• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成员期望的分布如何影响群体中的合作与竞争:对社会困境的社会关系模型分析。

How the Distribution of Member Expectations Influences Cooperation and Competition in Groups: A Social Relations Model Analysis of Social Dilemmas.

机构信息

1 North Dakota State University, Fargo, USA.

出版信息

Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2018 Oct;44(10):1502-1518. doi: 10.1177/0146167218771322. Epub 2018 May 9.

DOI:10.1177/0146167218771322
PMID:29742995
Abstract

Group outcomes are difficult to model and predict using individual-level metrics. We use shared cognition concepts and the social relations model to predict cooperative group outcomes in two social dilemmas to test whether social projection or consensus among group members would best predict cooperation. Group-level variance components derived from the social relations model were used as indices of social projection and consensus. Groups played five rounds of two social dilemmas and predicted their partners' behavior on the following round. Results demonstrate that participants expect other group members to respond to the situation like the participant will and that shared expectations predict less competitive group behavior, but only when group members' expectations have little to no variance. This article demonstrates the utility of the social relations model in predicting group-level outcomes from individual inputs, as well as providing novel findings regarding the complex effects of shared expectations on collective outcomes.

摘要

使用个体水平的指标很难对群体结果进行建模和预测。我们使用共享认知概念和社会关系模型来预测两种社会困境中的合作群体结果,以测试成员之间的社会投射或共识是否能最好地预测合作。从社会关系模型中得出的群体水平方差分量被用作社会投射和共识的指标。群体进行了五轮两种社会困境的游戏,并预测了他们在下一轮的合作伙伴的行为。结果表明,参与者期望其他小组成员像参与者一样对情况做出反应,并且共享的期望预测了竞争较少的群体行为,但只有当小组成员的期望没有或几乎没有变化时才会如此。本文展示了社会关系模型在从个体输入预测群体结果方面的实用性,以及关于共享期望对集体结果的复杂影响的新发现。

相似文献

1
How the Distribution of Member Expectations Influences Cooperation and Competition in Groups: A Social Relations Model Analysis of Social Dilemmas.成员期望的分布如何影响群体中的合作与竞争:对社会困境的社会关系模型分析。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2018 Oct;44(10):1502-1518. doi: 10.1177/0146167218771322. Epub 2018 May 9.
2
Collective behavior.集体行为
Top Cogn Sci. 2009 Jul;1(3):412-38. doi: 10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01038.x.
3
Hidden profiles and concealed information: strategic information sharing and use in group decision making.隐藏的概况与隐蔽的信息:群体决策中的战略信息共享与运用
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2009 Jun;35(6):793-806. doi: 10.1177/0146167209333176. Epub 2009 Mar 30.
4
Characteristics of affected third parties and cooperative behavior in social dilemmas.社会困境中受影响第三方的特征与合作行为
J Soc Psychol. 2016 Nov-Dec;156(6):565-580. doi: 10.1080/00224545.2016.1140116. Epub 2016 Jan 12.
5
Children's capacity to use cultural focal points in coordination problems.
Cognition. 2016 Apr;149:95-103. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.12.016. Epub 2016 Jan 27.
6
Sex differences in in-group cooperation vary dynamically with competitive conditions and outcomes.群体内合作中的性别差异会随着竞争条件和结果动态变化。
Evol Psychol. 2012 Mar 18;10(1):102-19. doi: 10.1177/147470491201000112.
7
Face structure predicts cooperation: men with wider faces are more generous to their in-group when out-group competition is salient.面部结构预示着合作:当群体间竞争凸显时,宽脸男性对其所属群体更为慷慨大方。
Psychol Sci. 2012 Jul 1;23(7):718-22. doi: 10.1177/0956797611435133. Epub 2012 May 23.
8
Oxytocin differentially modulates compromise and competitive approach but not withdrawal to antagonists from own vs. rivaling other groups.催产素对妥协和竞争性接近行为有不同的调节作用,但对来自自身与竞争其他群体的拮抗剂的退缩行为没有影响。
Brain Res. 2014 Sep 11;1580:172-9. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.09.013. Epub 2013 Sep 20.
9
Distinct neural patterns of social cognition for cooperation versus competition.合作与竞争中社会认知的不同神经模式。
Neuroimage. 2016 Aug 15;137:86-96. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.04.069. Epub 2016 May 7.
10
Anger and retribution after collective overuse: the role of blaming and environmental uncertainty in social dilemmas.集体过度使用后的愤怒和报复:责备和环境不确定性在社会困境中的作用。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2010 Jan;36(1):59-70. doi: 10.1177/0146167209352192.

引用本文的文献

1
Rapport in same and mixed neurotype groups of autistic and non-autistic adults.自闭症和非自闭症成年人的同神经类型组和混合神经类型组中的融洽关系。
Autism. 2025 Jul;29(7):1700-1710. doi: 10.1177/13623613251320444. Epub 2025 Feb 24.
2
The effect of positive inter-group contact on cooperation: the moderating role of individualism.积极的群体间接触对合作的影响:个人主义的调节作用。
Front Psychol. 2024 Mar 5;15:1323710. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1323710. eCollection 2024.
3
The Impact of Cooperative Behavior between Social Organizations during the COVID-19 Pandemic Outbreak in Shanghai: A Simulation Approach.
《COVID-19 疫情期间上海社会组织合作行为的影响:一种模拟方法》
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Jan 12;20(2):1409. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20021409.