IoPPN, King's College London, De Crespigny Park, London, SE5 8AF, UK.
MRC London Institute of Medical Sciences (LMS), Du Cane Road, London, W12 0NN, UK.
Mol Psychiatry. 2019 Jun;24(6):776-794. doi: 10.1038/s41380-018-0058-9. Epub 2018 May 9.
People with psychotic disorders show abnormalities in several organ systems in addition to the central nervous system (CNS); and this contributes to excess mortality. However, it is unclear how strong the evidence is for alterations in non-CNS systems at the onset of psychosis, how the alterations in non-CNS systems compare to those in the CNS, or how they relate to symptoms. Here, we consider these questions, and suggest potential models to account for findings. We conducted a systematic meta-review to summarize effect sizes for both CNS (focusing on brain structural, neurophysiological, and neurochemical parameters) and non-CNS dysfunction (focusing on immune, cardiometabolic, and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) systems) in first-episode psychosis (FEP). Relevant meta-analyses were identified in a systematic search of Pubmed and the methodological quality of these was assessed using the AMSTAR checklist (A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews). Case-control data were extracted from studies included in these meta-analyses. Random effects meta-analyses were re-run and effect size magnitudes for individual parameters were calculated, as were summary effect sizes for each CNS and non-CNS system. We also grouped studies to obtain overall effect sizes for non-CNS and CNS alterations. Robustness of data for non-CNS and CNS parameters was assessed using Rosenthal's fail-safe N. We next statistically compared summary effect size for overall CNSand overall non-CNS alterations, as well as for each organ system separately. We also examined how non-CNS alterations correlate CNS alterations, and with psychopathological symptoms. Case-control data were extracted for 165 studies comprising a total sample size of 13,440. For people with first episode psychosis compared with healthy controls, we observed alterations in immune parameters (summary effect size: g = 1.19), cardiometabolic parameters (g = 0.23); HPA parameters (g = 0.68); brain structure (g = 0.40); neurophysiology (g = 0.80); and neurochemistry (g = 0.43). Grouping non-CNS organ systems together provided an effect size for overall non-CNS alterations in patients compared with controls (g = 0.58), which was not significantly different from the overall CNS alterations effect size (g = 0.50). However, the summary effect size for immune alterations was significantly greater than that for brain structural (P < 0.001) and neurochemical alterations (P < 0.001), while the summary effect size for cardiometabolic alterations was significantly lower than neurochemical (P = 0.04), neurophysiological (P < 0.001), and brain structural alterations (P = 0.001). The summary effect size for HPA alterations was not significantly different from brain structural (P = 0.14), neurophysiological (P = 0.54), or neurochemical alterations (P = 0.22). These outcomes remained similar in antipsychotic naive sensitivity analyses. We found some, but limited and inconsistent, evidence that non-CNS alterations were associated with CNS changes and symptoms in first episode psychosis. Our findings indicate that there are robust alterations in non-CNS systems in psychosis, and that these are broadly similar in magnitude to a range of CNS alterations. We consider models that could account for these findings and discuss implications for future research and treatment.
患有精神病的人除了中枢神经系统 (CNS) 外,在多个器官系统中也表现出异常;这导致死亡率增加。然而,目前尚不清楚精神病发作时非 CNS 系统的改变证据有多强,非 CNS 系统的改变与 CNS 相比如何,以及它们与症状的关系如何。在这里,我们考虑了这些问题,并提出了一些潜在的模型来解释这些发现。我们进行了系统的荟萃分析,以总结首发精神病 (FEP) 中 CNS(重点是脑结构、神经生理学和神经化学参数)和非 CNS 功能障碍(重点是免疫、心脏代谢和下丘脑-垂体-肾上腺 (HPA) 系统)的效应大小。在系统搜索 Pubmed 中确定了相关的荟萃分析,并使用 AMSTAR 检查表(用于评估系统评价的测量工具)评估这些方法的质量。从这些荟萃分析中包括的研究中提取了病例对照数据。重新运行了随机效应荟萃分析,并计算了每个参数的效应大小,以及每个 CNS 和非 CNS 系统的汇总效应大小。我们还将研究分组,以获得非 CNS 和 CNS 改变的总体效应大小。使用 Rosenthal 的失效安全 N 评估非 CNS 和 CNS 参数数据的稳健性。接下来,我们统计比较了 CNS 和非 CNS 改变的总体汇总效应大小,以及每个器官系统的单独汇总效应大小。我们还研究了非 CNS 改变与 CNS 改变以及与精神病理症状的相关性。为 165 项研究提取了病例对照数据,总样本量为 13440 人。与健康对照组相比,患有首发精神病的人表现出免疫参数改变(汇总效应大小:g = 1.19)、心脏代谢参数改变(g = 0.23);HPA 参数改变(g = 0.68);脑结构改变(g = 0.40);神经生理学改变(g = 0.80);和神经化学改变(g = 0.43)。将非 CNS 器官系统分组在一起,为与对照组相比患者的非 CNS 总体改变提供了一个效应大小(g = 0.58),与 CNS 总体改变的效应大小(g = 0.50)没有显著差异。然而,免疫改变的汇总效应大小明显大于脑结构(P < 0.001)和神经化学改变(P < 0.001),而心脏代谢改变的汇总效应大小明显小于神经化学改变(P = 0.04)、神经生理学改变(P < 0.001)和脑结构改变(P = 0.001)。HPA 改变的汇总效应大小与脑结构(P = 0.14)、神经生理学(P = 0.54)或神经化学改变(P = 0.22)无显著差异。在抗精神病药物初治的敏感性分析中,这些结果仍然相似。我们发现了一些,但有限且不一致的证据表明,非 CNS 改变与首发精神病中的 CNS 改变和症状有关。我们的研究结果表明,精神病患者存在非 CNS 系统的明显改变,其幅度与一系列 CNS 改变大致相似。我们考虑了可以解释这些发现的模型,并讨论了对未来研究和治疗的影响。