Santo Giulia, Laudicella Riccardo, Linguanti Flavia, Nappi Anna Giulia, Abenavoli Elisabetta, Vergura Vittoria, Rubini Giuseppe, Sciagrà Roberto, Arnone Gaspare, Schillaci Orazio, Minutoli Fabio, Baldari Sergio, Quartuccio Natale, Bisdas Sotirios
Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine, University of Bari Aldo Moro, 70124 Bari, Italy.
Nuclear Medicine Unit, Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morpho-Functional Imaging, University of Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Mar 29;12(4):844. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12040844.
In this comprehensive review we present an update on the most relevant studies evaluating the utility of amino acid PET radiotracers for the evaluation of glioma recurrence as compared to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
A literature search extended until June 2020 on the PubMed/MEDLINE literature database was conducted using the terms "high-grade glioma", "glioblastoma", "brain tumors", "positron emission tomography", "PET", "amino acid PET", "[C]methyl-l-methionine", "[F]fluoroethyl-tyrosine", "[F]fluoro-l-dihydroxy-phenylalanine", "MET", "FET", "DOPA", "magnetic resonance imaging", "MRI", "advanced MRI", "magnetic resonance spectroscopy", "perfusion-weighted imaging", "diffusion-weighted imaging", "MRS", "PWI", "DWI", "hybrid PET/MR", "glioma recurrence", "pseudoprogression", "PSP", "treatment-related change", and "radiation necrosis" alone and in combination. Only original articles edited in English and about humans with at least 10 patients were included.
Forty-four articles were finally selected. Conventional amino acid PET tracers were demonstrated to be reliable diagnostic techniques in differentiating tumor recurrence thanks to their high uptake from tumor tissue and low background in normal grey matter, giving additional and early information to standard modalities. Among them, MET-PET seems to present the highest diagnostic value but its use is limited to on-site cyclotron facilities. [F]labelled amino acids, such as FDOPA and FET, were developed to provide a more suitable PET tracer for routine clinical applications, and demonstrated similar diagnostic performance. When compared to the gold standard MRI, amino acid PET provides complementary and comparable information to standard modalities and seems to represent an essential tool in the differentiation between tumor recurrence and other entities such as pseudoprogression, radiation necrosis, and pseudoresponse.
Despite the introduction of new advanced imaging techniques, the diagnosis of glioma recurrence remains challenging. In this scenario, the growing knowledge about imaging techniques and analysis, such as the combined PET/MRI and the application of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML), could represent promising tools to face this difficult and debated clinical issue.
在本综述中,我们对评估氨基酸正电子发射断层扫描(PET)放射性示踪剂与磁共振成像(MRI)相比在评估胶质瘤复发方面效用的最相关研究进行了更新。
在PubMed/MEDLINE文献数据库中进行文献检索,检索截止至2020年6月,检索词为“高级别胶质瘤”“胶质母细胞瘤”“脑肿瘤”“正电子发射断层扫描”“PET”“氨基酸PET”“[C]甲基 - L - 蛋氨酸”“[F]氟乙基 - 酪氨酸”“[F]氟 - L - 二羟基苯丙氨酸”“MET”“FET”“多巴”“磁共振成像”“MRI”“先进MRI”“磁共振波谱”“灌注加权成像”“扩散加权成像”“MRS”“PWI”“DWI”“PET/MR混合成像”“胶质瘤复发”“假性进展”“PSP”“治疗相关变化”和“放射性坏死”,单独及组合使用这些检索词。仅纳入以英文编辑的、关于人类且至少有10例患者的原创文章。
最终选定44篇文章。传统氨基酸PET示踪剂因其在肿瘤组织中的高摄取和正常灰质中的低背景,被证明是区分肿瘤复发的可靠诊断技术,可为标准检查方式提供额外的早期信息。其中,MET - PET似乎具有最高的诊断价值,但其使用仅限于有现场回旋加速器设备的场所。[F]标记的氨基酸,如FDOPA和FET,被开发用于提供更适合常规临床应用的PET示踪剂,并显示出相似的诊断性能。与金标准MRI相比,氨基酸PET可提供与标准检查方式互补且可比的信息,似乎是区分肿瘤复发与其他实体(如假性进展、放射性坏死和假反应)的重要工具。
尽管引入了新的先进成像技术,但胶质瘤复发的诊断仍然具有挑战性。在这种情况下,对成像技术和分析(如PET/MR联合以及人工智能(AI)和机器学习(ML)的应用)的不断了解,可能是应对这一困难且存在争议的临床问题的有前景的工具。