• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

直接前路全髋关节置换术的伤口并发症或感染会更多吗?

Are there more wound complications or infections with direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty?

作者信息

Tissot Christophe, Vautrin Matthias, Luyet Anais, Borens Olivier

机构信息

1 Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland.

2 Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Ensemble Hospitalier du Nord Vaudois, Yverdon Hospital, Yverdon, Switzerland.

出版信息

Hip Int. 2018 Nov;28(6):591-598. doi: 10.1177/1120700018759617. Epub 2018 May 9.

DOI:10.1177/1120700018759617
PMID:29742932
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Compared to a lateral or posterior approach (PA), the direct anterior approach (DAA) does permit a better muscle preservation for total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, there is concern whether this advantage come with increased wound complication and infection leading to reoperation or sometimes major procedures.

METHOD

We retrospectively reviewed all patients who underwent primary THA through the PA between January 2009 and April 2013 ( n = 796) and through the DAA between January 2011 and April 2013 ( n = 399) at our institution with a minimum of 2 years follow up regarding all wound complications and all infections.

RESULTS

Of the 796 patients in the PA group, there were 6 wound complications leading to reoperation and 6 infections; 4 early and 2 delayed onset. Among the infected cases, one was obese (body mass index [BMI] >30 kg/m2). Two procedures were teaching-based. Of the 399 patients in the DAA group, there were three dehiscences leading to reoperation, two of which were in obese patients. 6 infections were also found; 4 with early and 2 with delayed onset. Of the infected cases, three were obese. 4 procedures were teaching-based.

CONCLUSION

In our series of patients undergoing THA, the DAA did not increase the rates of either wound complications leading to reoperation nor early or delayed infection compared to the PA.

摘要

引言

与外侧或后侧入路(PA)相比,直接前路入路(DAA)在全髋关节置换术(THA)中确实能更好地保留肌肉。然而,人们担心这种优势是否会伴随着伤口并发症和感染的增加,从而导致再次手术,有时甚至是大手术。

方法

我们回顾性分析了2009年1月至2013年4月在我院通过PA进行初次THA的所有患者(n = 796)以及2011年1月至2013年4月通过DAA进行初次THA的所有患者(n = 399),对所有伤口并发症和所有感染进行了至少2年的随访。

结果

PA组的796例患者中,有6例伤口并发症导致再次手术,6例感染;4例为早期感染,2例为延迟感染。在感染病例中,1例为肥胖患者(体重指数[BMI] > 30 kg/m²)。2例手术为教学手术。DAA组的399例患者中,有3例切口裂开导致再次手术,其中2例为肥胖患者。还发现6例感染;4例为早期感染,2例为延迟感染。在感染病例中,3例为肥胖患者。4例手术为教学手术。

