• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Development of a tool predicting severity of allergic reaction during peanut challenge.开发一种预测花生挑战期间过敏反应严重程度的工具。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2018 Jul;121(1):69-76.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2018.04.020. Epub 2018 Apr 27.
2
Distinct parameters of the basophil activation test reflect the severity and threshold of allergic reactions to peanut.嗜碱性粒细胞活化试验的不同参数反映了对花生过敏反应的严重程度和阈值。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015 Jan;135(1):179-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.09.001.
3
Biomarkers of severity and threshold of allergic reactions during oral peanut challenges.口服花生挑战期间严重程度和过敏反应阈值的生物标志物。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020 Aug;146(2):344-355. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2020.03.035. Epub 2020 Apr 18.
4
Modified oral food challenge used with sensitization biomarkers provides more real-life clinical thresholds for peanut allergy.改良的口服食物激发试验结合致敏生物标志物,为花生过敏提供了更符合实际临床情况的阈值。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2014 Aug;134(2):390-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.03.035. Epub 2014 May 13.
5
Predicting reactivity threshold in children with anaphylaxis to peanut.预测儿童花生过敏反应性阈值。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2018 Apr;48(4):415-423. doi: 10.1111/cea.13078. Epub 2018 Jan 25.
6
Individually dosed omalizumab: an effective treatment for severe peanut allergy.个体化剂量的奥马珠单抗:一种治疗严重花生过敏的有效方法。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2017 Apr;47(4):540-550. doi: 10.1111/cea.12862. Epub 2017 Jan 10.
7
Evidence of pathway-specific basophil anergy induced by peanut oral immunotherapy in peanut-allergic children.花生口服免疫治疗诱导花生过敏儿童特定途径的嗜碱性粒细胞无反应性的证据。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2012 Aug;42(8):1197-205. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2012.04028.x.
8
Does severity of low-dose, double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges reflect severity of allergic reactions to peanut in the community?低剂量、双盲、安慰剂对照食物激发试验的严重程度是否反映了社区中对花生过敏反应的严重程度?
Clin Exp Allergy. 2005 Sep;35(9):1227-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2005.02312.x.
9
Combining avidin with CD63 improves basophil activation test accuracy in classifying peanut allergy.结合亲和素与 CD63 可提高嗜碱性粒细胞激活试验对花生过敏分类的准确性。
Allergy. 2024 Feb;79(2):445-455. doi: 10.1111/all.15930. Epub 2023 Nov 2.
10
Basophil activation tests for the diagnosis of food allergy in children.用于诊断儿童食物过敏的嗜碱性粒细胞活化试验。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2009 Aug;39(8):1234-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.2009.03292.x. Epub 2009 Jun 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Asthma and Multi-Food Allergy Are Risk Factors for Oral Food Challenge Failure-A Single-Center Experience.哮喘和多种食物过敏是口服食物激发试验失败的危险因素——单中心经验
Nutrients. 2025 Aug 27;17(17):2769. doi: 10.3390/nu17172769.
2
Integrated Diagnostic Approach Using Basophil Activation Test and IgE Assays for Shrimp and Prawn Allergy.使用嗜碱性粒细胞活化试验和IgE检测对虾类过敏进行综合诊断的方法
Medicina (Kaunas). 2025 Jun 5;61(6):1040. doi: 10.3390/medicina61061040.
3
Application and research progress of artificial intelligence in allergic diseases.人工智能在过敏性疾病中的应用与研究进展
Int J Med Sci. 2025 Apr 9;22(9):2088-2102. doi: 10.7150/ijms.105422. eCollection 2025.
4
Biomarker-driven drug development for allergic diseases and asthma: An FDA public workshop.基于生物标志物的过敏性疾病和哮喘药物研发:美国食品药品监督管理局公开研讨会
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2025 Jun;155(6):1753-1766. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2025.03.014. Epub 2025 Mar 26.
5
Basophil Activation Test for the Improved Diagnosis of Peanut and Tree Nut Allergy.用于改进花生和坚果过敏诊断的嗜碱性粒细胞活化试验
Curr Allergy Asthma Rep. 2025 Mar 20;25(1):19. doi: 10.1007/s11882-025-01200-1.
6
