Líndal E, Udén A
Department of Psychiatry, National University Hospital, Reykjavík, Iceland.
Percept Mot Skills. 1988 Dec;67(3):835-45. doi: 10.2466/pms.1988.67.3.835.
Two groups of subjects with back pain were studied (n = 67). All subjects underwent a battery of psychological tests which included a test of psychological differentiation (the Rod-and-Frame Test), a test of psychological defenses (Meta-contrast Technique), and the Eysenck Personality Inventory. In addition, the subjects drew a pain picture and answered a questionnaire on pain-related issues. Each group of subjects was then subdivided into 4 groups depending on the judged abnormality of their pain drawings. The two main groups were compared overall and the subgroups of the two back-pain groups compared with each other. The Meta-contrast Technique results show that depression was quite common among back-pain subjects as a whole compared to a painless group of subjects. Differences were found on field-dependence; subjects with abnormal pain drawings were more field-dependent than those with "normal" pain drawings. Few other between-group statistical differences were noted between the two back-pain groups. Expected scores on hysteria were not noted among the abnormal drawing makers, neither were there differences between the groups on the items of pain duration, physical functionings, or of depression.
对两组背痛患者进行了研究(n = 67)。所有受试者都接受了一系列心理测试,包括心理分化测试(棒框测试)、心理防御测试(元对比技术)以及艾森克人格问卷。此外,受试者绘制了一幅疼痛图,并回答了一份关于疼痛相关问题的问卷。然后,根据对其疼痛图判断的异常情况,将每组受试者再细分为4组。对两个主要组进行整体比较,并将两个背痛组的亚组相互比较。元对比技术结果显示,与无痛受试者组相比,背痛受试者总体上抑郁相当常见。在场依存性方面发现了差异;疼痛图异常的受试者比疼痛图“正常”的受试者更具场依存性。在两个背痛组之间几乎没有注意到其他组间统计差异。在绘制异常图的受试者中未发现癔症的预期得分,在疼痛持续时间、身体功能或抑郁项目上两组之间也没有差异。