• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于不同感兴趣区域的扩散加权成像纹理分析在评估胶质瘤异质性中的应用

Texture analysis of diffusion weighted imaging for the evaluation of glioma heterogeneity based on different regions of interest.

作者信息

Wang Shan, Meng Meng, Zhang Xue, Wu Chen, Wang Ru, Wu Jiangfen, Sami Muhammad Umair, Xu Kai

机构信息

School of Medical Imaging, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221004, P.R. China.

Department of Radiology, Jiangsu Jiangyin People's Hospital, Jiangyin, Jiangsu 214400, P.R. China.

出版信息

Oncol Lett. 2018 May;15(5):7297-7304. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.8232. Epub 2018 Mar 12.

DOI:10.3892/ol.2018.8232
PMID:29731887
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5921227/
Abstract

The present study aimed to explore the role of texture analysis with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps based on different regions of interest (ROI) in determining glioma grade. Thirty patients with glioma underwent diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). ADC values were determined from the following three ROIs: i) whole tumor; ii) solid portion; and iii) peritumoral edema. Texture features were compared between high-grade gliomas (HGGs) and low-grade gliomas (LGGs) using the non-parametric Wilcoxon rank-sum test or the unpaired Student's t-test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were constructed to determine the optimum threshold for inhomogeneity values in discrimination of HGGs from LGGs. With a spearman rank correlation model, the aforementioned ADC inhomogeneity values were correlated with the Ki-67 labeling index. With whole tumor ROI, inhomogeneity values proved to be significantly different between HGGs and LGGs (P<0.001). With solid portion ROI, inhomogeneity and median values showed significant difference between HGGs and LGGs (P=0.001 and P=0.043, respectively). With peritumoral edema ROI, entropy and edema volume demonstrated positive results (P=0.016, P<0.001). The whole tumor inhomogeneity parameter performed with better diagnostic accuracy (P=0.048) than selecting the solid portion ROI. The association between inhomogeneity and Ki-67 labeling index was significantly positive in whole tumor and solid portion ROI (R=0.628, P<0.001 and R=0.470, P=0.009). Texture analysis of DWI based on different ROI can provide various significant parameters to evaluate tumor heterogeneity, which were correlated with tumor grade. Particularly, the inhomogeneity value derived from whole tumor ROI provided high diagnostic value and predicting the status of tumor proliferation.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨基于不同感兴趣区域(ROI)的表观扩散系数(ADC)图纹理分析在确定胶质瘤分级中的作用。30例胶质瘤患者接受了扩散加权成像(DWI)。从以下三个ROI确定ADC值:i)整个肿瘤;ii)实性部分;iii)瘤周水肿。使用非参数Wilcoxon秩和检验或不成对学生t检验比较高级别胶质瘤(HGG)和低级别胶质瘤(LGG)之间的纹理特征。构建受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线以确定区分HGG和LGG的不均匀性值的最佳阈值。使用Spearman秩相关模型,将上述ADC不均匀性值与Ki-67标记指数相关联。对于整个肿瘤ROI,HGG和LGG之间的不均匀性值被证明有显著差异(P<0.001)。对于实性部分ROI,HGG和LGG之间的不均匀性和中位数显示出显著差异(分别为P=0.001和P=0.043)。对于瘤周水肿ROI,熵和水肿体积显示出阳性结果(P=0.016,P<0.001)。整个肿瘤不均匀性参数的诊断准确性(P=0.048)优于选择实性部分ROI。在整个肿瘤和实性部分ROI中,不均匀性与Ki-67标记指数之间的关联显著为正(R=0.628,P<0.001和R=0.470,P=0.009)。基于不同ROI的DWI纹理分析可以提供各种重要参数来评估肿瘤异质性,这些参数与肿瘤分级相关。特别是,从整个肿瘤ROI得出的不均匀性值具有较高的诊断价值,并可预测肿瘤增殖状态。

