School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332
School of Psychology, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, Georgia 30332.
J Neurosci. 2018 May 30;38(22):5078-5087. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3484-17.2018. Epub 2018 May 2.
Visual metacognition depends on regions within the prefrontal cortex (PFC). Two areas in particular have been implicated repeatedly: the dorsolateral PFC (DLPFC) and the anterior PFC (aPFC). However, it is still unclear what the function of each of these areas is and how they differ from each other. To establish the specific roles of DLPFC and aPFC in metacognition, we used online transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to interfere causally with their functioning during confidence generation. Human subjects from both sexes performed a perceptual decision making and provided confidence ratings. We found a clear dissociation between the two areas: DLPFC TMS lowered confidence ratings, whereas aPFC TMS increased metacognitive ability, but only for the second half of the experimental blocks. These results support a functional architecture in which DLPFC reads out the strength of the sensory evidence and relays it to aPFC, which makes the confidence judgment by potentially incorporating additional, nonperceptual information. Indeed, simulations from a model that incorporates these putative DLPFC and aPFC functions reproduced our behavioral results. These findings establish DLPFC and aPFC as distinct nodes in a metacognitive network and suggest specific contributions from each of these regions to confidence generation. The prefrontal cortex (PFC) is known to be critical for metacognition. Two of its subregions, the dorsolateral PFC (DLPFC) and the anterior PFC (aPFC), have been specifically implicated in confidence generation. However, it is unclear whether these regions have distinct functions related to the underlying metacognitive computation. Using a causal intervention with transcranial magnetic stimulation, we demonstrate that DLPFC and aPFC have dissociable contributions: targeting DLPFC decreased average confidence ratings, whereas targeting aPFC affected metacognitive scores specifically. Based on these results, we postulated specific functions for DLPFC and aPFC in metacognitive computation and corroborated them using a computational model that reproduced our results. Our causal results reveal the existence of a specialized modular organization in PFC for confidence generation.
视觉元认知依赖于前额叶皮层(PFC)内的区域。两个特别重要的区域是背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)和前前额叶皮层(aPFC)。然而,目前尚不清楚这些区域的每个区域的功能是什么,以及它们彼此之间的差异是什么。为了确定 DLPFC 和 aPFC 在元认知中的特定作用,我们使用在线经颅磁刺激(TMS)在产生信心时对其功能进行因果干扰。来自两性的人类受试者进行了感知决策并提供了信心评分。我们发现这两个区域之间存在明显的分离:DLPFC TMS 降低了信心评分,而 aPFC TMS 提高了元认知能力,但仅在后半个实验块中。这些结果支持一种功能架构,其中 DLPFC 读取感觉证据的强度并将其传递给 aPFC,aPFC 通过潜在地合并其他非感知信息来做出信心判断。实际上,纳入这些假定的 DLPFC 和 aPFC 功能的模型模拟复制了我们的行为结果。这些发现将 DLPFC 和 aPFC 确立为元认知网络中的不同节点,并表明这些区域各自对信心产生的特定贡献。已知前额叶皮层(PFC)对元认知至关重要。它的两个子区域,背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)和前前额叶皮层(aPFC),具体与信心产生有关。然而,尚不清楚这些区域是否具有与基础元认知计算相关的不同功能。使用经颅磁刺激的因果干预,我们证明 DLPFC 和 aPFC 具有可分离的贡献:靶向 DLPFC 降低了平均信心评分,而靶向 aPFC 则专门影响元认知评分。基于这些结果,我们假设 DLPFC 和 aPFC 在元认知计算中具有特定的功能,并使用复制我们结果的计算模型对其进行了验证。我们的因果结果揭示了 PFC 中用于信心产生的专门模块化组织的存在。