Beijing Key Laboratory of Farmland Soil Pollution Prevention and Remediation, College of Resources and Environmental Science, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China.
State Key Laboratory of Atmospheric Boundary Layer Physics and Atmospheric Chemistry (LAPC), Institute of Atmospheric Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100029, China.
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2018 Sep 15;159:120-126. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2018.04.069. Epub 2018 May 4.
This study investigated the occurrence and sources of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) from arable soils in Beijing and compared them with 4 other types of soils: soil from uncultivated land, an incineration plant, a suburb and a woodland. The total concentrations of PAHs ranged from 189.3 to 888.7 μg/kg (mean: 518.2 μg/kg for greenhouses and 455.2 μg/kg for fields). The seven carcinogenic PAHs accounted for 11.2-81.3% of Σ15PAHs in arable soils. Benzo[a]pyrene toxic equivalent (BaP) concentrations were 82.8 μg/kg and 85.4 μg/kg in greenhouses and fields, respectively. Greenhouses and fields were both dominated by PAHs with 3 and 4 rings. Acenaphthene (ACE), indeno[1,2,3-cd] pyrene (IcdP) and benzo[ghi]perylene (BghiP) were the major compounds. These results showed that there was insignificant difference between the soil from greenhouses and fields and both had low carcinogenic potential risk. The diagnostic ratios suggested that the arable soils were mainly contaminated by coal/biomass combustion. Based on a positive matrix factorization (PMF) model, six sources were identified including coal combustion, waste incineration, tar, diesel combustion, biomass burning and gasoline combustion. Coal and gasoline combustion contributed over 40% of the measured PAHs in arable soils. Diesel combustion, tar and waste incineration were the main sources of pollution for soil from the uncultivated land, woodland and incineration plant/suburban. It was concluded that PMF was effective in determining the source apportionment. Urbanization and the evolution of human activities have caused PAH sources to become more complicated in industrial areas compared to regions with little human disturbance. Because of this, various factors need to be considered to control the PAH contamination in arable soils.
本研究调查了北京耕地土壤中多环芳烃(PAHs)的发生和来源,并将其与其他 4 种土壤(未开垦土地、焚烧厂、郊区和林地)进行了比较。PAHs 的总浓度范围为 189.3 至 888.7μg/kg(温室土壤的平均值为 518.2μg/kg,农田土壤的平均值为 455.2μg/kg)。7 种致癌 PAHs 占耕地土壤中Σ15PAHs 的 11.2-81.3%。温室和农田土壤中的苯并[a]芘毒性当量(BaP)浓度分别为 82.8μg/kg 和 85.4μg/kg。温室和农田土壤均以 3 环和 4 环 PAHs 为主。苊(ACE)、茚并[1,2,3-cd]芘(IcdP)和苯并[ghi]苝(BghiP)为主要化合物。这些结果表明,温室土壤和农田土壤之间没有显著差异,且均具有低致癌风险。诊断比值表明,耕地土壤主要受到煤/生物质燃烧的污染。基于正定矩阵因子分解(PMF)模型,确定了 6 种来源,包括煤燃烧、废物焚烧、焦油、柴油燃烧、生物质燃烧和汽油燃烧。煤和汽油燃烧对耕地土壤中测量到的 PAHs 的贡献率超过 40%。柴油燃烧、焦油和废物焚烧是未开垦土地、林地和焚烧厂/郊区土壤污染的主要来源。研究表明,PMF 能够有效地确定源解析。与人类干扰较小的地区相比,工业地区的城市化和人类活动的演变使 PAH 来源变得更加复杂。因此,需要考虑各种因素来控制耕地土壤中的 PAH 污染。