结论

在我们这组接受THA的患者中,与PA相比,DAA并未增加导致再次手术的伤口并发症发生率,也未增加早期或延迟感染的发生率。

相似文献

1
Are there more wound complications or infections with direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty?直接前路全髋关节置换术的伤口并发症或感染会更多吗?
Hip Int. 2018 Nov;28(6):591-598. doi: 10.1177/1120700018759617. Epub 2018 May 9.
2
Comparison of Wound Complications and Deep Infections With Direct Anterior and Posterior Approaches in Obese Hip Arthroplasty Patients.肥胖患者髋关节置换术中外侧入路与后侧入路的伤口并发症和深部感染比较。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Jan;33(1):220-223. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2017.07.047. Epub 2017 Aug 4.
3
Is Direct Anterior Approach a Credible Option for Severely Obese Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty? A Matched-Control, Retrospective, Clinical Study.直接前方入路在严重肥胖患者全髋关节置换术中是否可行?一项匹配对照、回顾性、临床研究。
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Aug;33(8):2535-2540. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.03.071. Epub 2018 Apr 11.
4
Severely Obese Patients Have a Higher Risk of Infection After Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty.严重肥胖患者在直接前路全髋关节置换术后感染风险更高。
J Arthroplasty. 2016 Sep;31(9 Suppl):162-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.03.037. Epub 2016 Mar 26.
5
A comparison between the direct anterior and posterior approaches for total hip arthroplasty: the role of an 'Enhanced Recovery' pathway.全髋关节置换术直接前路与后路手术的比较:“加速康复”方案的作用
Bone Joint J. 2016 Jun;98-B(6):754-60. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.98B6.36608.
6
The Role of Total Hip Arthroplasty Through the Direct Anterior Approach in Femoral Neck Fracture and Factors Affecting the Outcome.直接前入路全髋关节置换术在股骨颈骨折中的作用及影响疗效的因素。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jan;34(1):82-87. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.08.037. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
7
Outcome of Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty Complicated by Superficial Wound Dehiscence Requiring Irrigation and Debridement.直接前路髋关节置换术后发生切口浅表裂开需冲洗清创的结果。
J Arthroplasty. 2019 Jul;34(7):1492-1497. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2019.03.020. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
8
Incidence of perioperative events in single setting bilateral direct anterior approach total hip arthroplasty.单组双侧直接前路全髋关节置换术围手术期事件的发生率
J Arthroplasty. 2015 Mar;30(3):465-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.09.021. Epub 2014 Oct 2.
9
Increased Complications in Obese Patients Undergoing Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty.肥胖患者行直接前路全髋关节置换术时并发症增加。
J Arthroplasty. 2015 Aug;30(8):1384-7. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2015.03.002. Epub 2015 Mar 17.
10
Intraoperative Complications and Early Return to the Operating Room in Total Hip Arthroplasty Performed Through the Direct Anterior and Posterior Approaches. An Institutional Experience of Surgeons After Their Learning Curve.全髋关节置换术中经直接前路和后路入路的术中并发症及早期重返手术室情况。外科医生度过学习曲线后的机构经验。
J Arthroplasty. 2021 Aug;36(8):2829-2835. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.03.046. Epub 2021 Mar 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Direct anterior approach versus posterior approach in total hip arthroplasty after ONFH with failed vascularized iliac crest bone grafting for hip preservation: a retrospective comparative study.股骨头缺血性坏死(ONFH)行带血管蒂髂骨移植保髋失败后全髋关节置换术中直接前路与后路手术的比较:一项回顾性对照研究
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2025 Jul 15;26(1):686. doi: 10.1186/s12891-025-08418-0.
2
The impact of surgical approach in total hip arthroplasty on the organisms profile of periprosthetic joint infections? A systematic review and meta-analysis.全髋关节置换术中手术入路对假体周围关节感染微生物谱的影响?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2025 May 15;145(1):293. doi: 10.1007/s00402-025-05881-1.
3
Tri-Lock Bone Preservation Stem Versus Conventional Corail Stem in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty via Direct Anterior Approach: A Short-Term, Retrospective, Comparative Study.
Tri-Lock 骨保存柄与传统 Corail 柄在直接前入路初次全髋关节置换术中的应用:一项短期、回顾性、对照研究。
Med Sci Monit. 2023 Apr 17;29:e939635. doi: 10.12659/MSM.939635.
4
Approaches for Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review.全髋关节置换术的方法:一项系统评价。
Cureus. 2023 Feb 10;15(2):e34829. doi: 10.7759/cureus.34829. eCollection 2023 Feb.
5
Accuracy and Precision of Acetabular Component Position Does Not Differ Between the Anterior and Posterior Approaches to Total Hip Arthroplasty With Robotic Assistance: A Matched-Pair Analysis.机器人辅助全髋关节置换术中髋臼假体位置的准确性和精确性在前后入路之间无差异:配对分析
Arthroplast Today. 2022 Oct 18;18:68-75. doi: 10.1016/j.artd.2022.08.004. eCollection 2022 Dec.
6
The direct anterior approach for simultaneous bilateral total hip arthroplasty: a short-term efficacy analysis.同期双侧全髋关节置换术的直接前路手术:短期疗效分析
Arthroplasty. 2020 Jul 29;2(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s42836-020-00040-w.
7
Total hip arthroplasty through the direct anterior approach in morbidly obese patients.肥胖患者全髋关节置换术的直接前路手术
Bone Jt Open. 2022 Jan;3(1):4-11. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.31.BJO-2021-0166.R1.
8
Periprosthetic joint infection rates across primary total hip arthroplasty surgical approaches: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 653,633 procedures.全髋关节置换术不同手术入路的假体周围关节感染率:653633 例手术的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2022 Oct;142(10):2965-2977. doi: 10.1007/s00402-021-04186-3. Epub 2021 Sep 30.
9
Comparison of intra and post-operative complication rates among surgical approaches in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.全髋关节置换术中不同手术入路的术中和术后并发症发生率比较:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
J Orthop. 2020 May 19;20:310-325. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.05.008. eCollection 2020 Jul-Aug.