• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

重度颅脑损伤后在线创伤性脑损伤预后皮质类固醇随机分组(CRASH)模型作为死亡率预测指标的可行性

Feasibility of Online Traumatic Brain Injury Prognostic Corticosteroids Randomisation After Significant Head Injury (CRASH) Model as a Predictor of Mortality.

作者信息

Faried Ahmad, Satriawan Ferry C, Arifin Muhammad Z

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran-Dr. Hasan Sadikin Hospital, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia.

Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Padjadjaran-Dr. Hasan Sadikin Hospital, Bandung, West Java, Indonesia.

出版信息

World Neurosurg. 2018 Aug;116:e239-e245. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.04.180. Epub 2018 May 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.wneu.2018.04.180
PMID:29730104
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of mortality in many countries. According to the World Health Organization, traffic crashes are a leading cause of death, with 1.25 million deaths worldwide in 2013. A 2013 global road safety report listed 68 low-to-middle income countries that had an increased mortality rate owing to traffic accidents. The aim of this study was to analyze feasibility of use of an online prognostic model from the Medical Research Council Corticosteroids Randomization After Significant Head Injury (CRASH) trial collaborators in our center.

METHODS

This is a cross-sectional retrospective study of 229 patients with TBI who were admitted to the Neurosurgery Unit at Dr. Hasan Sadikin Hospital, Bandung, from July to December 2016.

RESULTS

During the study period, 495 patients with TBI were admitted; 229 patients were included in the study. Several variables were analyzed using independent statistical methods before being included in the online CRASH calculator, including Glasgow Coma Scale score (P = 0.000), pupillary reaction to light (P = 0.000), major extracranial injury (P = 0.002), and interval following incidence (P = 0.000). Statistical analysis showed that the online CRASH prognostic model reliably predicted 14-day mortality rate (P = 0.000) with 91.6% sensitivity and 95.1% specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

The online CRASH model is a good prognostic model that can be used for patients with TBI in many developing countries.

摘要

背景

创伤性脑损伤(TBI)是许多国家死亡的主要原因。根据世界卫生组织的数据,交通事故是主要死因,2013年全球有125万人死亡。2013年的一份全球道路安全报告列出了68个中低收入国家,这些国家因交通事故导致的死亡率有所上升。本研究的目的是分析在我们中心使用医学研究理事会重度颅脑损伤后皮质类固醇随机试验(CRASH)合作者的在线预后模型的可行性。

方法

这是一项对229例TBI患者的横断面回顾性研究,这些患者于2016年7月至12月入住万隆哈桑·萨迪金医院神经外科。

结果

在研究期间,495例TBI患者入院;229例患者纳入研究。在纳入在线CRASH计算器之前,使用独立统计方法分析了几个变量,包括格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分(P = 0.00)、瞳孔对光反应(P = 0.00)、主要颅外损伤(P = 0.002)和发病后的时间间隔(P = 0.00)。统计分析表明,在线CRASH预后模型能够可靠地预测14天死亡率(P = 0.00),敏感性为91.6%,特异性为95.1%。

