Breast Cancer Now Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK.
Breast Cancer Now Research Unit, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, Guy's Hospital, London, UK.
Nat Med. 2018 May;24(5):628-637. doi: 10.1038/s41591-018-0009-7. Epub 2018 Apr 30.
Germline mutations in BRCA1/2 predispose individuals to breast cancer (termed germline-mutated BRCA1/2 breast cancer, gBRCA-BC) by impairing homologous recombination (HR) and causing genomic instability. HR also repairs DNA lesions caused by platinum agents and PARP inhibitors. Triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) harbor subpopulations with BRCA1/2 mutations, hypothesized to be especially platinum-sensitive. Cancers in putative 'BRCAness' subgroups-tumors with BRCA1 methylation; low levels of BRCA1 mRNA (BRCA1 mRNA-low); or mutational signatures for HR deficiency and those with basal phenotypes-may also be sensitive to platinum. We assessed the efficacy of carboplatin and another mechanistically distinct therapy, docetaxel, in a phase 3 trial in subjects with unselected advanced TNBC. A prespecified protocol enabled biomarker-treatment interaction analyses in gBRCA-BC and BRCAness subgroups. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR). In the unselected population (376 subjects; 188 carboplatin, 188 docetaxel), carboplatin was not more active than docetaxel (ORR, 31.4% versus 34.0%, respectively; P = 0.66). In contrast, in subjects with gBRCA-BC, carboplatin had double the ORR of docetaxel (68% versus 33%, respectively; biomarker, treatment interaction P = 0.01). Such benefit was not observed for subjects with BRCA1 methylation, BRCA1 mRNA-low tumors or a high score in a Myriad HRD assay. Significant interaction between treatment and the basal-like subtype was driven by high docetaxel response in the nonbasal subgroup. We conclude that patients with advanced TNBC benefit from characterization of BRCA1/2 mutations, but not BRCA1 methylation or Myriad HRD analyses, to inform choices on platinum-based chemotherapy. Additionally, gene expression analysis of basal-like cancers may also influence treatment selection.
BRCA1/2 种系突变通过损害同源重组 (HR) 并导致基因组不稳定,使个体易患乳腺癌(称为种系突变 BRCA1/2 乳腺癌,gBRCA-BC)。HR 还可修复铂类药物和 PARP 抑制剂引起的 DNA 损伤。三阴性乳腺癌 (TNBC) 存在 BRCA1/2 突变的亚群,推测对铂类药物特别敏感。BRCA1 甲基化;BRCA1 mRNA 水平低 (BRCA1 mRNA-low);或 HR 缺陷的突变特征和具有基底表型的肿瘤等所谓“BRCA 样”亚组中的癌症,也可能对铂类药物敏感。我们在一项针对未经选择的晚期 TNBC 患者的 3 期试验中评估了卡铂和另一种机制上不同的治疗药物多西他赛的疗效。一项预设方案允许在 gBRCA-BC 和 BRCAness 亚组中进行生物标志物-治疗相互作用分析。主要终点是客观缓解率 (ORR)。在未经选择的人群(376 例患者;卡铂 188 例,多西他赛 188 例)中,卡铂的活性不比多西他赛高(ORR 分别为 31.4%和 34.0%;P=0.66)。相比之下,在 gBRCA-BC 患者中,卡铂的 ORR 是多西他赛的两倍(分别为 68%和 33%;生物标志物-治疗相互作用 P=0.01)。对于 BRCA1 甲基化、BRCA1 mRNA-low 肿瘤或 Myriad HRD 检测中高评分的患者,未观察到这种益处。治疗与基底样亚型之间的显著相互作用是由非基底亚组中高多西他赛反应驱动的。我们得出结论,晚期 TNBC 患者受益于 BRCA1/2 突变的特征分析,但不受 BRCA1 甲基化或 Myriad HRD 分析的影响,以告知基于铂类的化疗选择。此外,基底样癌症的基因表达分析也可能影响治疗选择。