Arthritis and Arthroplasty Design Group, The Bone and Joint Center, Magee Womens Hospital of the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Bioengineering, and Clinical and Translational Science Institute, University of Pittsburgh; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Division of Oncology, Dow Division for Urologic Health Service Research, Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
J Arthroplasty. 2018 Sep;33(9):2759-2763. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2018.04.008. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
The Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement bundle was created to decrease total knee arthroplasty (TKA) cost. To help accomplish this, there is a focus on reducing TKA readmissions. However, there is a lack of national representative sample of all-payer hospital admissions to direct strategy, identify risk factors for readmission, and understand actual readmission cost.
We used the Nationwide Readmission Database to examine national readmission rates, predictors of readmission, and associated readmission costs for elective TKA procedures. We fit a multivariable logistic regression model to examine factors associated with readmission. Then, we determined mean readmission costs and calculated the readmission cost when distributed across the entire TKA population.
We identified 224,465 patients having TKA across all states participating in the Nationwide Readmission Database. The mean unadjusted 30-day TKA readmission rate was 4%. The greatest predictors of readmission were congestive heart failure (odds ratio [OR] 2.51, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.62-2.80), renal disease (OR 2.19, 95% CI 2.03-2.37), and length of stay greater than 4 days (OR 2.4, 95% CI 2.25-2.61). The overall median cost for each readmission was $6753 ± 175. Extrapolating the readmission cost for the entire TKA population resulted in the readmission cost being 2% of the overall 30-day procedure cost.
A major focus of the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement bundle is improving cost and quality by limiting readmission rates. TKA readmissions are low and comprise a small percentage of total TKA cost, suggesting that they may not be the optimal measure of quality care or a significant driver of overall cost.
综合关节置换护理包的创建是为了降低全膝关节置换术(TKA)的成本。为了实现这一目标,重点是减少 TKA 的再入院率。然而,缺乏全国范围内所有支付者的医院入院数据,无法直接指导策略制定、确定再入院的风险因素以及了解实际再入院成本。
我们使用全国再入院数据库来研究 TKA 择期手术的再入院率、再入院的预测因素和相关再入院费用。我们拟合了多变量逻辑回归模型来研究与再入院相关的因素。然后,我们确定了平均再入院费用,并计算了在整个 TKA 人群中分布的再入院费用。
我们在全国再入院数据库中确定了来自所有参与州的 224465 例 TKA 患者。未经调整的 30 天 TKA 再入院率的平均值为 4%。再入院的最大预测因素是充血性心力衰竭(优势比[OR]2.51,95%置信区间[CI]2.62-2.80)、肾脏疾病(OR 2.19,95%CI 2.03-2.37)和住院时间超过 4 天(OR 2.4,95%CI 2.25-2.61)。每次再入院的总体中位数费用为 6753 美元±175 美元。将整个 TKA 人群的再入院费用外推,结果表明再入院费用占整个 30 天手术费用的 2%。
综合关节置换护理包的主要重点是通过限制再入院率来提高成本效益。TKA 的再入院率较低,占 TKA 总费用的比例较小,这表明它们可能不是衡量优质护理的最佳指标,也不是总费用的主要驱动因素。