• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于显微镜筛选中细胞阵列与多孔板的比较

Comparison of Cell Arrays and Multi-Well Plates in Microscopy-Based Screening.

作者信息

Becker Ann-Kristin, Erfle Holger, Gunkel Manuel, Beil Nina, Kaderali Lars, Starkuviene Vytaute

机构信息

Institute of Bioinformatics, University Medicine Greifswald, 17475 Greifswald, Germany.

BioQuant, Heidelberg University, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

High Throughput. 2018 May 15;7(2):13. doi: 10.3390/ht7020013.

DOI:10.3390/ht7020013
PMID:29762489
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6023461/
Abstract

Multi-well plates and cell arrays enable microscopy-based screening assays in which many samples can be analysed in parallel. Each of the formats possesses its own strengths and weaknesses, but reference comparisons between these platforms and their application rationale is lacking. We aim to fill this gap by comparing two RNA interference (RNAi)-mediated fluorescence microscopy-based assays, namely epidermal growth factor (EGF) internalization and cell cycle progression, on both platforms. Quantitative analysis revealed that both platforms enabled the generation of data with the appearance of the expected phenotypes significantly distinct from the negative controls. The measurements of cell cycle progression were less variable in multi-well plates. The result can largely be attributed to higher cell numbers resulting in less data variability when dealing with the assay generating phenotypic cell subpopulations. The EGF internalization assay with a uniform phenotype over nearly the whole cell population performed better on cell arrays than in multi-well plates. The result was achieved by scoring five times less cells on cell arrays than in multi-well plates, indicating the efficiency of the cell array format. Our data indicate that the choice of the screening platform primarily depends on the type of the cellular assay to achieve a maximum data quality and screen efficiency.

摘要

多孔板和细胞阵列可实现基于显微镜的筛选分析,能够同时对多个样本进行分析。每种形式都有其自身的优缺点,但这些平台之间的参考比较及其应用原理尚付阙如。我们旨在通过在这两种平台上比较两种基于RNA干扰(RNAi)介导的荧光显微镜分析方法,即表皮生长因子(EGF)内化和细胞周期进程,来填补这一空白。定量分析表明,两种平台都能够生成数据,且预期表型的出现与阴性对照有显著差异。在多孔板中,细胞周期进程的测量结果变异性较小。这一结果很大程度上归因于细胞数量较多,在处理产生表型细胞亚群的分析时,数据变异性较小。在细胞阵列上,几乎整个细胞群体具有统一表型的EGF内化分析比在多孔板中表现更好。在细胞阵列上评分的细胞数量比在多孔板中少五倍,从而获得了这一结果,表明了细胞阵列形式的效率。我们的数据表明,筛选平台的选择主要取决于细胞分析的类型,以实现最大的数据质量和筛选效率。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4f0/6023461/68b1d8989178/high-throughput-07-00013-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4f0/6023461/2c9d0b108479/high-throughput-07-00013-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4f0/6023461/ca68e91d2d88/high-throughput-07-00013-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4f0/6023461/4a47d5686ffd/high-throughput-07-00013-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4f0/6023461/65c5e01919f3/high-throughput-07-00013-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4f0/6023461/85e584dcd86a/high-throughput-07-00013-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4f0/6023461/b88df9910203/high-throughput-07-00013-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4f0/6023461/68b1d8989178/high-throughput-07-00013-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4f0/6023461/2c9d0b108479/high-throughput-07-00013-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4f0/6023461/ca68e91d2d88/high-throughput-07-00013-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4f0/6023461/4a47d5686ffd/high-throughput-07-00013-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4f0/6023461/65c5e01919f3/high-throughput-07-00013-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4f0/6023461/85e584dcd86a/high-throughput-07-00013-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4f0/6023461/b88df9910203/high-throughput-07-00013-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d4f0/6023461/68b1d8989178/high-throughput-07-00013-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Comparison of Cell Arrays and Multi-Well Plates in Microscopy-Based Screening.基于显微镜筛选中细胞阵列与多孔板的比较
High Throughput. 2018 May 15;7(2):13. doi: 10.3390/ht7020013.
2
Work flow for multiplexing siRNA assays by solid-phase reverse transfection in multiwell plates.在多孔板中通过固相反向转染进行多重siRNA检测的工作流程。
J Biomol Screen. 2008 Aug;13(7):575-80. doi: 10.1177/1087057108320133. Epub 2008 Jul 3.
3
Large-scale screening assay to measure epidermal growth factor internalization.用于测量表皮生长因子内化的大规模筛选试验。
J Biomol Screen. 2000 Jun;5(3):133-40. doi: 10.1177/108705710000500305.
4
Fluorescence microscopy-based RNA interference screening.基于荧光显微镜的RNA干扰筛选。
Methods Mol Biol. 2015;1251:59-66. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-2080-8_4.
5
A fluorescence digital image microscopy system for quantifying relative cell numbers in tissue culture plates.一种用于定量组织培养板中相对细胞数量的荧光数字图像显微镜系统。
Cytometry. 1996 Jul 1;24(3):204-13. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0320(19960701)24:3<204::AID-CYTO3>3.0.CO;2-H.
6
A multi-modality assay platform for ultra-high throughput screening.一种用于超高通量筛选的多模态检测平台。
Curr Pharm Biotechnol. 2000 Nov;1(3):265-81. doi: 10.2174/1389201003378933.
7
Cell arrays and high-content screening.细胞阵列与高内涵筛选。
Methods Mol Biol. 2011;785:277-87. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-286-1_19.
8
Solution ELISA as a platform of choice for development of robust, drug tolerant immunogenicity assays in support of drug development.解决方案 ELISA 作为一个平台,选择开发稳健、耐药性免疫原性检测方法,以支持药物开发。
J Immunol Methods. 2011 Feb 28;365(1-2):38-49. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2010.11.011. Epub 2010 Dec 1.
9
Application of Imaging-Based Assays in Microplate Formats for High-Content Screening.基于成像的检测方法在微孔板形式的高内涵筛选中的应用。
Methods Mol Biol. 2016;1439:273-304. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4939-3673-1_18.
10
Identification of anti-tumour biologics using primary tumour models, 3-D phenotypic screening and image-based multi-parametric profiling.利用原发性肿瘤模型、三维表型筛选和基于图像的多参数分析鉴定抗肿瘤生物制剂。
Mol Cancer. 2015 Jul 31;14:147. doi: 10.1186/s12943-015-0415-0.

