University of Florida College of Pharmacy, Pharmaceutical Outcomes & Policy, Gainesville, FL, United States of America.
Stanford University Medical Center, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Palo Alto, CA, United States of America.
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 30;13(4):e0196452. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196452. eCollection 2018.
Economic burden of HBV and HCV infection are trending upwards.
Compare hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) related hospital admission rates, charges, mortality rates, causes of death in a US population-based study.
Retrospective cohort analysis of HBV and HCV patients from the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development (2006-2013) database.
A total of 23,891 HBV and 148,229 HCV patients were identified. Across the 8-year period, the mean increase for all-cause ($1,863 vs $1,388) and liver-related hospitalization charges ($1,175 vs $675) were significantly higher for the HBV cohort compared to the HCV cohort. HBV patients had significantly higher liver-related hospital charges per person per year than HCV patients after controlling for covariates ($123,239 vs $111,837; p = 0.002). Compared to HCV patients, adjusted mortality hazard ratio was slightly lower in HBV patients (relative risk = 0.96; 95% CI 0.94-0.99). The major causes and places of death were different. The three major causes of death for HBV were: other malignant neoplasms (35%), cardiovascular disease/other circulatory disorders (17%), and liver-related disease (15%) whereas for HCV patients were: liver-related disease (22%), other malignant neoplasms (20%), and cardiovascular disease (16%). Regarding the place of death, 53% of HBV patients and 44% of HCV patients died in hospital inpatient, respectively.
HBV patients incurred higher liver-related hospital charges and higher mean increase for all-cause and liver-related hospitalization charges over the 8-year period compared to HCV patients. HBV patients had slightly lower mortality rate and their major causes and places of death were noticeably different from HCV patients.
乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)和丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染的经济负担呈上升趋势。
在一项美国基于人群的研究中,比较乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)和丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)相关的住院率、费用、死亡率和死亡原因。
对加利福尼亚州全州卫生规划和发展办公室(2006-2013 年)数据库中的 HBV 和 HCV 患者进行回顾性队列分析。
共确定了 23891 例 HBV 和 148229 例 HCV 患者。在 8 年期间,与 HCV 队列相比,所有原因(1863 美元对 1388 美元)和肝脏相关住院费用(1175 美元对 675 美元)的平均增长均显著更高。在控制了协变量后,HBV 患者的肝脏相关人均年住院费用显著高于 HCV 患者(123239 美元对 111837 美元;p = 0.002)。与 HCV 患者相比,HBV 患者调整后的死亡率危险比略低(相对风险 = 0.96;95%CI 0.94-0.99)。主要死因和死亡地点不同。HBV 患者的三大死因分别为:其他恶性肿瘤(35%)、心血管疾病/其他循环系统疾病(17%)和肝脏相关疾病(15%),而 HCV 患者的三大死因分别为:肝脏相关疾病(22%)、其他恶性肿瘤(20%)和心血管疾病(16%)。至于死亡地点,53%的 HBV 患者和 44%的 HCV 患者分别死于医院住院。
与 HCV 患者相比,HBV 患者在 8 年期间的肝脏相关住院费用更高,全因和肝脏相关住院费用的平均增幅也更高。HBV 患者的死亡率略低,其主要死因和死亡地点与 HCV 患者明显不同。