Challenges in designing interventions for food insecure families with food allergy in a Californian latinx cohort.为加利福尼亚拉丁裔队列中患有食物过敏的粮食不安全家庭设计干预措施所面临的挑战。
Front Allergy. 2025 Jan 16;5:1389687. doi: 10.3389/falgy.2024.1389687. eCollection 2024.
7
Can artificial intelligence (AI) replace oral food challenge?人工智能(AI)能否取代口服食物激发试验?
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2024 Mar;153(3):666-668. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2024.01.008. Epub 2024 Jan 21.
8
Risk subgroups and intervention effects among infants at high risk for peanut allergy: A model for clinical decision making.高危婴儿花生过敏的风险亚组和干预效果:临床决策模型。
Clin Exp Allergy. 2024 Mar;54(3):185-194. doi: 10.1111/cea.14452. Epub 2024 Jan 19.
9
The Role of Biologics in the Treatment of Food Allergy.生物制剂在食物过敏治疗中的作用
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2024 Mar;12(3):562-568. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2023.11.032. Epub 2023 Nov 25.
10
Combining avidin with CD63 improves basophil activation test accuracy in classifying peanut allergy.结合亲和素与 CD63 可提高嗜碱性粒细胞激活试验对花生过敏分类的准确性。
Allergy. 2024 Feb;79(2):445-455. doi: 10.1111/all.15930. Epub 2023 Nov 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Efficacy and Safety of AR101 in Oral Immunotherapy for Peanut Allergy: Results of ARC001, a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase 2 Clinical Trial.AR101 在花生过敏口服免疫治疗中的疗效和安全性:ARC001 的结果,一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照的 2 期临床试验。
J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 Mar-Apr;6(2):476-485.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2017.09.016. Epub 2017 Oct 31.
2
Development of a prediction model for severe wheat allergy.严重小麦过敏预测模型的开发。
Pediatr Allergy Immunol. 2018 Feb;29(1):93-96. doi: 10.1111/pai.12806. Epub 2017 Oct 5.
3
Development of a prediction model for a severe reaction in cow's milk challenges.牛奶激发试验中严重反应预测模型的开发。
Allergol Int. 2017 Jul;66(3):493-494. doi: 10.1016/j.alit.2016.11.005. Epub 2016 Dec 23.
4
Novel baseline predictors of adverse events during oral immunotherapy in children with peanut allergy.花生过敏儿童口服免疫治疗期间不良事件的新型基线预测指标。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017 Mar;139(3):882-888.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.07.030. Epub 2016 Sep 5.
5
Assessing basophil activation by using flow cytometry and mass cytometry in blood stored 24 hours before analysis.在分析前储存24小时的血液中,通过流式细胞术和质谱流式细胞术评估嗜碱性粒细胞活化。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017 Mar;139(3):889-899.e11. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2016.04.060. Epub 2016 Jul 15.
6
Basophil activation test: food challenge in a test tube or specialist research tool?嗜碱性粒细胞活化试验:试管中的食物激发试验还是专业研究工具?
Clin Transl Allergy. 2016 Mar 15;6:10. doi: 10.1186/s13601-016-0098-7. eCollection 2016.
7
Development of a prediction model of severe reaction in boiled egg challenges.煮鸡蛋挑战中严重反应的预测模型的建立。
Allergol Int. 2016 Jul;65(3):293-9. doi: 10.1016/j.alit.2016.01.005. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
8
Pediatric emergency department visits and hospitalizations due to food-induced anaphylaxis in Illinois.因食物诱发的过敏反应而导致在伊利诺伊州的儿科急诊就诊和住院的情况。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2015 Jul;115(1):56-62. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2015.05.006.
9
Correlations between basophil activation, allergen-specific IgE with outcome and severity of oral food challenges.嗜碱性粒细胞活化与过敏原特异性 IgE 与口服食物挑战结果和严重程度的相关性。
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2015 Apr;114(4):319-26. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2015.01.006.
10
Distinct parameters of the basophil activation test reflect the severity and threshold of allergic reactions to peanut.嗜碱性粒细胞活化试验的不同参数反映了对花生过敏反应的严重程度和阈值。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2015 Jan;135(1):179-86. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2014.09.001.

