• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童对医疗保健中人机交互的想象。

Children's Imaginaries of Human-Robot Interaction in Healthcare.

机构信息

Department of Social Psychology, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Barcelona, Spain.

Automatic Control Department, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, UPC BarcelonaTech, 08028 Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 May 12;15(5):970. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15050970.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph15050970
PMID:29757221
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5982009/
Abstract

This paper analyzes children’s imaginaries of Human-Robots Interaction (HRI) in the context of social robots in healthcare, and it explores ethical and social issues when designing a social robot for a children’s hospital. Based on approaches that emphasize the reciprocal relationship between society and technology, the analytical force of imaginaries lies in their capacity to be embedded in practices and interactions as well as to affect the construction and applications of surrounding technologies. The study is based on a participatory process carried out with six-year-old children for the design of a robot. Imaginaries of HRI are analyzed from a care-centered approach focusing on children’s values and practices as related to their representation of care. The conceptualization of HRI as an assemblage of interactions, the prospective bidirectional care relationships with robots, and the engagement with the robot as an entity of multiple potential robots are the major findings of this study. The study shows the potential of studying imaginaries of HRI, and it concludes that their integration in the final design of robots is a way of including ethical values in it.

摘要

本文分析了儿童在医疗保健领域中对人机交互(HRI)的想象,并探讨了在为儿童医院设计社交机器人时的伦理和社会问题。基于强调社会与技术之间相互关系的方法,想象的分析力在于它们能够嵌入实践和互动中,并影响周围技术的构建和应用。该研究基于与 6 岁儿童一起进行的参与式设计机器人的过程。从以关怀为中心的方法分析了 HRI 的想象,重点关注儿童的价值观和实践,以及他们对关怀的表现。将 HRI 概念化为互动的组合、与机器人的预期双向关怀关系,以及将机器人作为具有多种潜在机器人的实体进行参与,是本研究的主要发现。该研究表明了研究 HRI 想象的潜力,并得出结论,将其纳入机器人的最终设计是将伦理价值观纳入其中的一种方式。

相似文献

1
Children's Imaginaries of Human-Robot Interaction in Healthcare.儿童对医疗保健中人机交互的想象。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 May 12;15(5):970. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15050970.
2
Socially intelligent robots: dimensions of human-robot interaction.具备社交智能的机器人:人机交互的维度
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2007 Apr 29;362(1480):679-704. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2006.2004.
3
The Tactile Ethics of Soft Robotics: Designing Wisely for Human-Robot Interaction.软机器人的触觉伦理:为人机交互进行明智的设计。
Soft Robot. 2017 Jun;4(2):81-87. doi: 10.1089/soro.2017.0032. Epub 2017 May 19.
4
Imagine how to behave: the influence of imagined contact on human-robot interaction.试想一下行为方式:想象接触对人机交互的影响。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2019 Apr 29;374(1771):20180038. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0038.
5
From social brains to social robots: applying neurocognitive insights to human-robot interaction.从社会大脑到社交机器人:将神经认知见解应用于人机交互。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2019 Apr 29;374(1771):20180024. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2018.0024.
6
Human-Robot Interaction and Social Robot: The Emerging Field of Healthcare Robotics and Current and Future Perspectives for Spinal Care.人机交互与社交机器人:医疗机器人的新兴领域以及脊柱护理的现状与未来展望。
Neurospine. 2024 Sep;21(3):868-877. doi: 10.14245/ns.2448432.216. Epub 2024 Sep 30.
7
Ethical considerations in child-robot interactions.儿童与机器人互动中的伦理问题。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2023 Aug;151:105230. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105230. Epub 2023 May 9.
8
Relationship Development with Humanoid Social Robots: Applying Interpersonal Theories to Human-Robot Interaction.人形社交机器人的关系发展:将人际关系理论应用于人机交互。
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2021 May;24(5):294-299. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2020.0181. Epub 2021 Jan 11.
9
Maximizing the Benefits of Participatory Design for Human-Robot Interaction Research With Older Adults.最大限度地提高参与式设计在老年人人机交互研究中的益处。
Hum Factors. 2022 May;64(3):441-450. doi: 10.1177/00187208211037465. Epub 2021 Aug 30.
10
Promoting Interactions Between Humans and Robots Using Robotic Emotional Behavior.利用机器人情感行为促进人机交互。
IEEE Trans Cybern. 2016 Dec;46(12):2911-2923. doi: 10.1109/TCYB.2015.2492999. Epub 2015 Nov 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Towards a conceptualisation and critique of everyday life in HRI.迈向对人机交互中日常生活的概念化与批判。
Front Robot AI. 2023 Sep 14;10:1212034. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2023.1212034. eCollection 2023.
2
Do different robot appearances change emotion recognition in children with ASD?不同的机器人外观会改变自闭症谱系障碍儿童的情绪识别能力吗?
Front Neurorobot. 2023 Mar 2;17:1044491. doi: 10.3389/fnbot.2023.1044491. eCollection 2023.
3
Playful strategies to foster the well-being of pediatric cancer patients in the Brazilian Unified Health System: a design thinking approach.