相似文献

1
Texture analysis of diffusion weighted imaging for the evaluation of glioma heterogeneity based on different regions of interest.基于不同感兴趣区域的扩散加权成像纹理分析在评估胶质瘤异质性中的应用
Oncol Lett. 2018 May;15(5):7297-7304. doi: 10.3892/ol.2018.8232. Epub 2018 Mar 12.
2
Apparent diffusion coefficient measurement in glioma: Influence of region-of-interest determination methods on apparent diffusion coefficient values, interobserver variability, time efficiency, and diagnostic ability.胶质瘤中表观扩散系数的测量:感兴趣区确定方法对表观扩散系数值、观察者间变异性、时间效率及诊断能力的影响。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 Mar;45(3):722-730. doi: 10.1002/jmri.25405. Epub 2016 Aug 16.
3
Measurements of diagnostic examination performance using quantitative apparent diffusion coefficient and proton MR spectroscopic imaging in the preoperative evaluation of tumor grade in cerebral gliomas.使用定量表观扩散系数和质子磁共振波谱成像对脑胶质瘤术前肿瘤分级进行诊断检查性能的测量。
Eur J Radiol. 2011 Nov;80(2):462-70. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.07.017. Epub 2010 Aug 13.
4
Correlation Between Apparent Diffusion Coefficient and the Ki-67 Proliferation Index in Grading Pediatric Glioma.表观扩散系数与儿童脑胶质瘤分级中 Ki-67 增殖指数的相关性。
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2023;47(2):322-328. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0000000000001400.
5
Glioma: application of whole-tumor texture analysis of diffusion-weighted imaging for the evaluation of tumor heterogeneity.胶质瘤:扩散加权成像全肿瘤纹理分析在评估肿瘤异质性中的应用
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 30;9(9):e108335. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108335. eCollection 2014.
6
Diagnostic value of apparent diffusion coefficient in differentiating between high-grade gliomas and brain metastases.表观扩散系数在鉴别高级别胶质瘤与脑转移瘤中的诊断价值
Acta Radiol. 2018 May;59(5):599-605. doi: 10.1177/0284185117727787. Epub 2017 Aug 23.
7
Can whole-tumor apparent diffusion coefficient histogram analysis be helpful to evaluate breast phyllode tumor grades?全肿瘤表观扩散系数直方图分析能否有助于评估乳腺叶状肿瘤分级?
Eur J Radiol. 2019 May;114:25-31. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.02.035. Epub 2019 Feb 27.
8
Quantitative Assessment of Bladder Cancer Reflects Grade and Recurrence: Comparing of Three Methods of Positioning Region of Interest for ADC Measurements at Diffusion-weighted MR Imaging.膀胱癌的定量评估反映了分级和复发:比较三种在扩散加权磁共振成像中测量 ADC 值的感兴趣区定位方法。
Acad Radiol. 2019 Sep;26(9):1148-1153. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2018.10.016. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
9
Gliomas: Histogram analysis of apparent diffusion coefficient maps with standard- or high-b-value diffusion-weighted MR imaging--correlation with tumor grade.脑胶质瘤:标准或高 b 值扩散加权磁共振成像表观扩散系数图的直方图分析——与肿瘤分级的相关性。
Radiology. 2011 Dec;261(3):882-90. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11110686. Epub 2011 Oct 3.
10
An initial study on the predictive value using multiple MRI characteristics for Ki-67 labeling index in glioma.基于多种 MRI 特征对脑胶质瘤 Ki-67 标记指数的预测价值的初步研究。
J Transl Med. 2023 Feb 11;21(1):119. doi: 10.1186/s12967-023-03950-w.

