• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非低血压性中度与重度高乳酸血症患者早期脓毒症集束化治疗的依从性

Early sepsis bundle compliance for non-hypotensive patients with intermediate versus severe hyperlactemia.

作者信息

Leisman Daniel E, Zemmel D'Amore Jason A, Gribben Jeanie L, Ward Mary Frances, Masick Kevin D, Bianculli Andrea R, Bradburn Kathryn H, D'Angelo John K, Doerfler Martin E

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine, Hofstra-Northwell School of Medicine, Hempstead, NY, United States; Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States.

Department of Emergency Medicine, Hofstra-Northwell School of Medicine, Hempstead, NY, United States.

出版信息

Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Jun;35(6):811-818. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.01.029. Epub 2017 Jan 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.ajem.2017.01.029
PMID:28126452
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the association of 3-h sepsis bundle compliance with hospital mortality in non-hypotensive sepsis patients with intermediate versus severe hyperlactemia.

METHODS

This was a cohort study of all non-hypotensive, hyperlactemic sepsis patients captured in a prospective quality-improvement database, treated October 2014 to September 2015 at five tertiary-care centers. We defined sepsis as 1) infection, 2) ≥2 SIRS criteria, and 3) ≥1 organ dysfunction criterion. "Time-zero" was the first time a patient met all sepsis criteria.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

systolic blood pressure>90 mmHg, mean arterial pressure>65 mmHg, and serum lactate≥2.2 mmol/L. Primary exposures: 1) intermediate(2.2-3.9 mmol/L) versus severe(≥4.0 mmol/L) hyperlactemia and 2) full 3-h bundle compliance. Bundle elements: The primary outcome was 60-day in-hospital mortality.

RESULTS

2417 patients met inclusion criteria. 704(29%) had lactate≥4.0 mmol/L versus 1775 patients with lactate 2.2-3.9 mmol/L. Compliance was 75% for antibiotics and 53% for fluids. Full-compliance was comparable between lactate groups (n=200(29%) and 488(28%), respectively). We observed 424(17.5%) mortalities: intermediate/non-compliant - 182(14.9%), intermediate/compliant - 41(8.4%), severe/non-compliant - 147(29.2%), severe/compliant - 54(27.0%) [difference-of-differences=4.3%, CI=2.6-5.9%]. In multivariable regression, mortality predictors included severe hyperlactemia (OR=1.99, CI=1.51-2.63) and bundle compliance (OR=0.62, CI=0.42-0.90), and their interaction was significant: p=0.022.

CONCLUSION

We observed a significant interaction between 3-h bundle compliance and initial hyperlactemia. Bundle compliance may be associated with greater mortality benefit for non-hypotensive sepsis patients with less severe hyperlactemia.

摘要

目的

比较在非低血压性脓毒症患者中,中度与重度高乳酸血症患者3小时脓毒症集束化治疗依从性与医院死亡率之间的关联。

方法

这是一项队列研究,纳入了前瞻性质量改进数据库中2014年10月至2015年9月在五个三级医疗中心接受治疗的所有非低血压性、高乳酸血症性脓毒症患者。我们将脓毒症定义为:1)感染,2)≥2条全身炎症反应综合征(SIRS)标准,以及3)≥1条器官功能障碍标准。“时间零点”是患者首次满足所有脓毒症标准的时间。

纳入标准

收缩压>90 mmHg,平均动脉压>65 mmHg,血清乳酸≥2.2 mmol/L。主要暴露因素:1)中度(2.2 - 3.9 mmol/L)与重度(≥4.0 mmol/L)高乳酸血症,以及2)3小时集束化治疗的完全依从性。集束化治疗要素:主要结局为60天院内死亡率。

结果

2417例患者符合纳入标准。704例(29%)乳酸≥4.0 mmol/L,1775例患者乳酸为2.2 - 3.9 mmol/L。抗生素依从率为75%,液体依从率为53%。乳酸组间的完全依从性相当(分别为n = 200例(29%)和488例(28%))。我们观察到424例(17.5%)死亡病例:中度/不依从 - 182例(14.9%),中度/依从 - 41例(8.4%),重度/不依从 - 147例(29.2%),重度/依从 - 54例(27.0%)[差异差值 = 4.3%,CI = 2.6 - 5.9%]。在多变量回归分析中,死亡率预测因素包括重度高乳酸血症(OR = 1.99,CI = 1.51 - 2.63)和集束化治疗依从性(OR = 0.62,CI = 0.42 - 0.90),且它们之间的相互作用具有显著性:p = 0.022。

结论

我们观察到3小时集束化治疗依从性与初始高乳酸血症之间存在显著的相互作用。对于高乳酸血症不太严重的非低血压性脓毒症患者,集束化治疗依从性可能与更大的死亡率获益相关。

