• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于凝血功能指标的颅脑创伤患者预后预测模型的建立与验证。

Development and Verification of Prognostic Prediction Models for Patients with Brain Trauma Based on Coagulation Function Indexes.

机构信息

Department of Neurosurgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China 450052.

Department of Critical Care Medicine, Zhengzhou Central Hospital Affiliated to Zhengzhou University, First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, China 450001.

出版信息

J Immunol Res. 2022 Jul 26;2022:3876805. doi: 10.1155/2022/3876805. eCollection 2022.

DOI:10.1155/2022/3876805
PMID:35928635
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC9345690/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of adding coagulation indices to the currently existing prognostic prediction models of traumatic brain injury (TBI) in the prediction of outcome.

METHODS

A total of 210 TBI patients from 2017 to 2019 and 131 TBI patients in 2020 were selected for development and internal verification of the new model. The primary outcomes include death at 14 days and Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) at 6 months. The performance of each model is evaluated by means of discrimination (area under the curve (AUC)), calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow (H-L) goodness-of-fit test), and precision (Brier score).

RESULTS

The IMPACT Core model showed better prediction ability than the CRASH Basic model. Adding one coagulation index at a time to the IMPACT Core model, the new combined models IMPACT Core+FIB and IMPACT Core+APTT are optimal for the 6-month unfavorable outcome and 6-month mortality, respectively (AUC, 0.830 and 0.878). The new models were built based on the regression coefficients of the models. Internal verification indicated that for the prediction of 6-month unfavorable outcome and 6-month mortality, both the IMPACT Core+FIB model and the IMPACT Core+APTT model show better discrimination (AUC, 0.823 vs. 0.818 and 0.853 vs. 0.837), better calibration (HL, = 0.114 and = 0.317) and higher precision (Brier score, 0.148 vs. 0.141 and 0.147 vs. 0.164), respectively, than the original models.

CONCLUSION

Our research shows that the combination of the traumatic brain injury prognostic models and coagulation indices can improve the 6-month outcome prediction of patients with TBI.

摘要

目的

评估在创伤性脑损伤(TBI)预后预测模型中加入凝血指标对结局预测的影响。

方法

选择 2017 年至 2019 年的 210 例 TBI 患者和 2020 年的 131 例 TBI 患者进行新模型的开发和内部验证。主要结局包括 14 天死亡和 6 个月格拉斯哥结局评分(GOS)。通过区分度(曲线下面积(AUC))、校准(Hosmer-Lemeshow(H-L)拟合优度检验)和精度(Brier 评分)评估每个模型的性能。

结果

IMPACT Core 模型的预测能力优于 CRASH Basic 模型。向 IMPACT Core 模型中依次添加一个凝血指标,新的组合模型 IMPACT Core+FIB 和 IMPACT Core+APTT 分别是 6 个月不良结局和 6 个月死亡率的最佳模型(AUC,0.830 和 0.878)。新模型是基于模型的回归系数构建的。内部验证表明,对于 6 个月不良结局和 6 个月死亡率的预测,IMPACT Core+FIB 模型和 IMPACT Core+APTT 模型的区分度(AUC,0.823 与 0.818 和 0.853 与 0.837)、校准(HL, = 0.114 和 = 0.317)和精度(Brier 评分,0.148 与 0.141 和 0.147 与 0.164)均优于原模型。

结论

本研究表明,将创伤性脑损伤预后预测模型与凝血指标相结合可以提高 TBI 患者 6 个月的预后预测能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9dc/9345690/64ed9d1eb57f/JIR2022-3876805.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9dc/9345690/b2718edadaff/JIR2022-3876805.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9dc/9345690/64ed9d1eb57f/JIR2022-3876805.002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9dc/9345690/b2718edadaff/JIR2022-3876805.001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/a9dc/9345690/64ed9d1eb57f/JIR2022-3876805.002.jpg

相似文献

1
Development and Verification of Prognostic Prediction Models for Patients with Brain Trauma Based on Coagulation Function Indexes.基于凝血功能指标的颅脑创伤患者预后预测模型的建立与验证。
J Immunol Res. 2022 Jul 26;2022:3876805. doi: 10.1155/2022/3876805. eCollection 2022.
2
Incremental Prognostic Value of Coagulopathy in Addition to the Crash Score in Traumatic Brain Injury Patients.凝血障碍对创伤性脑损伤患者除创伤评分外的预后价值的增量分析。
Neurocrit Care. 2021 Feb;34(1):130-138. doi: 10.1007/s12028-020-00991-7.
3
Predicting in-hospital mortality after traumatic brain injury: External validation of CRASH-basic and IMPACT-core in the national trauma data bank.预测创伤性脑损伤后的院内死亡率:CRASH-basic 和 IMPACT-core 在国家创伤数据库中的外部验证。
Injury. 2021 Feb;52(2):147-153. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.10.051. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
4
The application of adult traumatic brain injury models in a pediatric cohort.成人创伤性脑损伤模型在儿科队列中的应用。
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2016 Nov;18(5):558-564. doi: 10.3171/2016.5.PEDS15427. Epub 2016 Aug 26.
5
External validation of the CRASH and IMPACT prognostic models in severe traumatic brain injury.CRASH和IMPACT严重创伤性脑损伤预后模型的外部验证
J Neurotrauma. 2014 Jul 1;31(13):1146-52. doi: 10.1089/neu.2013.3003. Epub 2014 May 12.
6
Prediction of outcomes in traumatic brain injury: The IMPACT and CRASH prognostic models in a single neurosurgical center, Malaysia.颅脑创伤结局预测:马来西亚单一神经外科中心的 IMPACT 和 CRASH 预后模型。
J Neurosurg Sci. 2023 Jun;67(3):367-373. doi: 10.23736/S0390-5616.21.05249-8. Epub 2021 Mar 11.
7
Prognostic value of coagulation tests for in-hospital mortality in patients with traumatic brain injury.凝血检测对创伤性脑损伤患者住院死亡率的预后价值。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018 Jan 5;26(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0471-0.
8
Corticosteroid Randomization after Significant Head Injury and International Mission for Prognosis and Clinical Trials in Traumatic Brain Injury Models Compared with a Machine Learning-Based Predictive Model from Tanzania.大骨瓣开颅术后皮质类固醇随机分组与坦桑尼亚基于机器学习的创伤性脑损伤模型预后和临床试验国际合作比较。
J Neurotrauma. 2022 Jan;39(1-2):151-158. doi: 10.1089/neu.2020.7483. Epub 2021 Jun 10.
9
Predicting outcome after traumatic brain injury: development of prognostic scores based on the IMPACT and the APACHE II.预测创伤性脑损伤后的结果:基于IMPACT和急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统II(APACHE II)开发预后评分
J Neurotrauma. 2014 Oct 15;31(20):1721-32. doi: 10.1089/neu.2014.3361. Epub 2014 Aug 12.
10
Outcome Prediction after Moderate and Severe Traumatic Brain Injury: External Validation of Two Established Prognostic Models in 1742 European Patients.中度和重度创伤性脑损伤后的预后预测:1742例欧洲患者中两种既定预后模型的外部验证
J Neurotrauma. 2021 May 15;38(10):1377-1388. doi: 10.1089/neu.2020.7300. Epub 2020 Dec 14.