引用本文的文献

1
Non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance urography for measuring split kidney function in pediatric patients with hydronephrosis: comparison with renal scintigraphy.非增强磁共振尿路造影测量小儿肾积水患者分肾功能:与肾闪烁显像的比较
Pediatr Nephrol. 2024 May;39(5):1447-1457. doi: 10.1007/s00467-023-06224-1. Epub 2023 Dec 2.
2
Quantitative MR texture analysis for the differentiation of uterine smooth muscle tumors with high signal intensity on T2-weighted imaging.基于 T2 加权像高信号的子宫平滑肌肿瘤的磁共振纹理定量分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Aug 4;102(31):e34452. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034452.
3
The feasibility of MRI texture analysis in distinguishing glioblastoma, anaplastic astrocytoma and anaplastic oligodendroglioma.磁共振成像纹理分析在鉴别胶质母细胞瘤、间变性星形细胞瘤和间变性少突胶质细胞瘤中的可行性。
Transl Cancer Res. 2022 Nov;11(11):4079-4088. doi: 10.21037/tcr-22-1390.
4
Preoperative and postoperative high angular resolution diffusion imaging tractography of cerebellar pathways in posterior fossa tumors.后颅窝肿瘤中小脑通路术前和术后高角度分辨率弥散成像示踪术。
Clin Anat. 2022 Nov;35(8):1085-1099. doi: 10.1002/ca.23914. Epub 2022 May 20.
5
Comparison of In Vivo and Ex Vivo Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a Rat Model for Glioblastoma-Associated Epilepsy.胶质母细胞瘤相关性癫痫大鼠模型中体内和体外磁共振成像的比较
Diagnostics (Basel). 2021 Jul 21;11(8):1311. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11081311.
6
Radiomic analysis of magnetic resonance fingerprinting in adult brain tumors.磁共振指纹成像在成人脑肿瘤中的放射组学分析。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2021 Mar;48(3):683-693. doi: 10.1007/s00259-020-05037-w. Epub 2020 Sep 26.
7
Progress of intravoxel incoherent motion diffusion-weighted imaging in liver diseases.体素内不相干运动扩散加权成像在肝脏疾病中的研究进展
World J Clin Cases. 2020 Aug 6;8(15):3164-3176. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v8.i15.3164.
8
A simple model for glioma grading based on texture analysis applied to conventional brain MRI.基于常规脑部 MRI 纹理分析的脑胶质瘤分级简单模型。
PLoS One. 2020 May 15;15(5):e0228972. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0228972. eCollection 2020.
9
Grading Gliomas Capability: Comparison between Visual Assessment and Apparent Diffusion Coefficient (ADC) Value Measurement on Diffusion-Weighted Imaging (DWI).胶质瘤分级能力:扩散加权成像(DWI)上视觉评估与表观扩散系数(ADC)值测量的比较
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2020 Feb 1;21(2):385-390. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.2.385.
10
Accuracy of ADC derived from DWI for differentiating high-grade from low-grade gliomas: Systematic review and meta-analysis.基于扩散加权成像(DWI)的表观扩散系数(ADC)对高级别与低级别胶质瘤的鉴别诊断准确性:系统评价与Meta分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Feb;99(8):e19254. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000019254.

本文引用的文献

1
Incidence trends in high-grade primary brain tumors in males and females.男性和女性高级别原发性脑肿瘤的发病率趋势。
Oncol Lett. 2017 Apr;13(4):2831-2837. doi: 10.3892/ol.2017.5770. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
2
Assessment of tissue heterogeneity using diffusion tensor and diffusion kurtosis imaging for grading gliomas.使用扩散张量成像和扩散峰度成像评估组织异质性以对胶质瘤进行分级。
Neuroradiology. 2016 Dec;58(12):1217-1231. doi: 10.1007/s00234-016-1758-y. Epub 2016 Oct 29.
3
Diagnostic performance of texture analysis on MRI in grading cerebral gliomas.MRI纹理分析在脑胶质瘤分级中的诊断性能
Eur J Radiol. 2016 Apr;85(4):824-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2016.01.013. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
4
ADC texture--an imaging biomarker for high-grade glioma?表观扩散系数纹理——高级别胶质瘤的一种成像生物标志物?
Med Phys. 2014 Oct;41(10):101903. doi: 10.1118/1.4894812.
5
Glioma: application of whole-tumor texture analysis of diffusion-weighted imaging for the evaluation of tumor heterogeneity.胶质瘤:扩散加权成像全肿瘤纹理分析在评估肿瘤异质性中的应用
PLoS One. 2014 Sep 30;9(9):e108335. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0108335. eCollection 2014.
6
Quantitative probabilistic functional diffusion mapping in newly diagnosed glioblastoma treated with radiochemotherapy.定量概率功能扩散映射在新诊断的胶质母细胞瘤放化疗中的应用。
Neuro Oncol. 2013 Mar;15(3):382-90. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nos314. Epub 2012 Dec 28.
7
Measurements of heterogeneity in gliomas on computed tomography relationship to tumour grade.脑肿瘤 CT 异质性测量与肿瘤分级的关系。
J Neurooncol. 2013 Jan;111(2):213-9. doi: 10.1007/s11060-012-1010-5. Epub 2012 Dec 6.
8
Assessment of tumor heterogeneity: an emerging imaging tool for clinical practice?肿瘤异质性评估:一种新兴的临床实用影像学工具?
Insights Imaging. 2012 Dec;3(6):573-89. doi: 10.1007/s13244-012-0196-6. Epub 2012 Oct 24.
9
Quantifying tumour heterogeneity in 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging by texture analysis.基于纹理分析的 18F-FDG PET/CT 成像中肿瘤异质性的量化。
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013 Jan;40(1):133-40. doi: 10.1007/s00259-012-2247-0. Epub 2012 Oct 13.
10
Imaging-based tumor treatment response evaluation: review of conventional, new, and emerging concepts.基于影像学的肿瘤治疗反应评估:常规、新型和新兴概念的综述。
Korean J Radiol. 2012 Jul-Aug;13(4):371-90. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2012.13.4.371. Epub 2012 Jun 18.