• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

尼群地平联合小剂量氢氯噻嗪与单用氢氯噻嗪治疗轻至中度原发性高血压的比较。

Comparison of nitrendipine combined with low-dose hydrochlorothiazide to hydrochlorothiazide alone in mild to moderate essential hypertension.

作者信息

Schoenberger J A, Glasser S P, Ram C V, McMahon S G, Vanov S K, Leibowitz D A

出版信息

J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1984;6 Suppl 7:S1105-8.

PMID:6085376
Abstract

Patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension were treated in four centers with hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) 25 mg daily for 4 weeks. Those patients failing to achieve control (supine diastolic blood pressure (DBP) 90 mm Hg or lower) were randomly assigned to nitrendipine (NTP) 5 mg or placebo (PLA) b.i.d. NTP or PLA was increased stepwise to 20 mg b.i.d. as needed to achieve control. Treatment with HCTZ was maintained at 25 mg daily. Eighty-six patients completed the study: 41 in NTP + HCTZ and 45 in PLA + HCTZ groups. Both groups were comparable in baseline characteristics. Supine systolic blood pressure (SBP) was 148.6 +/- 14.4 and DBP was 96.0 +/- 5.4 mm Hg in the NTP + HCTZ group. SBP was 147.4 +/- 16.6 and DBP was 96.4 +/- 5.6 mm Hg in the PLA + HCTZ group. At the end of 7 weeks of titration and treatment with NTP or PLA combined with HCTZ, SBP had fallen to 133.4 +/- 15.1 and DBP to 85.4 +/- 5.9 mm Hg in the NTP + HCTZ group. SBP fell to 138.8 +/- 16.2 and DBP to 90.7 +/- 6.3 mm Hg in the PLA + HCTZ group. The increment in lowering of both SBP and DBP was significantly greater (p = 0.002 and p = 0.0007, respectively) in the NTP + HCTZ group compared to the PLA + HCTZ group.

摘要

轻度至中度原发性高血压患者在四个中心接受治疗,每日服用25毫克氢氯噻嗪(HCTZ),持续4周。那些未能实现血压控制(仰卧位舒张压(DBP)90毫米汞柱或更低)的患者被随机分配至每日两次服用5毫克尼群地平(NTP)或安慰剂(PLA)。根据需要,NTP或PLA逐步增加至每日两次20毫克以实现血压控制。HCTZ的治疗维持在每日25毫克。八十六名患者完成了研究:NTP + HCTZ组41例,PLA + HCTZ组45例。两组在基线特征方面具有可比性。NTP + HCTZ组仰卧位收缩压(SBP)为148.6±14.4,DBP为96.0±5.4毫米汞柱。PLA + HCTZ组SBP为147.4±16.6,DBP为96.4±5.6毫米汞柱。在与HCTZ联合使用NTP或PLA进行滴定和治疗7周结束时,NTP + HCTZ组SBP降至133.4±15.1,DBP降至85.4±5.9毫米汞柱。PLA + HCTZ组SBP降至138.8±16.2,DBP降至90.7±6.3毫米汞柱。与PLA + HCTZ组相比,NTP + HCTZ组SBP和DBP降低幅度的增加显著更大(分别为p = 0.002和p = 0.0007)。

