Bor Daniel, Schwartzman David J, Barrett Adam B, Seth Anil K
Sackler Centre for Consciousness Science, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.
Department of Informatics, University of Sussex, Brighton, United Kingdom.
PLoS One. 2017 Feb 13;12(2):e0171793. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0171793. eCollection 2017.
Neuroimaging studies commonly associate dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and posterior parietal cortex with conscious perception. However, such studies only investigate correlation, rather than causation. In addition, many studies conflate objective performance with subjective awareness. In an influential recent paper, Rounis and colleagues addressed these issues by showing that continuous theta burst transcranial magnetic stimulation (cTBS) applied to the DLPFC impaired metacognitive (subjective) awareness for a perceptual task, while objective performance was kept constant. We attempted to replicate this finding, with minor modifications, including an active cTBS control site. Using a between-subjects design for both DLPFC and posterior parietal cortices, we found no evidence of a cTBS-induced metacognitive impairment. In a second experiment, we devised a highly rigorous within-subjects cTBS design for DLPFC, but again failed to find any evidence of metacognitive impairment. One crucial difference between our results and the Rounis study is our strict exclusion of data deemed unsuitable for a signal detection theory analysis. Indeed, when we included this unstable data, a significant, though invalid, metacognitive impairment was found. These results cast doubt on previous findings relating metacognitive awareness to DLPFC, and inform the current debate concerning whether or not prefrontal regions are preferentially implicated in conscious perception.
神经影像学研究通常将背外侧前额叶皮层(DLPFC)和顶叶后皮层与意识感知联系起来。然而,此类研究仅调查相关性,而非因果关系。此外,许多研究将客观表现与主观意识混为一谈。在最近一篇有影响力的论文中,鲁尼斯及其同事通过表明对DLPFC施加连续theta爆发式经颅磁刺激(cTBS)会损害对感知任务的元认知(主观)意识,同时保持客观表现不变,从而解决了这些问题。我们试图对这一发现进行复制,并做了一些小的修改,包括设置一个活跃的cTBS对照部位。针对DLPFC和顶叶后皮层,我们采用了被试间设计,未发现cTBS诱发元认知损伤的证据。在第二个实验中,我们为DLPFC设计了一个高度严格的被试内cTBS设计,但同样未发现任何元认知损伤的证据。我们的结果与鲁尼斯研究的一个关键差异在于,我们严格排除了被认为不适用于信号检测理论分析的数据。事实上,当我们纳入这些不稳定的数据时,发现了显著但无效的元认知损伤。这些结果对先前将元认知意识与DLPFC相关联的研究结果提出了质疑,并为当前关于前额叶区域是否在意识感知中具有优先牵连的争论提供了参考。