• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伊拉地平(PN 200 - 110)与氢氯噻嗪治疗轻至中度高血压的多中心研究。

Isradipine (PN 200-110) versus hydrochlorothiazide in mild to moderate hypertension. A multicenter study.

作者信息

Mohanty P K, Gonasun L M, Goodman R P, Kirkendal W M, Kontos H A, Samuel P, Wright J T

机构信息

Medical College of Virginia, Richmond.

出版信息

Am J Hypertens. 1988 Jul;1(3 Pt 3):241S-244S. doi: 10.1093/ajh/1.3.241s.

DOI:10.1093/ajh/1.3.241s
PMID:2970853
Abstract

The effects of 10 weeks of treatment with isradipine (ISRP), a new dihydropyridine Ca antagonist, was evaluated in a prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel group, hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) controlled study in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. Of 98 patients enrolled, 73 completed the study and were deemed valid for efficacy analyses; 36 in the ISRP group and 37 in the HCTZ group. Monotherapy with ISRP significantly (P less than 0.001) decreased (mean +/- SD) sitting systolic blood pressure (BP) from 146 +/- 11 mm Hg to 128 +/- 11 mm Hg and diastolic BP from 100 +/- 4 mm Hg to 83 +/- 5 mm Hg. Heart rate during the plateau period was not significantly different (76 +/- 11 vs 78 +/- 11 bpm) between the ISRP and HCTZ groups. These reductions in BP were comparable to monotherapy with HCTZ. The mean reduction in diastolic BP with ISRP (17 +/- 6 mm Hg) was significantly (P less than 0.05) greater than that with HCTZ (14 +/- 5 mm Hg). The mean doses for ISRP and HCTZ were 12 mg/day and 60 mg/day, respectively. There was no significant difference in frequency of common side effects (headache, nausea, fatigue, dizziness, palpitations) between the two groups. However, transient or intermittent peripheral edema occurred more frequently in ISRP group. Four patients in ISRP group (two due to edema and two due to palpitations) and two patients in HCTZ group (due to poor BP control) were discontinued from the study. Our results indicate that ISRP in doses of 5 to 10 mg bid is as effective as HCTZ as monotherapy in the treatment of mild to moderate hypertension.

摘要

在一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、平行组、以氢氯噻嗪(HCTZ)为对照的研究中,评估了新型二氢吡啶类钙拮抗剂伊拉地平(ISRP)治疗10周对轻至中度高血压患者的疗效。98名入组患者中,73名完成了研究并被认为可进行疗效分析;ISRP组36名,HCTZ组37名。ISRP单药治疗使坐位收缩压(BP)(均值±标准差)从146±11 mmHg显著降低(P<0.001)至128±11 mmHg,舒张压从100±4 mmHg降至83±5 mmHg。ISRP组和HCTZ组在平台期的心率无显著差异(76±11对78±11次/分钟)。这些血压降低幅度与HCTZ单药治疗相当。ISRP使舒张压的平均降低幅度(17±6 mmHg)显著大于HCTZ(14±5 mmHg)(P<0.05)。ISRP和HCTZ的平均剂量分别为12 mg/天和60 mg/天。两组常见副作用(头痛、恶心、疲劳、头晕、心悸)的发生率无显著差异。然而,ISRP组短暂或间歇性外周水肿出现得更频繁。ISRP组有4名患者(2名因水肿,2名因心悸)和HCTZ组有2名患者(因血压控制不佳)退出研究。我们的结果表明,每日两次服用5至10 mg的ISRP作为单药治疗轻至中度高血压与HCTZ同样有效。

相似文献

1
Isradipine (PN 200-110) versus hydrochlorothiazide in mild to moderate hypertension. A multicenter study.伊拉地平(PN 200 - 110)与氢氯噻嗪治疗轻至中度高血压的多中心研究。
Am J Hypertens. 1988 Jul;1(3 Pt 3):241S-244S. doi: 10.1093/ajh/1.3.241s.
2
Treatment of essential hypertension with PN 200-110 (isradipine).使用 PN 200 - 110(伊拉地平)治疗原发性高血压。
Am J Cardiol. 1987 Jan 30;59(3):141B-145B. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(87)90094-4.
3
Evaluation of isradipine (PN 200-110) in mild to moderate hypertension.
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1987 Oct;42(4):442-8. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1987.175.
4
Comparison of valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide combination therapy at doses up to 320/25 mg versus monotherapy: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study followed by long-term combination therapy in hypertensive adults.缬沙坦/氢氯噻嗪剂量高达320/25毫克的联合治疗与单药治疗的比较:一项针对高血压成人的双盲、安慰剂对照研究,随后进行长期联合治疗。
Clin Ther. 2007 Jan;29(1):61-73. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.01.007.
5
Efficacy and tolerability of combination therapy with valsartan plus hydrochlorothiazide compared with amlodipine monotherapy in hypertensive patients with other cardiovascular risk factors: the VAST study.缬沙坦联合氢氯噻嗪与氨氯地平单药治疗对伴有其他心血管危险因素的高血压患者的疗效及耐受性比较:VAST研究
Clin Ther. 2005 May;27(5):578-87. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.05.006.
6
Comparison of nitrendipine combined with low-dose hydrochlorothiazide to hydrochlorothiazide alone in mild to moderate essential hypertension.尼群地平联合小剂量氢氯噻嗪与单用氢氯噻嗪治疗轻至中度原发性高血压的比较。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1984;6 Suppl 7:S1105-8.
7
Efficacy and tolerability of candesartan cilexetil/hydrochlorothiazide and amlodipine in patients with poorly controlled mild-to-moderate essential hypertension.坎地沙坦酯/氢氯噻嗪与氨氯地平对轻度至中度原发性高血压控制不佳患者的疗效及耐受性
J Renin Angiotensin Aldosterone Syst. 2007 Sep;8(3):139-44. doi: 10.3317/jraas.2007.023.
8
Isradipine vs propranolol in hydrochlorothiazide-treated hypertensives. A multicenter evaluation.伊拉地平与普萘洛尔治疗氢氯噻嗪控制的高血压患者的多中心评估
Arch Intern Med. 1989 Nov;149(11):2453-7.
9
Hydrochlorothiazide is superior to isradipine for reduction of left ventricular mass: results of a multicenter trial. The Isradipine Study Group.氢氯噻嗪在减轻左心室质量方面优于伊拉地平:一项多中心试验的结果。伊拉地平研究组。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997 Dec;30(7):1802-8. doi: 10.1016/s0735-1097(97)00311-2.
10
Comparison of fixed-dose combinations of telmisartan/hydrochlorothiazide 40/12.5 mg and 80/12.5 mg and a fixed-dose combination of losartan/hydrochlorothiazide 50/12.5 mg in mild to moderate essential hypertension: pooled analysis of two multicenter, prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded-end point (PROBE) trials.替米沙坦/氢氯噻嗪40/12.5毫克和80/12.5毫克固定剂量组合与氯沙坦/氢氯噻嗪50/12.5毫克固定剂量组合治疗轻度至中度原发性高血压的比较:两项多中心、前瞻性、随机、开放标签、盲终点(PROBE)试验的汇总分析
Clin Ther. 2005 Nov;27(11):1795-805. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.11.014.

引用本文的文献

1
Isradipine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic use in cardiovascular disease.伊拉地平。对其药效学和药代动力学特性以及在心血管疾病治疗中的应用的综述。
Drugs. 1990 Jul;40(1):31-74. doi: 10.2165/00003495-199040010-00004.