• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

柳叶刀倒计时:英国气候变化法案带来的健康效益——大不列颠建模研究

The Lancet Countdown on health benefits from the UK Climate Change Act: a modelling study for Great Britain.

机构信息

Environmental Research Group and Medical Research Council-Public Health England (MRC-PHE), King's College London, London, UK.

Institute for Sustainable Resources, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Lancet Planet Health. 2018 May;2(5):e202-e213. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(18)30067-6.

DOI:10.1016/S2542-5196(18)30067-6
PMID:29709284
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Climate change poses a dangerous and immediate threat to the health of populations in the UK and worldwide. We aimed to model different scenarios to assess the health co-benefits that result from mitigation actions.

METHODS

In this modelling study, we combined a detailed techno-economic energy systems model (UK TIMES), air pollutant emission inventories, a sophisticated air pollution model (Community Multi-scale Air Quality), and previously published associations between concentrations and health outcomes. We used four scenarios and focused on the air pollution implications from fine particulate matter (PM), nitrogen dioxide (NO) and ozone. The four scenarios were baseline, which assumed no further climate actions beyond those already achieved and did not meet the UK's Climate Change Act (at least an 80% reduction in carbon dioxide equivalent emissions by 2050 compared with 1990) target; nuclear power, which met the Climate Change Act target with a limited increase in nuclear power; low-greenhouse gas, which met the Climate Change Act target without any policy constraint on nuclear build; and a constant scenario that held 2011 air pollutant concentrations constant until 2050. We predicted the health and economic impacts from air pollution for the scenarios until 2050, and the inequalities in exposure across different socioeconomic groups.

FINDINGS

NO concentrations declined leading to 4 892 000 life-years saved for the nuclear power scenario and 7 178 000 life-years saved for the low-greenhouse gas scenario from 2011 to 2154. However, the associations that we used might overestimate the effects of NO itself. PM concentrations in Great Britain are predicted to decrease between 42% and 44% by 2050 compared with 2011 in the scenarios that met the Climate Change Act targets, especially those from road traffic and off-road machinery. These reductions in PM are tempered by a 2035 peak (and subsequent decline) in biomass (wood burning), and by a large, projected increase in future demand for transport leading to potential increases in non-exhaust particulate matter emissions. The potential use of biomass in poorly controlled technologies to meet the Climate Change Act commitments would represent an important missed opportunity (resulting in 472 000 more life-years lost from PM in the low-greenhouse gas scenario and 1 122 000 more life-years lost in the nuclear power scenario from PM than the baseline scenario). Although substantial overall improvements in absolute amounts of exposure are seen compared with 2011, these outcomes mask the fact that health inequalities seen (in which socioeconomically disadvantaged populations are among the most exposed) are projected to be maintained up to 2050.

INTERPRETATION

The modelling infrastructure created will help future researchers explore a wider range of climate policy scenarios, including local, European, and global scenarios. The need to strengthen the links between climate change policy objectives and public health imperatives, and the benefits to societal wellbeing that might result is urgent.

FUNDING

National Institute for Health Research.

摘要

背景

气候变化对英国乃至全球人口的健康构成了危险且迫在眉睫的威胁。我们旨在通过模拟不同的情景来评估缓解行动带来的健康协同效益。

方法

在这项建模研究中,我们结合了详细的技术经济能源系统模型(英国 TIMES)、空气污染物排放清单、复杂的空气污染模型(社区多尺度空气质量模型)以及之前发表的浓度与健康结果之间的关联。我们使用了四个情景,并重点研究了细颗粒物(PM)、二氧化氮(NO)和臭氧带来的空气污染影响。四个情景分别为基线情景,假设除已经实现的气候行动之外不再采取任何进一步的行动,并且不满足英国气候变化法案(到 2050 年,与 1990 年相比,二氧化碳当量排放减少至少 80%)的目标;核电情景,通过有限增加核电来满足气候变化法案的目标;低碳温室气体情景,在不限制核电建设的情况下满足气候变化法案的目标;以及恒定情景,该情景将 2011 年的空气污染物浓度保持到 2050 年。我们预测了到 2050 年各个情景的空气污染对健康和经济的影响,以及不同社会经济群体之间的暴露不平等情况。

