• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

心力衰竭患者的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:当前证据、完全血运重建的影响及改善预后的当代技术

PCI in Patients With Heart Failure: Current Evidence, Impact of Complete Revascularization, and Contemporary Techniques to Improve Outcomes.

作者信息

Ahmad Yousif, Petrie Mark C, Jolicoeur E Marc, Madhavan Mahesh V, Velazquez Eric J, Moses Jeffrey W, Lansky Alexandra J, Stone Gregg W

机构信息

Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.

University of Glasgow, Glasgow, Scotland.

出版信息

J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2022 Apr 11;1(2):100020. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100020. eCollection 2022 Mar-Apr.

DOI:10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100020
PMID:39132568
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11307477/
Abstract

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the most common cause of left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) and heart failure (HF). Revascularization with coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) reduces all-cause mortality compared with medical therapy alone for these patients. Despite this, CABG is performed in a minority of patients with HF, partly due to patient unwillingness or inability to undergo major cardiac surgery and partly due to physician reluctance to refer for surgery due to high operative risk. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is a less-invasive method of revascularization that has the potential to reduce periprocedural complications compared with CABG in patients with HF. Recent advances in PCI technology and technique have made it realistic to achieve more complete revascularization with PCI in high-risk patients with HF, although no randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) of PCI in HF compared with either medical therapy or CABG have been performed. In this review, we discuss the currently available evidence for PCI in HF and the association between the extent of revascularization and clinical outcomes in HF. We also review recent advances in PCI technology and techniques with the potential to improve clinical outcomes in HF. Finally, we discuss emerging clinical trial evidence of revascularization in HF and the large, persistent evidence gaps that should be addressed with future clinical trials of revascularization in HF.

摘要

冠状动脉疾病(CAD)是左心室收缩功能障碍(LVSD)和心力衰竭(HF)最常见的病因。与单纯药物治疗相比,冠状动脉旁路移植术(CABG)进行血运重建可降低这些患者的全因死亡率。尽管如此,接受CABG手术的HF患者仍占少数,部分原因是患者不愿或无法接受心脏大手术,部分原因是由于手术风险高,医生不愿推荐患者接受手术。经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)是一种侵入性较小的血运重建方法,与HF患者的CABG相比,它有可能减少围手术期并发症。尽管尚未进行与药物治疗或CABG相比的HF患者PCI随机对照临床试验(RCT),但PCI技术和技巧的最新进展已使在高危HF患者中通过PCI实现更完全的血运重建成为现实。在本综述中,我们讨论了目前HF患者PCI的现有证据以及血运重建程度与HF临床结局之间的关联。我们还回顾了PCI技术和技巧的最新进展,这些进展有可能改善HF的临床结局。最后,我们讨论了HF血运重建的新兴临床试验证据以及HF血运重建未来临床试验应解决的巨大且持续存在的证据空白。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebfe/11307477/1d15c346303e/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebfe/11307477/b152ed581387/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebfe/11307477/5feae9aa4cb8/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebfe/11307477/1887b4e313b4/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebfe/11307477/1d15c346303e/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebfe/11307477/b152ed581387/fx1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebfe/11307477/5feae9aa4cb8/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebfe/11307477/1887b4e313b4/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ebfe/11307477/1d15c346303e/gr3.jpg

