Suppr超能文献

石膏和树脂打印的数字模型的线性横向测量比较。

Comparison of linear transverse measures between plaster and resin printed digital models.

机构信息

Unit of Dentistry, Division of Orthodontics, Research area in Dentofacial Orthopedics and Orthodontics, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.

Private Practice, Pavia, Italy.

出版信息

J Biol Regul Homeost Agents. 2018 Mar-Apr;32(2 Suppl. 2):81-85.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to test for dimensional variations between plaster models recorded with alginate impression and printed 3D physical replicas from an .stl file digitized with an intra-oral scanner. Eighty arches (maxillary and mandibular) from 40 different patients were analyzed. Classic alginate impressions and digital recordings with an intraoral scanner were taken on the same day, for both arches of each patient. Digital recordings were then printed into resin models. The linear intercanine (IC) and intermolar (IM) distances were measured with a manual electronic caliper and then compared. The measurements were repeated twice for each distance to verify repeatability with the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). The Student’s t test for paired data was used to compare the two sets of impressions. The repeatability of the measures was assessed as ICC values were higher than 0.98. The values of the IC and IM lengths showed a statistically significant difference, but not clinically significant as it was less than 0.1 mm, between the two techniques.

摘要

本研究旨在检验藻酸盐印模记录与通过口内扫描仪数字化的.stl 文件打印的 3D 物理复制品之间的尺寸变化。 分析了来自 40 名不同患者的 80 个牙弓(上颌和下颌)。 当天对每个患者的每个牙弓进行了经典的藻酸盐印模和口内扫描仪的数字记录。 然后将数字记录打印成树脂模型。 使用手动电子卡尺测量线间犬齿(IC)和磨牙(IM)距离,然后进行比较。 对于每个距离重复测量两次,以用组内相关系数(ICC)验证可重复性。 使用配对学生 t 检验比较两组印模。 测量的可重复性评估为 ICC 值高于 0.98。 IC 和 IM 长度的值在两种技术之间存在统计学上显著差异,但临床意义不大,因为差异小于 0.1 毫米。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验