Suppr超能文献

医院获得性肺炎和呼吸机相关性肺炎指南的方法学质量:一项系统评价。

The methodological quality of guidelines for hospital-acquired pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia: A systematic review.

作者信息

Ambaras Khan R, Aziz Z

机构信息

Department of Pharmacy, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

出版信息

J Clin Pharm Ther. 2018 Aug;43(4):450-459. doi: 10.1111/jcpt.12696. Epub 2018 May 2.

Abstract

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVES

Clinical practice guidelines serve as a framework for physicians to make decisions and to support best practice for optimizing patient care. However, if the guidelines do not address all the important components of optimal care sufficiently, the quality and validity of the guidelines can be reduced. The objectives of this study were to systematically review current guidelines for hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), evaluate their methodological quality and highlight the similarities and differences in their recommendations for empirical antibiotic and antibiotic de-escalation strategies.

METHODS

This review is reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) statement. Electronic databases including MEDLINE, CINAHL, PubMed and EMBASE were searched up to September 2017 for relevant guidelines. Other databases such as NICE, Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN) and the websites of professional societies were also searched for relevant guidelines. The quality and reporting of included guidelines were assessed using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II (AGREE-II) instrument.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Six guidelines were eligible for inclusion in our review. Among 6 domains of AGREE-II, "clarity of presentation" scored the highest (80.6%), whereas "applicability" scored the lowest (11.8%). All the guidelines supported the antibiotic de-escalation strategy, whereas the majority of the guidelines (5 of 6) recommended that empirical antibiotic therapy should be implemented in accordance with local microbiological data. All the guidelines suggested that for early-onset HAP/VAP, therapy should start with a narrow spectrum empirical antibiotic such as penicillin or cephalosporins, whereas for late-onset HAP/VAP, the guidelines recommended the use of a broader spectrum empirical antibiotic such as the penicillin extended spectrum carbapenems and glycopeptides.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSIONS

Expert guidelines promote the judicious use of antibiotics and prevent antibiotic overuse. The quality and validity of available HAP/VAP guidelines would be enhanced by improving their adherence to accepted best practice for the management of HAP and VAP.

摘要

已知信息与目标

临床实践指南为医生做出决策以及支持优化患者护理的最佳实践提供了框架。然而,如果指南没有充分涵盖最佳护理的所有重要组成部分,那么指南的质量和有效性就会降低。本研究的目的是系统回顾当前关于医院获得性肺炎(HAP)和呼吸机相关性肺炎(VAP)的指南,评估其方法学质量,并突出它们在经验性抗生素治疗和抗生素降阶梯策略建议方面的异同。

方法

本综述按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明进行报告。截至2017年9月,对包括MEDLINE、CINAHL、PubMed和EMBASE在内的电子数据库进行检索以查找相关指南。还对其他数据库如英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)、苏格兰校际指南网络(SIGN)以及专业学会网站进行检索以查找相关指南。使用《研究与评价指南评估II》(AGREE-II)工具评估纳入指南的质量和报告情况。

结果与讨论

六项指南符合纳入本综述的标准。在AGREE-II的六个领域中,“表述清晰度”得分最高(80.6%),而“适用性”得分最低(11.8%)。所有指南均支持抗生素降阶梯策略,而大多数指南(6项中的5项)建议经验性抗生素治疗应根据当地微生物学数据实施。所有指南均表明,对于早发性HAP/VAP,治疗应起始于窄谱经验性抗生素,如青霉素或头孢菌素,而对于晚发性HAP/VAP,指南推荐使用更广谱的经验性抗生素,如青霉素类、超广谱碳青霉烯类和糖肽类。

新内容与结论

专家指南促进抗生素的合理使用并防止抗生素过度使用。通过提高对HAP和VAP管理公认最佳实践的遵循程度,可提高现有HAP/VAP指南的质量和有效性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验