Suppr超能文献

成年人日常社交互动中的年龄差异:一项生态瞬间评估研究。

Age differences in adults' daily social interactions: An ecological momentary assessment study.

机构信息

Center for Healthy Aging, Pennsylvania State University.

出版信息

Psychol Aging. 2018 Jun;33(4):607-618. doi: 10.1037/pag0000242. Epub 2018 Apr 30.

Abstract

Prevailing research has suggested that social relationships get better with age, but this evidence has been largely based on studies with lengthy reporting intervals. Using an ecological momentary assessment approach, the present study examined age differences in several characteristics of social interactions as reported in near-real time: the frequency, quality, and partner type. Participants (N = 173) ages 20-79 years reported their social interactions at 5 random times throughout the day for 1 week. Results revealed that age was associated with higher frequency of interacting with family and lower frequency of interacting with peripheral partners. These age effects, however, became nonsignificant after accounting for contextual factors such as race, gender, education, employment status, family structure, and living arrangement. In contrast, a curvilinear relationship best characterized age differences in both positive and negative ratings of daily social interaction quality, with middle-aged adults reporting the lowest positive ratings and older adults reporting the lowest negative ratings among all ages. Contextual factors did not account for these patterns of age differences in interaction quality. Furthermore, the intraindividual variability of interaction frequency with peripheral partners, partner diversity, and interaction quality (positivity and negativity) was lower among older adults than among younger adults. Findings from the present study portray a nuanced picture of social interactions in daily life and advance the understanding of social interactions across the life span. (PsycINFO Database Record

摘要

主流研究表明,社会关系会随着年龄的增长而改善,但这些证据主要基于具有较长报告间隔的研究。本研究采用生态瞬间评估方法,实时考察了社会互动的几个特征在不同年龄段的差异:互动频率、质量和伙伴类型。参与者(N=173)年龄在 20-79 岁之间,在一周内的 5 个随机时间报告他们的社会互动。结果表明,年龄与与家人互动的频率更高和与边缘伙伴互动的频率更低有关。然而,在考虑到种族、性别、教育、就业状况、家庭结构和居住安排等背景因素后,这些年龄效应变得不显著。相比之下,正、负日常社会互动质量评分的年龄差异最好用曲线关系来描述,中年成年人的正评分最低,而所有年龄段中老年人的负评分最低。背景因素并不能解释这些互动质量的年龄差异模式。此外,与年轻成年人相比,老年成年人与边缘伙伴的互动频率、伙伴多样性和互动质量(积极性和消极性)的个体内变异性较低。本研究的结果描绘了日常生活中社会互动的复杂图景,推进了对整个生命周期社会互动的理解。

相似文献

1
Age differences in adults' daily social interactions: An ecological momentary assessment study.
Psychol Aging. 2018 Jun;33(4):607-618. doi: 10.1037/pag0000242. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
2
Social interactions and physical symptoms in daily life: quality matters for older adults, quantity matters for younger adults.
Psychol Health. 2019 Jul;34(7):867-885. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2019.1579908. Epub 2019 Mar 1.
4
Daily social interactions, close relationships, and systemic inflammation in two samples: Healthy middle-aged and older adults.
Brain Behav Immun. 2016 Nov;58:152-164. doi: 10.1016/j.bbi.2016.06.004. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
6
Empathy and Coping: Older Adults' Interpersonal Tensions and Mood throughout the Day.
Gerontology. 2021;67(1):101-111. doi: 10.1159/000511418. Epub 2020 Dec 9.
7
Routineness of Social Interactions Is Associated With Higher Affective Well-Being in Older Adults.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2024 Jun 1;79(6). doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbae057.
8
Friendships in Old Age: Daily Encounters and Emotional Well-Being.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2021 Feb 17;76(3):551-562. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbaa007.
9
How was your day? Convergence of aggregated momentary and retrospective end-of-day affect ratings across the adult life span.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2020 Jul;119(1):185-203. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000248. Epub 2019 May 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Bluetooth-sensed social presence is associated with immediate vigor and delayed fatigue: A multi-method time series analysis.
iScience. 2025 May 22;28(6):112726. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2025.112726. eCollection 2025 Jun 20.
6
Establishing construct validity for dynamic measures of behavior using naturalistic study designs.
Behav Res Methods. 2024 Dec 4;57(1):2. doi: 10.3758/s13428-024-02519-9.
8
Momentary loneliness and intrusive thoughts among older adults: the interactive roles of mild cognitive impairment and marital status.
Aging Ment Health. 2024 Dec;28(12):1785-1792. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2024.2368643. Epub 2024 Jun 22.
9
Mobile fNIRS for exploring inter-brain synchrony across generations and time.
Front Neuroergon. 2024 Jan 3;4:1260738. doi: 10.3389/fnrgo.2023.1260738. eCollection 2023.
10
Affective Reactions to daily interpersonal stressors: Moderation by family involvement and gender.
J Soc Pers Relat. 2023 Mar;40(3):1044-1066. doi: 10.1177/02654075221125431. Epub 2022 Sep 5.

本文引用的文献

1
Daily Memory Lapses in Adults: Characterization and Influence on Affect.
J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2019 Jan 1;74(1):59-68. doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbx012.
2
How the social ecology and social situation shape individuals' affect valence and arousal.
Emotion. 2017 Apr;17(3):509-527. doi: 10.1037/emo0000244. Epub 2016 Nov 21.
3
How We Experience Being Alone: Age Differences in Affective and Biological Correlates of Momentary Solitude.
Gerontology. 2017;63(1):55-66. doi: 10.1159/000450608. Epub 2016 Oct 20.
4
5
Age differences in loneliness from late adolescence to oldest old age.
Dev Psychol. 2016 Jun;52(6):943-59. doi: 10.1037/dev0000117. Epub 2016 May 5.
10
The convoy model: explaining social relations from a multidisciplinary perspective.
Gerontologist. 2014 Feb;54(1):82-92. doi: 10.1093/geront/gnt118. Epub 2013 Oct 19.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验