Rajih Emad, Burnett Arthur L
The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA; Urology Department, College of Medicine, Taibah University, Madinah, Saudi Arabia.
The James Buchanan Brady Urological Institute and Department of Urology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Sex Med. 2018 Sep;6(3):267-271. doi: 10.1016/j.esxm.2018.04.004. Epub 2018 May 2.
Penile structural defects can contribute toward penile prosthesis (PP) surgical complications and suboptimal outcomes. Despite modern improvements in techniques of inflatable PP (IPP) surgeries, suboptimal outcomes arise secondary to unrecognized proximal corporal abnormalities.
To describe a new observation of IPP failure (wobbly penis) secondary to proximal corporal deformities.
We performed a retrospective analysis of the Johns Hopkins institutional database of patients who had IPP surgery from May 2006 to March 2017. All cases requiring surgical revisions secondary to proximal corporal deformities were identified. Exclusion criteria included patients who had incidentally discovered proximal corporal deformities intraoperatively or were documented preoperatively to have had a corporal defect.
Successful reimplantation of a functionally intact PP device.
On clinical grounds, we identified 5 patients with properly cycling but unstable prosthetic devices that were associated with proximal corporal dilatation (proximally from the penoscrotal junction). All patients underwent reduction corporoplasty with prosthesis replacements consisting of controlled expansion IPPs. 3 patients had undergone previous device replacements because of intact cycling but unstable and unusable IPP devices, whereas 2 had a single previous device insertion. Mean age at revision was 67 years. Median IPP duration was 17 years. Median number of previous IPP surgeries was 3. All patients reported IPP stability and satisfaction after revision (median follow-up = 6 months).
Proximal corporal deformities could account for IPP failure. This condition can be under-recognized as observed in the present cases of multiple revisions with a normally cycling device that was not usable. Proper recognition of this problem allows the opportunity for surgical correction with reduction corporoplasty. Rajih E, Burnett AL. Penile Wobble Effect: Proximal Corporal Deformities as a Cause of Penile Prosthesis Failure. Sex Med 2018;6:267-271.
阴茎结构缺陷可导致阴茎假体(PP)手术并发症及效果欠佳。尽管可膨胀阴茎假体(IPP)手术技术在现代有所改进,但由于未识别出的近端海绵体异常,仍会出现效果欠佳的情况。
描述一种因近端海绵体畸形导致的IPP失败(阴茎晃动)的新观察结果。
我们对约翰霍普金斯机构数据库中2006年5月至2017年3月接受IPP手术的患者进行了回顾性分析。确定了所有因近端海绵体畸形而需要手术翻修的病例。排除标准包括术中偶然发现近端海绵体畸形或术前记录有海绵体缺陷的患者。
功能完好的PP装置成功重新植入。
基于临床情况,我们确定了5例假体装置循环正常但不稳定且与近端海绵体扩张(从阴茎阴囊交界处近端)相关的患者。所有患者均接受了缩窄性阴茎成形术并更换为可控扩张IPP的假体。3例患者因假体装置循环正常但不稳定且无法使用而曾接受过装置更换,而2例患者此前仅进行过一次装置植入。翻修时的平均年龄为67岁。IPP的中位使用时间为17年。此前IPP手术的中位次数为3次。所有患者在翻修后均报告了IPP的稳定性及满意度(中位随访时间 = 6个月)。
近端海绵体畸形可能是IPP失败的原因。如在本研究中多个循环正常但无法使用的装置多次翻修的病例中所观察到的,这种情况可能未得到充分认识。正确认识这一问题可为通过缩窄性阴茎成形术进行手术矫正提供机会。拉吉赫E,伯内特AL。阴茎晃动效应:近端海绵体畸形作为阴茎假体失败的原因。性医学2018;6:267 - 271。