Kakietek Jakub
1 World Bank, Health, Nutrition, and Population Global Practice, Washington, DC, USA.
Food Nutr Bull. 2018 Sep;39(3):435-448. doi: 10.1177/0379572118767149. Epub 2018 May 6.
A therapy based on ready-to-use therapeutic food (RUTF) in outpatient settings is considered the gold standard in the treatment of severe acute malnutrition in children younger than 5 years. The price of RUTF is the key cost driver of the therapy. However, no studies to date have systematically examined the determinants of RUTF prices.
This article presents the first analysis of factors associated with the prices of RUTF, focusing on the impact of competition and tendering.
This article examines data on the prices of RUTF purchased by UNICEF Supply Division from 2006 through 2015 (90% of RUTF purchased globally). To assess the association between price, competition, and tender introduction, controlling for potential confounding factors, regression analysis using a generalized estimating equation was used.
Competition, measured as the number of suppliers, was negatively associated with RUTF price. On the other hand, no statistically significant association was found between RUTF price tendering. Quantities sold were also significantly associated with RUTF prices.
Significant price reductions have been achieved by increasing competition in the RUTF market. In contrast, introduction of tendering did not result in decreases in prices. Tendering is an effective price-lowering mechanism because it awards the bidder(s) with the lowest price with market exclusivity. However, the current tender system promotes market fragmentation and reduces the incentives for price reductions. Further reduction in RUTF prices can likely be achieved by modifying the current tendering procedures and putting a greater emphasis on price competition.
基于即食治疗性食品(RUTF)的门诊治疗方案被视为治疗5岁以下儿童重度急性营养不良的金标准。RUTF的价格是该治疗方案的主要成本驱动因素。然而,迄今为止尚无研究系统地考察RUTF价格的决定因素。
本文首次分析了与RUTF价格相关的因素,重点关注竞争和招标的影响。
本文研究了联合国儿童基金会供应司2006年至2015年购买的RUTF价格数据(占全球RUTF采购量的90%)。为了评估价格、竞争和招标引入之间控制潜在混杂因素后的关联,使用了广义估计方程的回归分析。
以供应商数量衡量的竞争与RUTF价格呈负相关。另一方面,未发现RUTF价格与招标之间存在统计学上的显著关联。销售量也与RUTF价格显著相关。
通过增加RUTF市场的竞争已实现大幅降价。相比之下,引入招标并未导致价格下降。招标是一种有效的降价机制,因为它将市场独家权授予出价最低的投标人。然而,当前的招标系统加剧了市场分割,降低了降价的激励。通过修改当前的招标程序并更加强调价格竞争,可能进一步降低RUTF价格。