相似文献

1
PCI in Patients With Heart Failure: Current Evidence, Impact of Complete Revascularization, and Contemporary Techniques to Improve Outcomes.心力衰竭患者的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:当前证据、完全血运重建的影响及改善预后的当代技术
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2022 Apr 11;1(2):100020. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2022.100020. eCollection 2022 Mar-Apr.
2
Current Landscape and Future Directions of Coronary Revascularization in Ischemic Systolic Heart Failure: A Review.缺血性收缩性心力衰竭中冠状动脉血运重建的现状与未来方向:综述
J Soc Cardiovasc Angiogr Interv. 2023 Dec 4;2(6Part B):101197. doi: 10.1016/j.jscai.2023.101197. eCollection 2023 Nov-Dec.
3
Enhanced External Counterpulsation (EECP): An Evidence-Based Analysis.增强型体外反搏(EECP):基于证据的分析。
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2006;6(5):1-70. Epub 2006 Mar 1.
4
Coronary artery bypass graft surgery vs percutaneous interventions in coronary revascularization: a systematic review.冠状动脉旁路移植术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗在冠状动脉血运重建中的比较:一项系统评价。
JAMA. 2013 Nov 20;310(19):2086-95. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.281718.
5
Stroke Rates Following Surgical Versus Percutaneous Coronary Revascularization.冠状动脉血运重建术后卒率比较:外科手术与经皮冠状动脉介入治疗。
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 Jul 24;72(4):386-398. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.04.071.
6
Left Main Coronary Artery Disease Revascularization According to the SYNTAX Score.左主干冠状动脉疾病血运重建术根据 SYNTAX 评分。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2019 Sep;12(9):e008007. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.118.008007. Epub 2019 Sep 9.
7
Clinical Outcomes of Patients with Coronary Artery Diseases and Moderate Left Ventricular Dysfunction: Percutaneous Coronary Intervention versus Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery.冠状动脉疾病合并中度左心室功能不全患者的临床结局:经皮冠状动脉介入治疗与冠状动脉旁路移植术的比较
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2021 Oct 15;17:1103-1111. doi: 10.2147/TCRM.S336713. eCollection 2021.
8
Balancing benefit against risk in the choice of therapy for coronary artery disease. Lesson from prospective, randomized, clinical trials of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery.冠状动脉疾病治疗选择中风险与获益的权衡。经皮冠状动脉介入治疗和冠状动脉旁路移植术前瞻性随机临床试验的经验教训。
Minerva Cardioangiol. 2003 Oct;51(5):585-97.
9
Comparative Effectiveness of Medical Therapy, Percutaneous Revascularization, and Surgical Coronary Revascularization in Cardiovascular Risk Subgroups of Patients With CKD: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Medicare Beneficiaries.在患有 CKD 的心血管风险亚组患者中,药物治疗、经皮血运重建和冠状动脉旁路移植术的比较效果:医疗保险受益人的回顾性队列研究。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2019 Oct;74(4):463-473. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2019.04.018. Epub 2019 Jun 27.
10
Heart failure patients with a previous coronary revascularization: results from the ESC-HF Registry.心力衰竭合并既往冠状动脉血运重建患者:ESC-HF 注册研究结果。
Kardiol Pol. 2018;76(1):144-152. doi: 10.5603/KP.a2017.0181. Epub 2017 Oct 5.

引用本文的文献

1
Association Between Revascularization and 30-Day Survival of Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Patients in Dr. Hasan Sadikin General Hospital.哈桑·萨迪金综合医院缺血性心肌病患者血运重建与30天生存率的关联
Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2025 Sep 3;21:719-728. doi: 10.2147/VHRM.S524863. eCollection 2025.
2
Navigating high-risk PCI with axillary impella support: a case report.经腋动脉置入Impella支持下的高危经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:一例报告
Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2025 Jul 18;87(8):5273-5276. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000003550. eCollection 2025 Aug.
3
Characteristics and Outcomes of Older Patients Undergoing Protected Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Impella.