开发一种预测花生挑战期间过敏反应严重程度的工具。

Development of a tool predicting severity of allergic reaction during peanut challenge.

机构信息

Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California; Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California; Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.

Sean N. Parker Center for Allergy and Asthma Research, Stanford University, Stanford, California; School of Medicine, Quantitative Sciences Unit, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.

出版信息

Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2018 Jul;121(1):69-76.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2018.04.020. Epub 2018 Apr 27.

DOI:10.1016/j.anai.2018.04.020
PMID:29709643
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6026554/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Reliable prognostic markers for predicting severity of allergic reactions during oral food challenges (OFCs) have not been established.

OBJECTIVE

To develop a predictive algorithm of a food challenge severity score (CSS) to identify those at higher risk for severe reactions to a standardized peanut OFC.

METHODS

Medical history and allergy test results were obtained for 120 peanut allergic participants who underwent double-blind, placebo-controlled food challenges. Reactions were assigned a CSS between 1 and 6 based on cumulative tolerated dose and a severity clinical indicator. Demographic characteristics, clinical features, peanut component IgE values, and a basophil activation marker were considered in a multistep analysis to derive a flexible decision rule to understand risk during peanut of OFC.

RESULTS

A total of 18.3% participants had a severe reaction (CSS >4). The decision rule identified the following 3 variables (in order of importance) as predictors of reaction severity: ratio of percentage of CD63 stimulation with peanut to percentage of CD63 anti-IgE (CD63 ratio), history of exercise-induced asthma, and ratio of forced expiratory volume in 1 second to forced vital capacity (FEV/FVC) ratio. The CD63 ratio alone was a strong predictor of CSS (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

The CSS is a novel tool that combines dose thresholds and allergic reactions to understand risks associated with peanut OFCs. Laboratory values (CD63 ratio), along with clinical variables (exercise-induced asthma and FEV/FVC ratio) contribute to the predictive ability of the severity of reaction to peanut OFCs. Further testing of this decision rule is needed in a larger external data source before it can be considered outside research settings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02103270.

摘要

背景

目前尚未建立可靠的预测标志物来预测口服食物挑战(OFC)期间过敏反应的严重程度。

目的

制定食物挑战严重程度评分(CSS)的预测算法,以识别那些对标准化花生 OFC 严重反应风险较高的患者。

方法

对 120 名接受双盲、安慰剂对照食物挑战的花生过敏参与者进行了病史和过敏试验结果的采集。根据累积耐受剂量和严重临床指标,将反应分配为 1 至 6 分的 CSS。在多步骤分析中考虑了人口统计学特征、临床特征、花生成分 IgE 值和嗜碱性粒细胞激活标志物,以得出灵活的决策规则,了解 OFC 期间食用花生的风险。

结果

共有 18.3%的参与者出现严重反应(CSS>4)。决策规则确定了以下 3 个变量(按重要性顺序)作为反应严重程度的预测因子:花生与抗 IgE 刺激 CD63 的百分比比值(CD63 比值)、运动诱发哮喘史和 1 秒用力呼气量与用力肺活量的比值(FEV/FVC 比值)。单独的 CD63 比值是 CSS 的一个强有力的预测因子(P<0.001)。

结论

CSS 是一种结合剂量阈值和过敏反应的新型工具,用于了解与花生 OFC 相关的风险。实验室值(CD63 比值)以及临床变量(运动诱发哮喘和 FEV/FVC 比值)有助于预测花生 OFC 反应的严重程度。在将该决策规则应用于研究环境之外之前,需要在更大的外部数据源中进一步测试。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT02103270。