Suppr超能文献

野生猕猴挑战了有意图的工具生产的起源。

Wild macaques challenge the origin of intentional tool production.

机构信息

Technological Primates Research Group, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Deutscher Platz 6, 04103 Leipzig, Germany.

Center for the Advanced Study of Human Paleobiology, George Washington University, Washington, DC 20052, USA.

出版信息

Sci Adv. 2023 Mar 10;9(10):eade8159. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ade8159.

Abstract

Intentionally produced sharp-edged stone flakes and flaked pieces are our primary evidence for the emergence of technology in our lineage. This evidence is used to decipher the earliest hominin behavior, cognition, and subsistence strategies. Here, we report on the largest lithic assemblage associated with a primate foraging behavior undertaken by long-tailed macaques (). This behavior results in a landscape-wide record of flaked stone material, almost indistinguishable from early hominin flaked pieces and flakes. It is now clear that the production of unintentional conchoidal sharp-edged flakes can result from tool-assisted foraging in nonhominin primates. Comparisons with Plio-Pleistocene lithic assemblages, dating from 3.3 to 1.56 million years ago, show that flakes produced by macaques fall within the technological range of artifacts made by early hominins. In the absence of behavioral observations, the assemblage produced by monkeys would likely be identified as anthropogenic in origin and interpreted as evidence of intentional tool production.

摘要

有意制作的锐边石片和剥落的石片是我们在人类世系中出现技术的主要证据。这些证据被用来解读最早的人类行为、认知和生存策略。在这里,我们报告了与长尾猕猴()觅食行为相关的最大石器组合。这种行为导致了一个广泛的片状石材料记录,几乎与早期人类剥落的碎片和石片无法区分。现在很明显,非人类灵长类动物在工具辅助觅食过程中产生的非故意的贝壳状锐边石片。与更新世到更新世的石器组合相比,这些石器组合的年代可追溯到 330 万至 156 万年前,表明猕猴产生的石片属于早期人类制造的工具的技术范围。如果没有行为观察,猴子产生的组合很可能被认为是人为起源,并被解释为有意制作工具的证据。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e98d/10005173/ebfae2fed588/sciadv.ade8159-f1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验