结论

在线CRASH模型是一个良好的预后模型,可用于许多发展中国家的TBI患者。

相似文献

1
Feasibility of Online Traumatic Brain Injury Prognostic Corticosteroids Randomisation After Significant Head Injury (CRASH) Model as a Predictor of Mortality.重度颅脑损伤后在线创伤性脑损伤预后皮质类固醇随机分组(CRASH)模型作为死亡率预测指标的可行性
World Neurosurg. 2018 Aug;116:e239-e245. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.04.180. Epub 2018 May 3.
2
Comparison of the CRASH Score-Predicted and Real Outcome of Traumatic Brain Injury in a Retrospective Analysis of 417 Patients.回顾性分析 417 例患者发现 CRASH 评分预测与创伤性脑损伤实际结果的比较。
World Neurosurg. 2020 May;137:e159-e165. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.01.118. Epub 2020 Jan 27.
3
Predicted Unfavorable Neurologic Outcome Is Overestimated by the Marshall Computed Tomography Score, Corticosteroid Randomization After Significant Head Injury (CRASH), and International Mission for Prognosis and Analysis of Clinical Trials in Traumatic Brain Injury (IMPACT) Models in Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Managed with Early Decompressive Craniectomy.在接受早期减压性颅骨切除术治疗的重度创伤性脑损伤患者中,Marshall计算机断层扫描评分、重度颅脑损伤后皮质类固醇随机试验(CRASH)以及创伤性脑损伤临床试验预后与分析国际任务组(IMPACT)模型对不良神经学预后的预测存在高估。
World Neurosurg. 2017 May;101:554-558. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.02.051. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
4
Clinical characteristics and prognosis of traumatic head injury following road traffic accidents admitted in ICU "analysis of 694 cases".重症监护病房收治的道路交通事故所致创伤性颅脑损伤的临床特征及预后:694例分析
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2019 Apr;45(2):245-253. doi: 10.1007/s00068-017-0885-4. Epub 2017 Dec 12.
5
A population-based study on epidemiology of intensive care unit treated traumatic brain injury in Iceland.冰岛基于人群的重症监护病房治疗创伤性脑损伤的流行病学研究。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2017 Apr;61(4):408-417. doi: 10.1111/aas.12869. Epub 2017 Feb 13.
6
Validation of a prognostic score for early mortality in severe head injury cases.严重颅脑损伤病例早期死亡率预后评分的验证
J Neurosurg. 2014 Dec;121(6):1314-22. doi: 10.3171/2014.7.JNS131874. Epub 2014 Sep 19.
7
Predicting in-hospital mortality after traumatic brain injury: External validation of CRASH-basic and IMPACT-core in the national trauma data bank.预测创伤性脑损伤后的院内死亡率:CRASH-basic 和 IMPACT-core 在国家创伤数据库中的外部验证。
Injury. 2021 Feb;52(2):147-153. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.10.051. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
8
Estimating prognosis for traumatic brain injury patients in a low-resource setting: how do providers compare to the CRASH risk calculator?在资源匮乏的环境中估算创伤性脑损伤患者的预后:提供者与 CRASH 风险计算器相比如何?
J Neurosurg. 2020 Apr 3;134(3):1285-1293. doi: 10.3171/2020.2.JNS192512. Print 2021 Mar 1.
9
Models of Mortality and Morbidity in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: An Analysis of a Singapore Neurotrauma Database.严重创伤性脑损伤的死亡率和发病率模型:对新加坡神经创伤数据库的分析
World Neurosurg. 2017 Dec;108:885-893.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.08.147. Epub 2017 Sep 1.
10
The Use of Corticosteroid Randomisation after Significant Head Injury (CRASH) Prognostic Model as Mortality Predictor of Traumatic Brain Injury Patients Underwent Surgery in Low-Middle Income Countries.在中低收入国家,使用重型颅脑损伤后糖皮质激素随机化(CRASH)预后模型作为接受手术的创伤性脑损伤患者死亡率的预测指标。
Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2024 Jun 21;2024:5241605. doi: 10.1155/2024/5241605. eCollection 2024.

引用本文的文献

1
A Meta-analysis of Predicting Disorders of Consciousness After Traumatic Brain Injury by Machine Learning Models.机器学习模型预测创伤性脑损伤后意识障碍的Meta分析。
Alpha Psychiatry. 2024 Jun 1;25(3):290-303. doi: 10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2024.231443. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
The Use of Corticosteroid Randomisation after Significant Head Injury (CRASH) Prognostic Model as Mortality Predictor of Traumatic Brain Injury Patients Underwent Surgery in Low-Middle Income Countries.在中低收入国家,使用重型颅脑损伤后糖皮质激素随机化(CRASH)预后模型作为接受手术的创伤性脑损伤患者死亡率的预测指标。
Anesthesiol Res Pract. 2024 Jun 21;2024:5241605. doi: 10.1155/2024/5241605. eCollection 2024.
3
Development and Verification of Prognostic Prediction Models for Patients with Brain Trauma Based on Coagulation Function Indexes.
基于凝血功能指标的颅脑创伤患者预后预测模型的建立与验证。
J Immunol Res. 2022 Jul 26;2022:3876805. doi: 10.1155/2022/3876805. eCollection 2022.
4
Toward a global and reproducible science for brain imaging in neurotrauma: the ENIGMA adult moderate/severe traumatic brain injury working group.为实现神经创伤性脑成像的全球性和可再现性科学:ENIGMA 成人中度/重度创伤性脑损伤工作组。
Brain Imaging Behav. 2021 Apr;15(2):526-554. doi: 10.1007/s11682-020-00313-7.
5
Correlation between the skull base fracture and the incidence of intracranial hemorrhage in patients with traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤患者颅底骨折与颅内出血发生率的相关性。
Chin J Traumatol. 2019 Oct;22(5):286-289. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2019.05.006. Epub 2019 Aug 16.
6
Update in Neurocritical Care: a summary of the 2018 Paris international conference of the French Society of Intensive Care.神经重症监护最新进展:法国重症监护学会2018年巴黎国际会议综述
Ann Intensive Care. 2019 Apr 16;9(1):47. doi: 10.1186/s13613-019-0523-x.