本文引用的文献

1
Angiographic quantitative flow ratio-guided coronary intervention (FAVOR III China): a multicentre, randomised, sham-controlled trial.血管造影定量血流比指导的冠状动脉介入治疗(FAVOR III China):一项多中心、随机、假手术对照试验。
Lancet. 2021 Dec 11;398(10317):2149-2159. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02248-0. Epub 2021 Nov 4.
2
Fractional Flow Reserve-Guided PCI as Compared with Coronary Bypass Surgery.《血流储备分数指导下的 PCI 与冠状动脉旁路移植术的比较》。
N Engl J Med. 2022 Jan 13;386(2):128-137. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2112299. Epub 2021 Nov 4.
3
Prognostic value of coronary computed tomography angiographic derived fractional flow reserve: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
接受使用Impella进行的保护性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的老年患者的特征与结局
J Am Heart Assoc. 2025 May 6;14(9):e038509. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.124.038509. Epub 2025 Apr 16.
4
Intravascular Ultrasound Guiding Percutaneous Coronary Interventions in Complex Higher Risk-Indicated Patients (CHIPs): Insight from Clinical Evidence.血管内超声引导复杂高风险指征患者(CHIPs)的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗:来自临床证据的见解
Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Dec 18;25(12):443. doi: 10.31083/j.rcm2512443. eCollection 2024 Dec.
5
A Novel Approach to Identifying Hibernating Myocardium Using Radiomics-Based Machine Learning.一种基于放射组学的机器学习识别冬眠心肌的新方法。
Cureus. 2024 Sep 16;16(9):e69532. doi: 10.7759/cureus.69532. eCollection 2024 Sep.
6
Mortality rate after coronary revascularization in heart failure patients with coronary artery disease.冠心病心力衰竭患者冠状动脉血运重建术后死亡率。
ESC Heart Fail. 2023 Aug;10(4):2656-2663. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.14445. Epub 2023 Jun 27.
7
Myocardial Viability Testing in the Management of Ischemic Heart Failure.缺血性心力衰竭管理中的心肌存活检测
Life (Basel). 2022 Nov 1;12(11):1760. doi: 10.3390/life12111760.
基于冠状动脉 CT 血管造影的血流储备分数的预后价值:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Heart. 2022 Feb;108(3):194-202. doi: 10.1136/heartjnl-2021-319773. Epub 2021 Oct 22.
4
Five-year outcomes after state-of-the-art percutaneous coronary revascularization in patients with de novo three-vessel disease: final results of the SYNTAX II study.SYNTAX II 研究:经皮冠状动脉血运重建治疗初发三血管病变患者的 5 年结果:最终研究结果。
Eur Heart J. 2022 Mar 31;43(13):1307-1316. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab703.
5
Prevalence of Coronary Artery Disease and Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.射血分数保留的心力衰竭患者中的冠状动脉疾病和冠状动脉微血管功能障碍的患病率。
JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Oct 1;6(10):1130-1143. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2021.1825.
6
Operator Volumes and In-Hospital Outcomes: An Analysis of 7,740 Rotational Atherectomy Procedures From the BCIS National Database.术者操作量与院内结局:BCIS 国家数据库中 7740 例旋磨术的分析。
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Jul 12;14(13):1423-1430. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.04.034. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
7
Ten-Year All-Cause Death According to Completeness of Revascularization in Patients With Three-Vessel Disease or Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Insights From the SYNTAX Extended Survival Study.三血管病变或左主干病变患者完全血运重建后十年全因死亡情况:来自 SYNTAX 扩展生存研究的结果。
Circulation. 2021 Jul 13;144(2):96-109. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.046289. Epub 2021 May 20.
8
Long-term follow-up after ultrathin vs. conventional 2nd-generation drug-eluting stents: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.超薄型与传统第二代药物洗脱支架的长期随访:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Eur Heart J. 2021 Jul 15;42(27):2643-2654. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab280.
9
Standardizing the Definition and Analysis Methodology for Complete Coronary Artery Revascularization.冠状动脉完全血运重建的定义及分析方法标准化
J Am Heart Assoc. 2021 May 4;10(9):e020110. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.120.020110. Epub 2021 Apr 22.
10
Short-term and long-term outcomes of revascularization interventions for patients with severely reduced left ventricular ejection fraction: a meta-analysis.左心室射血分数严重降低患者血管重建干预的短期和长期结果:一项荟萃分析。
ESC Heart Fail. 2021 Feb;8(1):634-643. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13141. Epub 2020 Dec 3.