Is the behavior of disc replacement adjacent to fusion affected by the location of the fused level in hybrid surgery?

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Hybrid surgery (HS), consisting of cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) at the mobile level, along with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion at the spondylotic level, could be a promising treatment for patients with multilevel cervical degenerative disc disease (DDD). An advantage of this technique is that it uses an optimal procedure according to the status of each level. However, information is lacking regarding the influence of the relative location of the replacement and the fusion segment in vivo.

PURPOSE

We conducted the present study to investigate whether the location of the fusion affected the behavior of the disc replacement and adjacent segments in HS in vivo.

STUDY DESIGN

This is an observational study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

The numbers of patients in the arthroplasty-fusion (AF) and fusion-arthroplasty (FA) groups were 51 and 24, respectively.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA), Neck Disability Index (NDI), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores were evaluated. Global and segmental lordosis, the range of motion (ROM) of C2-C7, and the operated and adjacent segments were measured. Fusion rate and radiological changes at adjacent levels were observed.

METHODS

Between January 2010 and July 2016, 75 patients with cervical DDD at two contiguous levels undergoing a two-level HS were retrospectively reviewed. The patients were divided into AF and FA groups according to the locations of the disc replacement. Clinical outcomes were evaluated according to the JOA, NDI, and VAS scores. Radiological parameters, including global and segmental lordosis, the ROM of C2-C7, the operated and adjacent segments, and complications, were also evaluated.

RESULTS

Although the JOA, NDI, and VAS scores were improved in both the AF and the FA groups, no significant differences were found between the two groups at any follow-up point. Both groups maintained cervical lordosis, but no difference was found between the groups. Segmental lordosis at the fusion segment was significantly improved postoperatively (p<.001), whereas it was maintained at the arthroplasty segment. The ROM of C2-C7 was significantly decreased in both groups postoperatively (AF p=.001, FA p=.014), but no difference was found between the groups. The FA group exhibited a non-significant improvement in ROM at the arthroplasty segment. The ROM adjacent to the arthroplasty segment was increased, although not significantly, whereas the ROM adjacent to the fusion segment was significantly improved after surgery in both groups (p<.001). Fusion was achieved in all patients. No significant difference in complications was found between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In HS, cephalic or caudal fusion segments to the arthroplasty segment did not affect the clinical outcomes and the behavior of CDA. However, the ROM of adjacent segments was affected by the location of the fusion segment; segments adjacent to fusion segments had greater ROMs than segments adjacent to arthroplasty segments.