Department of Cardiology, Heart Center, Academic Medical Center - University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Cardiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
J Am Heart Assoc. 2018 May 2;7(10):e008609. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.008609.
Previous studies report conflicting results about a higher incidence of ventricular arrhythmias in patients with a chronic total coronary occlusion (CTO). We aimed to investigate this association in a large cohort of implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients with long-term follow-up.
All consecutive patients from 1992 onwards who underwent implantable cardioverter defibrillator implantation for ischemic cardiomyopathy at the Leiden University Medical Center were evaluated. Coronary angiograms were reviewed for the presence of a CTO. The occurrence of ventricular arrhythmias and survival status at follow-up were compared between patients with and patients without a CTO. A total of 722 patients constitute the study cohort (age 66±11 years; 84% males; 74% primary prevention, median left ventricular ejection fraction 30% [first-third quartile: 25-37], 44% received a cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator). At baseline, 240 patients (33%) had a CTO, and the CTOs were present for at least 44 (2-127) months. The median follow-up duration was 4 (2-6) years. On long-term follow-up, CTO patients had a higher crude appropriate device therapy rate (37% versus 27%, =0.010) and a lower crude survival rate (51% versus 67%, <0.001) compared with patients without a CTO. Corrected for baseline characteristics including left ventricular ejection fraction, the presence of a CTO was an independent predictor for appropriate device therapy.
The presence of a CTO in implantable cardioverter defibrillator patients was associated with more appropriate device therapy and worse prognosis at long-term follow-up. Further investigation is warranted regarding a potential beneficial effect of CTO revascularization on the incidence of ventricular arrhythmias.
先前的研究报告显示,慢性完全性冠状动脉闭塞(CTO)患者室性心律失常的发生率较高,但结果存在差异。我们旨在通过对接受植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD)治疗且长期随访的患者进行大样本队列研究,探讨这种相关性。
我们评估了 1992 年以来在莱顿大学医学中心因缺血性心肌病而接受 ICD 植入的所有连续患者。对冠状动脉造影进行了回顾,以确定是否存在 CTO。比较了 CTO 患者和非 CTO 患者之间室性心律失常的发生情况和随访时的生存状况。共有 722 例患者纳入研究队列(年龄 66±11 岁;84%为男性;74%为一级预防,中位左心室射血分数 30%[第 1-3 四分位数:25-37],44%接受心脏再同步治疗除颤器)。基线时,240 例患者(33%)存在 CTO,CTO 至少存在 44(2-127)个月。中位随访时间为 4(2-6)年。长期随访中,与非 CTO 患者相比,CTO 患者的粗适宜设备治疗率更高(37%比 27%,=0.010),粗生存率更低(51%比 67%,<0.001)。在校正包括左心室射血分数在内的基线特征后,CTO 的存在是适宜设备治疗的独立预测因素。
在 ICD 患者中,CTO 的存在与长期随访中更适宜的设备治疗和更差的预后相关。需要进一步研究 CTO 血运重建对室性心律失常发生率的潜在有益影响。