本文引用的文献

1
PARTICIPATORY DESIGN OF PEDIATRIC UPPER LIMB PROSTHESES: QUALITATIVE METHODS AND PROTOTYPING.参与式设计的儿科上肢假肢:定性方法和原型制作。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2017 Jan;33(6):629-637. doi: 10.1017/S0266462317000836. Epub 2017 Sep 6.
2
Towards an empirical ethics in care: relations with technologies in health care.走向护理中的实证伦理学:与医疗保健技术的关系。
Med Health Care Philos. 2015 Feb;18(1):81-90. doi: 10.1007/s11019-014-9582-9.
3
Care networking: a study of technical mediations in a home telecare service.
采用游戏策略促进巴西统一卫生系统中儿科癌症患者的健康:设计思维方法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2021 Sep 18;21(1):985. doi: 10.1186/s12913-021-07018-7.
4
Role-Play as Responsible Robotics: The Virtual Witness Testimony Role-Play Interview for Investigating Hazardous Human-Robot Interactions.模拟负责的机器人角色:用于调查危险人机交互的虚拟证人证言角色扮演访谈。
Front Robot AI. 2021 Jun 29;8:644336. doi: 10.3389/frobt.2021.644336. eCollection 2021.
5
Are friends electric? The benefits and risks of human-robot relationships.朋友是带电的吗?人机关系的益处与风险。
iScience. 2020 Dec 26;24(1):101993. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101993. eCollection 2021 Jan 22.
关怀联网:家庭远程医疗服务中的技术调解研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2013 Jul 22;10(7):3072-88. doi: 10.3390/ijerph10073072.
4
Social robots for health applications.用于健康应用的社交机器人。
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011;2011:5368-71. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6091328.
5
Designing robots for care: care centered value-sensitive design.为关怀而设计机器人:关怀为中心的价值敏感设计。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2013 Jun;19(2):407-33. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9343-6. Epub 2012 Jan 3.
6
A meta-analysis of factors affecting trust in human-robot interaction.元分析影响人机交互信任的因素。
Hum Factors. 2011 Oct;53(5):517-27. doi: 10.1177/0018720811417254.
7
Socialization between toddlers and robots at an early childhood education center.幼儿教育中心里幼儿与机器人之间的社交互动。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Nov 13;104(46):17954-8. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0707769104. Epub 2007 Nov 5.
8
Participatory design in health sciences: Using cooperative experimental methods in developing health services and computer technology.健康科学中的参与式设计:在健康服务和计算机技术开发中运用合作实验方法。
Qual Health Res. 2007 Jan;17(1):122-30. doi: 10.1177/1049732306293664.
9
The care perspective and autonomy.关怀视角与自主性。
Med Health Care Philos. 2001;4(3):289-94. doi: 10.1023/a:1012048907443.