置换术微创与传统胸骨切开术的荟萃分析。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Oct;98(4):1499-511. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.05.060. Epub 2014 Jul 24.
5
Aortic valve replacement via right minithoracotomy versus median sternotomy: a propensity score analysis.经右胸小切口与正中胸骨切开术行主动脉瓣置换术:倾向评分分析
Innovations (Phila). 2014 Mar-Apr;9(2):75-81; discussion 81. doi: 10.1097/IMI.0000000000000062.
6
Minimally invasive and conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity score analysis.微创与传统主动脉瓣置换术:倾向评分分析。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Sep;96(3):837-43. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.04.102. Epub 2013 Jul 16.
7
Aortic cross-clamp time, new prostheses, and outcome in aortic valve replacement.主动脉瓣置换术中的主动脉交叉阻断时间、新型人工瓣膜与手术结果
J Heart Valve Dis. 2012 Nov;21(6):732-9.
8
Right anterior minithoracotomy versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a propensity score matched study.右前小开胸术与传统主动脉瓣置换术的比较:倾向评分匹配研究。
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 May;145(5):1222-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2012.03.064. Epub 2012 Apr 18.
9
Traversing the learning curve in minimally invasive heart valve surgery: a cumulative analysis of an individual surgeon's experience with a right minithoracotomy approach for aortic valve replacement.微创心脏瓣膜手术学习曲线的跨越:一位外科医生采用右迷你开胸入路行主动脉瓣置换术的经验累积分析。
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Jun;41(6):1242-6. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezr230. Epub 2012 Jan 9.
10
Right minithoracotomy versus full sternotomy for the aortic valve replacement: preliminary results.右胸前外侧小切口与胸骨正中切口行主动脉瓣置换术的比较:初步结果。
Heart Lung Circ. 2012 Mar;21(3):169-73. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2011.10.004. Epub 2011 Nov 8.

右前侧小切口开胸术与传统胸骨切开术用于主动脉瓣置换的倾向匹配比较。

Right anterior mini-thoracotomy conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: a propensity-matched comparison.

作者信息

Del Giglio Mauro, Mikus Elisa, Nerla Roberto, Micari Antonio, Calvi Simone, Tripodi Alberto, Campo Gianluca, Maietti Elisa, Castriota Fausto, Cremonesi Alberto

机构信息

Cardiothoracic and Vascular Department, Maria Cecilia Hospital, GVM Care & Research, Cotignola, Italy.

Cardiac Surgery, Istituto clinico San Rocco Ome, Gruppo San Donato Milano, Milano, Italy.

出版信息

J Thorac Dis. 2018 Mar;10(3):1588-1595. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2018.03.47.

DOI:10.21037/jtd.2018.03.47
PMID:29707310
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5906311/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Right anterior mini-thoracotomy (MIAVR) is a promising technique for aortic valve replacement. We aimed at comparing its outcomes with those obtained in a propensity-matched group of patients undergoing sternotomy at our two high-volume centers.

METHODS

Main clinical and operative data of patients undergoing aortic valve replacement between January 2010 and May 2016 were retrospectively collected. A total of 678 patients were treated with a standard full sternotomy approach, while MIAVR was performed in 502. Propensity score matching identified 363 patients per each group.

RESULTS

In-hospital mortality was not significantly different between the propensity-matched groups (1.7% in MIAVR patients 2.2% in conventional sternotomy patients; P=0.79). No significant difference in the incidence of major post-operative complications was observed. Post-operative ventilation times (median 7, range 5-12 hours in MIAVR patients median 7, range 5-12 in conventional sternotomy patients; P=0.72) were not significantly different between the two groups. Cardiopulmonary bypass time (61.0±21.0 65.9±24.7 min in conventional sternotomy group; P<0.01) and aortic cross-clamping time (48.3±16.7 53.2±19.6 min in full sternotomy group; P<0.01) were shorter in MIAVR group. EuroSCORE (OR 1.52, 95% CI, 1.12-2.06; P<0.01) was found to be the only independent predictor of intra-hospital mortality in the whole propensity-matched population.

CONCLUSIONS

Our experience shows that mini-access isolated aortic valve surgery is a reproducible, safe and effective procedure with similar outcomes and no longer operative times compared to conventional sternotomy.

摘要

背景

右前小切口开胸术(MIAVR)是一种有前景的主动脉瓣置换技术。我们旨在将其结果与在我们两个高容量中心接受胸骨切开术的倾向匹配患者组的结果进行比较。

方法

回顾性收集2010年1月至2016年5月期间接受主动脉瓣置换术患者的主要临床和手术数据。共有678例患者采用标准全胸骨切开术治疗,而502例患者接受了MIAVR。倾向评分匹配每组确定363例患者。

结果

倾向匹配组之间的住院死亡率无显著差异(MIAVR患者为1.7%,传统胸骨切开术患者为2.2%;P=0.79)。术后主要并发症的发生率未观察到显著差异。两组术后通气时间(MIAVR患者中位数为7小时,范围为5 - 12小时,传统胸骨切开术患者中位数为7小时,范围为5 - 12小时;P=0.72)无显著差异。MIAVR组的体外循环时间(传统胸骨切开术组为61.0±21.0对65.9±24.7分钟;P<0.01)和主动脉阻断时间(全胸骨切开术组为48.3±16.7对53.2±19.6分钟;P<0.01)较短。欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统(OR 1.52,95%CI,1.12 - 2.06;P<0.01)被发现是整个倾向匹配人群中院内死亡率的唯一独立预测因素。

结论

我们的经验表明,与传统胸骨切开术相比,微创孤立主动脉瓣手术是一种可重复、安全有效的手术,结果相似且手术时间更短。