引用本文的文献

1
The role of coagulopathy and subdural hematoma thickness at admission in predicting the prognoses of patients with severe traumatic brain injury: a multicenter retrospective cohort study from China.凝血功能障碍和入院时硬膜下血肿厚度在预测中国严重创伤性脑损伤患者预后中的作用:一项多中心回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2024 Sep 1;110(9):5545-5562. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001650.
2
Comparative analysis of CRASH and IMPACT in predicting the outcome of 340 patients with traumatic brain injury.CRASH与IMPACT对340例创伤性脑损伤患者预后预测的比较分析
Transl Neurosci. 2024 Mar 22;15(1):20220327. doi: 10.1515/tnsci-2022-0327. eCollection 2024 Jan 1.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Predicting in-hospital mortality after traumatic brain injury: External validation of CRASH-basic and IMPACT-core in the national trauma data bank.预测创伤性脑损伤后的院内死亡率:CRASH-basic 和 IMPACT-core 在国家创伤数据库中的外部验证。
Injury. 2021 Feb;52(2):147-153. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2020.10.051. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
2
IMPACT and CRASH prognostic models for traumatic brain injury: external validation in a South-American cohort.创伤性脑损伤的影响和碰撞预测模型:在南美队列中的外部验证。
Inj Prev. 2020 Dec;26(6):546-554. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2019-043466. Epub 2020 Jan 20.
3
Coagulopathy after hemorrhagic traumatic brain injury, an observational study of the incidence and prognosis.
Prognostic Value of CRASH and IMPACT Models for Predicting Mortality and Unfavorable Outcome in Traumatic Brain Injury; a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
CRASH和IMPACT模型对预测创伤性脑损伤死亡率和不良结局的预后价值;一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Arch Acad Emerg Med. 2023 Mar 4;11(1):e27. doi: 10.22037/aaem.v11i1.1885. eCollection 2023.
颅脑创伤后出血性凝血病:发生率和预后的观察性研究。
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2020 Feb;162(2):329-336. doi: 10.1007/s00701-019-04111-z. Epub 2019 Nov 18.
4
Feasibility of Online Traumatic Brain Injury Prognostic Corticosteroids Randomisation After Significant Head Injury (CRASH) Model as a Predictor of Mortality.重度颅脑损伤后在线创伤性脑损伤预后皮质类固醇随机分组(CRASH)模型作为死亡率预测指标的可行性
World Neurosurg. 2018 Aug;116:e239-e245. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.04.180. Epub 2018 May 3.
5
Coagulopathy induced by traumatic brain injury: systemic manifestation of a localized injury.创伤性脑损伤引起的凝血功能障碍:局部损伤的全身表现。
Blood. 2018 May 3;131(18):2001-2006. doi: 10.1182/blood-2017-11-784108. Epub 2018 Mar 5.
6
Prognostic value of coagulation tests for in-hospital mortality in patients with traumatic brain injury.凝血检测对创伤性脑损伤患者住院死亡率的预后价值。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2018 Jan 5;26(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s13049-017-0471-0.
7
Is It Reliable to Predict the Outcome of Elderly Patients with Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Using the IMPACT Prognostic Calculator?使用IMPACT预后计算器预测老年重型颅脑损伤患者的预后是否可靠?
World Neurosurg. 2017 Jul;103:584-590. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.04.069. Epub 2017 Apr 19.
8
Guidelines for the Management of Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, Fourth Edition.《重型颅脑损伤管理指南(第四版)》
Neurosurgery. 2017 Jan 1;80(1):6-15. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0000000000001432.
9
Development of prognostic models for patients with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review.创伤性脑损伤患者预后模型的开发:一项系统综述
Int J Clin Exp Med. 2015 Nov 15;8(11):19881-5. eCollection 2015.
10
Time Course of Coagulation and Fibrinolytic Parameters in Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury.创伤性脑损伤患者凝血和纤溶参数的时间进程
J Neurotrauma. 2016 Apr 1;33(7):688-95. doi: 10.1089/neu.2015.4039. Epub 2015 Nov 20.