本文引用的文献

1
Droplet Microarrays: From Surface Patterning to High-Throughput Applications.液滴微流控技术:从表面图案化到高通量应用。
Adv Mater. 2018 May;30(20):e1706111. doi: 10.1002/adma.201706111. Epub 2018 Mar 23.
2
A CRISPR Resource for Individual, Combinatorial, or Multiplexed Gene Knockout.一种用于单个、组合或多重基因敲除的CRISPR资源。
Mol Cell. 2017 Jul 20;67(2):348-354.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.molcel.2017.06.030.
3
Playing polo during mitosis: PLK1 takes the lead.有丝分裂期间打马球:PLK1 起带头作用。
Oncogene. 2017 Aug 24;36(34):4819-4827. doi: 10.1038/onc.2017.113. Epub 2017 Apr 24.
4
Miniaturized platform for high-throughput screening of stem cells.用于干细胞高通量筛选的小型化平台。
Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2017 Aug;46:141-149. doi: 10.1016/j.copbio.2017.03.005. Epub 2017 Apr 4.
5
An engineered minimal chromosomal passenger complex reveals a role for INCENP/Sli15 spindle association in chromosome biorientation.一种经过改造的最小染色体乘客复合体揭示了INCENP/Sli15纺锤体关联在染色体双定向中的作用。
J Cell Biol. 2017 Apr 3;216(4):911-923. doi: 10.1083/jcb.201609123. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
6
Large tumor suppressors 1 and 2 regulate Aurora-B through phosphorylation of INCENP to ensure completion of cytokinesis.大肿瘤抑制因子 1 和 2 通过磷酸化 INCENP 来调节 Aurora-B,以确保胞质分裂的完成。
Heliyon. 2016 Jul 20;2(7):e00131. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2016.e00131. eCollection 2016 Jul.
7
A small molecule identified through an in silico screen inhibits Aurora B-INCENP interaction.通过计算机筛选鉴定出的一种小分子可抑制极光激酶B与染色体乘客复合体亚基(INCENP)的相互作用。
Chem Biol Drug Des. 2016 Dec;88(6):783-794. doi: 10.1111/cbdd.12816. Epub 2016 Aug 20.
8
KNIME for Open-Source Bioimage Analysis: A Tutorial.用于开源生物图像分析的KNIME:教程
Adv Anat Embryol Cell Biol. 2016;219:179-97. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-28549-8_7.
9
Parallel shRNA and CRISPR-Cas9 screens enable antiviral drug target identification.平行的短发夹RNA(shRNA)和CRISPR-Cas9筛选可用于鉴定抗病毒药物靶点。
Nat Chem Biol. 2016 May;12(5):361-6. doi: 10.1038/nchembio.2050. Epub 2016 Mar 28.
10
Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (3rd edition).自噬监测检测方法的使用与解读指南(第3版)
Autophagy. 2016;12(1):1-222. doi: 10.1080/15548627.2015.1100356.