Rydén O, Lindal E, Udén A, Hansson S B
Scand J Rehabil Med. 1985;17(4):155-61.
A specially designed pain questionnaire was administered to 52 consecutive out-patients referred to an orthopaedic clinic of a general hospital over a two week period because of pain in the lower back. A clinical evaluation, based on the patients' markings on 'pain drawings', and on the degree of compatibility between their reported pain symptoms and the results of physical examinations, led to the classification of 21 cases (40%) as psychogenic. The answers of these patients to the questionnaire differed in several aspects from those of the remaining 60%. Pain was more severe, multiform and enduring, and had a more pervasive influence on their life situation; they included a higher frequency of family problems, changes of employment, stress experienced at work, sleeping problems, and 'specialist shopping'. Without being aware of which patients were classified as psychogenic cases, the orthopaedic surgeons made less auspicious prognoses for these patients and also found the questionnaire more helpful in evaluating them. When asked to rate the intensity of the patients' pain, the surgeons, unlike the patients, avoided extreme ratings. Comparing the two scales used (a six-step verbal scale and a 10 cm graphic rating scale (GRS) for rating pain intensity, patients found the GRS to be more meaningful. The words occupied different relative positions on the verbal scale and the GRS, and their position on the GRS fluctuated according to whether they denoted general pain or pain during attacks. The findings suggest that the questionnaire is a useful screening tool for identifying patients requiring further psychological evaluation.
在两周时间内,一份专门设计的疼痛问卷被发放给了52名因下背部疼痛而被转诊至一家综合医院骨科门诊的连续门诊患者。基于患者在“疼痛图”上的标注以及他们所报告的疼痛症状与体格检查结果之间的相符程度进行的临床评估,使得21例(40%)患者被归类为心因性疼痛。这些患者对问卷的回答在几个方面与其余60%的患者不同。他们的疼痛更严重、形式多样且持续时间更长,对其生活状况的影响更为普遍;其中家庭问题、工作变动、工作压力、睡眠问题以及“专科就诊”的频率更高。在不知道哪些患者被归类为心因性病例的情况下,骨科医生对这些患者的预后判断不太乐观,并且也发现问卷在评估他们时更有帮助。当被要求对患者的疼痛强度进行评分时,与患者不同,医生避免给出极端评分。比较所使用的两种量表(一种六步言语量表和一种用于评定疼痛强度的10厘米视觉模拟评分量表(GRS)),患者发现GRS更有意义。这些词语在言语量表和GRS上占据不同的相对位置,并且它们在GRS上的位置会根据其表示的是一般疼痛还是发作时的疼痛而波动。研究结果表明,该问卷是识别需要进一步心理评估患者的有用筛查工具。