相似文献

1
Early sepsis bundle compliance for non-hypotensive patients with intermediate versus severe hyperlactemia.非低血压性中度与重度高乳酸血症患者早期脓毒症集束化治疗的依从性
Am J Emerg Med. 2017 Jun;35(6):811-818. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2017.01.029. Epub 2017 Jan 15.
2
Survival Benefit and Cost Savings From Compliance With a Simplified 3-Hour Sepsis Bundle in a Series of Prospective, Multisite, Observational Cohorts.在一系列前瞻性、多中心、观察性队列研究中,遵循简化的3小时脓毒症集束化治疗方案所带来的生存获益和成本节约。
Crit Care Med. 2017 Mar;45(3):395-406. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000002184.
3
Resuscitation bundle compliance in severe sepsis and septic shock: improves survival, is better late than never.严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克中复苏集束化治疗的依从性:可提高生存率,亡羊补牢,为时未晚。
J Intensive Care Med. 2011 Sep-Oct;26(5):304-13. doi: 10.1177/0885066610392499. Epub 2011 Jan 10.
4
Multicenter Implementation of a Treatment Bundle for Patients with Sepsis and Intermediate Lactate Values.针对脓毒症和中度乳酸值患者的治疗集束方案的多中心实施
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2016 Jun 1;193(11):1264-70. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201507-1489OC.
5
Hyperlactatemia is an independent predictor of mortality and denotes distinct subtypes of severe sepsis and septic shock.高乳酸血症是死亡率的独立预测指标,且表明了严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克的不同亚型。
J Crit Care. 2015 Apr;30(2):439.e1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2014.10.027. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
6
Difference between elderly and non-elderly patients in using serum lactate level to predict mortality caused by sepsis in the emergency department.急诊科老年与非老年患者使用血清乳酸水平预测脓毒症所致死亡率的差异
Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Mar;97(13):e0209. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000010209.
7
Early recognition of sepsis through emergency medical services pre-hospital screening.通过急救医疗服务院前筛查早期识别脓毒症。
Am J Emerg Med. 2019 Aug;37(8):1428-1432. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.10.036. Epub 2018 Oct 20.
8
Serum lactate is associated with mortality in severe sepsis independent of organ failure and shock.血清乳酸水平与严重脓毒症患者的死亡率相关,且独立于器官功能衰竭和休克。
Crit Care Med. 2009 May;37(5):1670-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31819fcf68.
9
Implementation of a bundle of quality indicators for the early management of severe sepsis and septic shock is associated with decreased mortality.实施一系列用于严重脓毒症和脓毒性休克早期管理的质量指标与死亡率降低相关。
Crit Care Med. 2007 Apr;35(4):1105-12. doi: 10.1097/01.CCM.0000259463.33848.3D.
10
Association between hemodynamic presentation and outcome in sepsis patients.脓毒症患者血流动力学表现与预后之间的关联。
Shock. 2014 Sep;42(3):205-10. doi: 10.1097/SHK.0000000000000205.

引用本文的文献

1
The Frequency of POCUS in the Treatment of Sepsis in the Emergency Department: A Retrospective Cohort Study.急诊科床旁超声在脓毒症治疗中的应用频率:一项回顾性队列研究
POCUS J. 2023 Apr 26;8(1):71-80. doi: 10.24908/pocus.v8i1.15683. eCollection 2023.
2
An investigation of sepsis surveillance and emergency treatment on patient mortality outcomes: An observational cohort study.脓毒症监测与急诊治疗对患者死亡率影响的调查:一项观察性队列研究。
JAMIA Open. 2018 May 15;1(1):107-114. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooy013. eCollection 2018 Jul.
3
Initial clinical outcomes and prognostic variables in the implementation of a Code Sepsis in a high complexity University Hospital.
一所高复杂性大学医院实施脓毒症代码的初始临床结果及预后变量
Rev Esp Quimioter. 2019 Jun;32(3):238-245. Epub 2019 Apr 9.
4
Implementation of a whole of hospital sepsis clinical pathway in a cancer hospital: impact on sepsis management, outcomes and costs.在一家癌症医院实施全院脓毒症临床路径:对脓毒症管理、结局和成本的影响
BMJ Open Qual. 2018 Jul 6;7(3):e000355. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2018-000355. eCollection 2018.
5
Effect of Systematic Physician Cross-checking on Reducing Adverse Events in the Emergency Department: The CHARMED Cluster Randomized Trial.系统医生交叉核对对减少急诊科不良事件的影响:CHARMED 集群随机试验。
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Jun 1;178(6):812-819. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.0607.