Zhou Jianan, Hou Zujun, Guan Xiuqi, Zhu Zhengyang, Wang Han, Wang Cong, Luo Wei, Tian Chuanshuai, Yang Huiquan, Ye Meiping, Chen Sixuan, Zhang Xin, Zhang Bing
Department of Radiology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital Clinical College of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, China.
Institute of Medical Imaging and Artificial Intelligence, Nanjing University, Nanjing, China.
Front Oncol. 2025 Apr 16;15:1536122. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1536122. eCollection 2025.
The purpose of this study was to investigate the diagnostic value of advanced tracer kinetic models (TKMs) in differentiating HGGs recurrence and treatment response.
A total of 52 HGGs were included. DCE images were analyzed using the following TKMs: distributed parameter (DP), tissue homogeneity (TH), Brix's two-compartment (Brix) and extended-Tofts model (ETM), yielding the following parameters: cerebral blood flow (CBF), mean transit time (MTT), plasma volume (V), extravascular volume (V), vascular permeability (PS) and first-pass extraction ratio (E) in advanced TKMs (DP, TH and Brix); K, V, V and K in ETM. Two delineation methods were conducted (routine scans and parameter heat maps). The differences between two MRI scanners were compared. Mann-Whitney U test was used to assess the difference of parameter values. Diagnostic performance was assessed using the method of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, with the areas under the ROC curves (AUC) to determine the discriminating power of DCE parameters between recurrent tumor group and treatment response group . <0.05 indicates statistical significance.
The difference on the normalized kinetic parameter value (with respect to contralateral normal-appearing white matter) between two MRI scanners was statistically insignificant (>0.05). MTT and V of advanced TKMs were higher in recurrent than in treatment response group (<0.05). For ROI delineated on parameter heat maps, MTT(DP) attained the best performance with AUC 0.88, followed by MTT(TH) and V (DP, Brix) with AUCs around 0.80 (0.81, 0.80, 0.79 respectively). The best performance in ETM was V (AUC = 0.73).
MTT (DP, TH), and V (DP, Brix) could be potential quantitative imaging biomarkers in distinguishing recurrence and treatment response in HGGs.
本研究旨在探讨先进的示踪剂动力学模型(TKMs)在鉴别高级别胶质瘤(HGGs)复发和治疗反应方面的诊断价值。
共纳入52例HGGs患者。使用以下TKMs分析动态对比增强(DCE)图像:分布参数(DP)、组织均匀性(TH)、布里克双室模型(Brix)和扩展Tofts模型(ETM),得出以下参数:高级TKMs(DP、TH和Brix)中的脑血流量(CBF)、平均通过时间(MTT)、血容量(V)、血管外容积(V)、血管通透性(PS)和首过提取率(E);ETM中的K、V、V和K。采用两种勾画方法(常规扫描和参数热图)。比较了两台磁共振成像(MRI)扫描仪之间的差异。采用曼-惠特尼U检验评估参数值的差异。使用受试者操作特征(ROC)曲线方法评估诊断性能,通过ROC曲线下面积(AUC)确定DCE参数在复发肿瘤组和治疗反应组之间的鉴别能力。P<0.05表示具有统计学意义。
两台MRI扫描仪之间归一化动力学参数值(相对于对侧正常白质)的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。高级TKMs的MTT和V在复发组高于治疗反应组(P<0.05)。对于在参数热图上勾画的感兴趣区(ROI),MTT(DP)的表现最佳,AUC为0.88,其次是MTT(TH)和V(DP、Brix),AUC约为0.80(分别为(0.81)、(0.80)、(0.79))。ETM中表现最佳的是V(AUC = 0.73)。
MTT(DP、TH)和V(DP、Brix)可能是鉴别HGGs复发和治疗反应的潜在定量成像生物标志物。