结果

NO 浓度下降,核电情景下 2011 年至 2154 年预计将挽救 489.2 万生命年,低碳温室气体情景下预计将挽救 717.8 万生命年。然而,我们使用的关联可能会高估 NO 本身的影响。在满足气候变化法案目标的情景下,英国的 PM 浓度预计到 2050 年将比 2011 年下降 42%至 44%,尤其是道路交通和非道路机械产生的 PM 浓度。这一降幅受到 2035 年(随后下降)生物质(木柴燃烧)峰值的影响,以及未来对交通需求的大幅预测增长,这可能导致非排放性颗粒物排放增加。在满足气候变化法案承诺方面,生物质可能在控制不良的技术中被广泛应用,这将是一个重要的错失的机会(在低碳温室气体情景下,与基线情景相比,PM 造成的生命损失将增加 47.2 万,在核电情景下,PM 造成的生命损失将增加 112.2 万)。尽管与 2011 年相比,暴露量的绝对数量有了显著改善,但这些结果掩盖了一个事实,即健康不平等(社会经济劣势人群暴露程度最高)预计将持续到 2050 年。

解释

创建的建模基础设施将帮助未来的研究人员探索更广泛的气候政策情景,包括地方、欧洲和全球情景。加强气候变化政策目标与公共卫生重点之间的联系,并利用这些措施为社会福利带来的好处,这是当务之急。

资助

英国国家卫生研究院。

相似文献

1
The Lancet Countdown on health benefits from the UK Climate Change Act: a modelling study for Great Britain.柳叶刀倒计时:英国气候变化法案带来的健康效益——大不列颠建模研究
Lancet Planet Health. 2018 May;2(5):e202-e213. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(18)30067-6.
2
3
Health co-benefits from air pollution and mitigation costs of the Paris Agreement: a modelling study.空气污染的健康协同效益和《巴黎协定》的缓解成本:一项建模研究。
Lancet Planet Health. 2018 Mar;2(3):e126-e133. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(18)30029-9. Epub 2018 Mar 2.
4
The 2023 Latin America report of the Countdown on health and climate change: the imperative for health-centred climate-resilient development.《2023年健康与气候变化倒计时拉丁美洲报告:以健康为中心的气候适应型发展的必要性》
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Apr 23;33:100746. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100746. eCollection 2024 May.
5
Climate change policies reduce air pollution and increase physical activity: Benefits, costs, inequalities, and indoor exposures.气候变化政策可减少空气污染并增加身体活动:益处、成本、不平等现象及室内暴露情况。
Environ Int. 2025 Jan;195:109164. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2024.109164. Epub 2024 Nov 23.
6
Role of climate goals and clean-air policies on reducing future air pollution deaths in China: a modelling study.气候目标和清洁空气政策在减少中国未来空气污染死亡人数中的作用:一项建模研究。
Lancet Planet Health. 2022 Feb;6(2):e92-e99. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(21)00326-0.
7
Improvements in Air Quality and Health Outcomes Among California Medicaid Enrollees Due to Goods Movement Actions.由于货物运输行动,加利福尼亚医疗补助计划参保者的空气质量和健康结果得到改善。
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2021 May;2021(205):1-61.
8
The Lancet Countdown on PM pollution-related health impacts of China's projected carbon dioxide mitigation in the electric power generation sector under the Paris Agreement: a modelling study.《柳叶刀倒计时》研究报告:基于《巴黎协定》,中国在发电部门减少二氧化碳排放的情景下,预测对 PM 污染相关健康影响的评估:建模研究
Lancet Planet Health. 2018 Apr;2(4):e151-e161. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(18)30050-0. Epub 2018 Apr 4.
9
The impact of the congestion charging scheme on air quality in London. Part 1. Emissions modeling and analysis of air pollution measurements.拥堵收费计划对伦敦空气质量的影响。第1部分。排放建模与空气污染测量分析。
Res Rep Health Eff Inst. 2011 Apr(155):5-71.
10
Development of the Low Emissions Analysis Platform - Integrated Benefits Calculator (LEAP-IBC) tool to assess air quality and climate co-benefits: Application for Bangladesh.开发低排放分析平台 - 综合效益计算器 (LEAP-IBC) 工具以评估空气质量和气候协同效益:孟加拉国的应用。
Environ Int. 2020 Dec;145:106155. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2020.106155. Epub 2020 Oct 4.