相似文献

1
Comparison of nitrendipine combined with low-dose hydrochlorothiazide to hydrochlorothiazide alone in mild to moderate essential hypertension.尼群地平联合小剂量氢氯噻嗪与单用氢氯噻嗪治疗轻至中度原发性高血压的比较。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1984;6 Suppl 7:S1105-8.
2
Efficacy and tolerability of combination therapy with valsartan plus hydrochlorothiazide compared with amlodipine monotherapy in hypertensive patients with other cardiovascular risk factors: the VAST study.缬沙坦联合氢氯噻嗪与氨氯地平单药治疗对伴有其他心血管危险因素的高血压患者的疗效及耐受性比较:VAST研究
Clin Ther. 2005 May;27(5):578-87. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.05.006.
3
Efficacy and safety of delapril plus manidipine compared with enalapril plus hydrochlorothiazide in mild to moderate essential hypertension: results of a randomized trial.在轻度至中度原发性高血压患者中,比较地拉普利联合马尼地平与依那普利联合氢氯噻嗪的疗效和安全性:一项随机试验的结果
Clin Ther. 2004 Sep;26(9):1419-26. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2004.09.018.
4
Antihypertensive efficacy and tolerability of two fixed-dose combinations of valsartan and hydrochlorothiazide compared with valsartan monotherapy in patients with stage 2 or 3 systolic hypertension: an 8-week, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group trial.缬沙坦与氢氯噻嗪两种固定剂量复方制剂与缬沙坦单药治疗对2或3期收缩期高血压患者的降压疗效及耐受性比较:一项为期8周的随机、双盲、平行组试验
Clin Ther. 2005 Jul;27(7):1013-21. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2005.07.010.
5
Tolerability and blood pressure-lowering efficacy of the combination of amlodipine plus valsartan compared with lisinopril plus hydrochlorothiazide in adult patients with stage 2 hypertension.氨氯地平联合缬沙坦与赖诺普利联合氢氯噻嗪治疗成年2级高血压患者的耐受性及降压疗效比较
Clin Ther. 2007 Feb;29(2):279-89. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.02.003.
6
The results of a large multicentre study comparing low-dose lisinopril-hydrochlorothiazide with the monocomponents.一项比较低剂量赖诺普利-氢氯噻嗪与单一成分药物的大型多中心研究结果。
J Hum Hypertens. 1991 Dec;5 Suppl 2:73-6.
7
Efficacy and safety of nitrendipine in patients with severe hypertension: a multiclinic study.尼群地平治疗重度高血压患者的疗效与安全性:一项多中心研究。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1984;6 Suppl 7:S1053-9.
8
The calcium channel blocker nitrendipine in single- and multiple-agent antihypertensive regimens: preliminary report of a multicenter study.钙通道阻滞剂尼群地平在单药及联合用药抗高血压治疗方案中的应用:一项多中心研究的初步报告
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1984;6 Suppl 7:S1077-84.
9
Comparison of valsartan/hydrochlorothiazide combination therapy at doses up to 320/25 mg versus monotherapy: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study followed by long-term combination therapy in hypertensive adults.缬沙坦/氢氯噻嗪剂量高达320/25毫克的联合治疗与单药治疗的比较:一项针对高血压成人的双盲、安慰剂对照研究,随后进行长期联合治疗。
Clin Ther. 2007 Jan;29(1):61-73. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.01.007.
10
A randomized, controlled trial comparing diltiazem, hydrochlorothiazide, and their combination in the therapy of essential hypertension.一项比较地尔硫䓬、氢氯噻嗪及其联合用药治疗原发性高血压的随机对照试验。
Pharmacotherapy. 1993 Sep-Oct;13(5):487-93.

引用本文的文献

1
Nitrendipine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic efficacy in the treatment of hypertension.尼群地平。对其药效学和药代动力学特性以及治疗高血压的疗效的综述。
Drugs. 1987 Feb;33(2):123-55. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198733020-00003.
2
'Second generation' dihydropyridine calcium antagonists. Greater vascular selectivity and some unique applications.“第二代”二氢吡啶类钙拮抗剂。更高的血管选择性及一些独特的应用。
Drugs. 1987 Nov;34(5):578-98. doi: 10.2165/00003495-198734050-00005.
3
Calcium channel antagonists. Part V: Second-generation agents.
钙通道拮抗剂。第五部分:第二代药物。
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1988 Jul;2(2):191-203. doi: 10.1007/BF00051234.
4
Racial differences in antihypertensive therapy: evidence and implications.抗高血压治疗中的种族差异:证据与启示
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1990 Mar;4 Suppl 2:379-82. doi: 10.1007/BF02603180.