Department of Psychology and Institute for Neuroscience, University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
Department of Psychology and Zlotowski Center for Neuroscience, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018 Jul;1424(1):33-44. doi: 10.1111/nyas.13714. Epub 2018 May 9.
What happens to goal-relevant information in working memory after it is no longer needed? Here, we review evidence for a selective removal process that operates on outdated information to limit working memory load and hence facilitates the maintenance of goal-relevant information. Removal alters the representations of irrelevant content so as to reduce access to it, thereby improving access to the remaining relevant content and also facilitating the encoding of new information. Both behavioral and neural evidence support the existence of a removal process that is separate from forgetting due to decay or interference. We discuss the potential mechanisms involved in removal and characterize the time course and duration of the process. In doing so, we propose the existence of two forms of removal: one is temporary, and reversible, which modifies working memory content without impacting content-to-context bindings, and another is permanent, which unbinds the content from its context in working memory (without necessarily impacting long-term forgetting). Finally, we discuss limitations on removal and prescribe conditions for evaluating evidence for or against this process.
工作记忆中不再需要的目标相关信息会发生什么?在这里,我们回顾了证据,证明存在一种选择性的清除过程,该过程对过时的信息进行操作,以限制工作记忆的负荷,从而有助于维持目标相关信息。清除会改变不相关内容的表示,从而减少对其的访问,从而提高对剩余相关内容的访问,并有助于新信息的编码。行为和神经证据都支持存在一种清除过程,该过程与因衰减或干扰而导致的遗忘不同。我们讨论了清除过程中涉及的潜在机制,并描述了该过程的时间进程和持续时间。这样,我们提出了两种形式的清除:一种是暂时的和可逆的,它修改工作记忆内容而不影响内容到上下文的绑定,另一种是永久的,它将内容从工作记忆中的上下文分离(不一定影响长期遗忘)。最后,我们讨论了清除的限制,并规定了评估该过程的证据的条件。