引用本文的文献

1
What Impact Does Net Zero Action on Road Transport and Building Heating Have on Exposure to UK Air Pollution?道路运输和建筑供暖的净零行动对英国空气污染暴露有何影响?
Environ Sci Technol. 2025 Jan 21;59(2):1274-1286. doi: 10.1021/acs.est.4c05601. Epub 2025 Jan 10.
2
Emission reduction strategies and health: a systematic review on the tools and methods to assess co-benefits.减排策略与健康:关于评估协同效益的工具和方法的系统综述
BMJ Open. 2024 Dec 9;14(12):e083214. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-083214.
3
Projecting non-communicable diseases attributable to air pollution in the climate change era: a systematic review.
在气候变化时代预测与空气污染相关的非传染性疾病:一项系统综述。
BMJ Open. 2024 May 7;14(5):e079826. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-079826.
4
HIPTox-Hazard Identification Platform to Assess the Health Impacts from Indoor and Outdoor Air Pollutant Exposures, through Mechanistic Toxicology: A Single-Centre Double-Blind Human Exposure Trial Protocol.用于通过机制毒理学评估室内和室外空气污染物暴露对健康影响的 HIPTox-危害识别平台:一项单中心双盲人体暴露试验方案。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Feb 29;21(3):0. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21030284.
5
Impact on mortality of pathways to net zero greenhouse gas emissions in England and Wales: a multisectoral modelling study.英格兰和威尔士温室气体净零排放途径对死亡率的影响:多部门建模研究。
Lancet Planet Health. 2023 Feb;7(2):e128-e136. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(22)00310-2. Epub 2023 Jan 24.
6
A Modelling Study on PM-Related Health Impacts from Climate Change and Air Pollution Emission Control - China, 2010s and 2040s.气候变化与空气污染排放控制对颗粒物相关健康影响的建模研究——中国,2010年代和2040年代
China CDC Wkly. 2021 Jun 4;3(23):500-506. doi: 10.46234/ccdcw2021.128.
7
Tools and Methods to Include Health in Climate Change Adaptation and Mitigation Strategies and Policies: A Scoping Review.纳入健康因素的工具和方法以应用于气候变化适应和缓解策略及政策:范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Mar 4;18(5):2547. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052547.
8
Health care's response to climate change: a carbon footprint assessment of the NHS in England.医疗保健应对气候变化:英格兰国民保健制度的碳足迹评估。
Lancet Planet Health. 2021 Feb;5(2):e84-e92. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30271-0.
9
Climate Change Mitigation Policies and Co-Impacts on Indigenous Health: A Scoping Review.气候变化缓解政策及其对原住民健康的共同影响:范围综述。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 Dec 4;17(23):9063. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17239063.
10
The impact of measurement error in modeled ambient particles exposures on health effect estimates in multilevel analysis: A simulation study.多水平分析中模拟环境颗粒物暴露的测量误差对健康效应估计的影响:一项模拟研究。
Environ Epidemiol. 2020 May 27;4(3):e094. doi: 10.1097/EE9.0000000000000094. eCollection 2020 Jun.