Suppr超能文献

Ⅲ型齿状突骨折:对采用外固定治疗的复杂高能骨折的亚组分析。

Type III odontoid fractures: A subgroup analysis of complex, high-energy fractures treated with external immobilization.

作者信息

Niemeier Thomas E, Dyas Adam R, Manoharan Sakthivel R, Theiss Steven M

机构信息

Division of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Alabama, USA.

出版信息

J Craniovertebr Junction Spine. 2018 Jan-Mar;9(1):63-67. doi: 10.4103/jcvjs.JCVJS_152_17.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

Type III odontoid fractures are classically treated nonoperatively, yet, the current literature on Type III odontoid fractures includes fractures of multiple etiologies and fracture morphologies. We hypothesize that a subgroup of complex, Type III fractures caused by high-energy mechanisms are more likely to fail nonoperative treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Acute Type III odontoid fractures were identified at a single institution from 2008 to 2015. Fractures were categorized as high- or low-energy fracture with high-energy fractures defined as those with lateral mass comminution (>50%) or secondary fracture lines into the pars interarticularis or vertebral body. Patients were treated in either a hard collar orthosis or halo vest and were followed for fracture union and stability.

RESULTS

One hundred and twenty-five Type III odontoid fractures were identified with 51% classified as complex fractures. Thirty-three patients met the inclusion and exclusion criteria including 15 patients treated in a halo vest and 18 in a hard collar orthosis. Mean follow-up was 32 (±44) weeks. Seven patients demonstrated progressive displacement of either 2 mm of translation or 5° of angulation and underwent delayed surgical stabilization. Two additional patients required delayed surgery for nonunion and myelopathy. Initial fracture displacement and angulation were not correlative with final outcome. No statistical advantage of halo vest versus hard collar orthosis was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Complex Type III odontoid fractures are distinctly different from low-energy injuries. In the current study, 21% of patients were unsuccessfully treated nonoperatively with external immobilization and required surgery. For complex Type III fractures, we recommend initial conservative treatment, while maintaining close monitoring throughout patient recovery and fracture union.

摘要

研究设计

回顾性队列研究。

目的

III型齿状突骨折传统上采用非手术治疗,然而,目前关于III型齿状突骨折的文献包括多种病因和骨折形态的骨折。我们假设,由高能量机制导致的复杂III型骨折亚组更有可能非手术治疗失败。

材料与方法

2008年至2015年在单一机构识别急性III型齿状突骨折。骨折分为高能量或低能量骨折,高能量骨折定义为伴有侧块粉碎(>50%)或继发骨折线累及关节突间部或椎体的骨折。患者采用硬颈托矫形器或头环背心治疗,并随访骨折愈合及稳定性情况。

结果

共识别出125例III型齿状突骨折,其中51%为复杂骨折。33例患者符合纳入和排除标准,包括15例采用头环背心治疗的患者和18例采用硬颈托矫形器治疗的患者。平均随访时间为32(±44)周。7例患者出现2mm平移或5°成角的渐进性移位,并接受了延迟手术固定。另外2例患者因骨折不愈合和脊髓病需要延迟手术。初始骨折移位和成角与最终结果无关。未观察到头环背心与硬颈托矫形器在统计学上的优势。

结论

复杂III型齿状突骨折与低能量损伤明显不同。在本研究中,21%的患者采用外固定非手术治疗失败,需要手术治疗。对于复杂III型骨折,我们建议初始采用保守治疗,同时在患者恢复和骨折愈合过程中密切监测。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验