Blix Ines, Kanten Alf Børre, Birkeland Marianne Skogbrott, Thoresen Siri
Norwegian Centre for Violence and Traumatic Stress Studies, Oslo, Norway.
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Front Psychol. 2018 Apr 20;9:515. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00515. eCollection 2018.
A growing body of research suggests that counterfactual thinking after traumatic events is associated with post-traumatic stress reactions. In this study we explored frequency of upward and downward counterfactuals in trauma-exposed individuals, and how trauma-related counterfactuals were represented in terms of vividness. We examined the relationships between vividness and frequency of counterfactual thoughts and post-traumatic stress reactions in two groups who had experienced different types of traumatic exposure, namely survivors and bereaved from the fire on the ferry Scandinavian Star in 1990. Even after 26 years, both survivors and bereaved reported that they currently entertained thoughts about what could have happened during the fire on Scandinavian Star. Survivors reported more downward counterfactuals than the bereaved, whereas the bereaved reported more upward counterfactuals than the survivors did. Vividness of counterfactual thoughts, as well as reported frequency of upward and downward counterfactuals, were associated with post-traumatic stress reactions. Our results suggest that both upward and downward counterfactuals can be harmful, and that vivid counterfactuals about a traumatic event might play a similar role in post-traumatic stress as trauma memories. Therefore, traumatized individuals who entertain counterfactual thoughts may benefit from interventions that target these thoughts specifically.
越来越多的研究表明,创伤事件后的反事实思维与创伤后应激反应有关。在本研究中,我们探讨了经历创伤的个体向上和向下反事实思维的频率,以及与创伤相关的反事实思维在生动程度方面是如何呈现的。我们考察了两组经历不同类型创伤暴露的人群,即1990年斯堪的纳维亚之星号渡轮火灾的幸存者和遇难者家属,反事实思维的生动程度和频率与创伤后应激反应之间的关系。即使在26年之后,幸存者和遇难者家属都表示,他们目前仍会思考在斯堪的纳维亚之星号渡轮火灾期间可能发生的事情。幸存者报告的向下反事实思维比遇难者家属更多,而遇难者家属报告的向上反事实思维比幸存者更多。反事实思维的生动程度,以及报告的向上和向下反事实思维的频率,都与创伤后应激反应有关。我们的研究结果表明,向上和向下反事实思维都可能有害,而且关于创伤事件的生动反事实思维在创伤后应激中可能与创伤记忆起到类似的作用。因此,怀有反事实思维的受创伤个体可能会从专门针对这些思维的干预措施中受益。