Suppr超能文献

思维漫游与任务聚焦注意:ERP 相关物。

Mind Wandering and Task-Focused Attention: ERP Correlates.

机构信息

Psychological Neuroscience Laboratory- CIPsi, School of Psychology, University of Minho, Braga, Portugal.

Spaulding Neuromodulation Center, Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Massachusetts General Hospital. Harvard Medical School, Boston, USA.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2018 May 15;8(1):7608. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-26028-w.

Abstract

Previous studies looking at how Mind Wandering (MW) impacts performance in distinct Focused Attention (FA) systems, using the Attention Network Task (ANT), showed that the presence of pure MW thoughts did not impact the overall performance of ANT (alert, orienting and conflict) performance. However, it still remains unclear if the lack of interference of MW in the ANT, reported at the behavioral level, has a neurophysiological correspondence. We hypothesize that a distinct cortical processing may be required to meet attentional demands during MW. The objective of the present study was to test if, given similar levels of ANT performance, individuals predominantly focusing on MW or FA show distinct cortical processing. Thirty-three healthy participants underwent an EEG high-density acquisition while they were performing the ANT. MW was assessed following the ANT using an adapted version of the Resting State Questionnaire (ReSQ). The following ERP's were analyzed: pN1, pP1, P1, N1, pN, and P3. At the behavioral level, participants were slower and less accurate when responding to incongruent than to congruent targets (conflict effect), benefiting from the presentation of the double (alerting effect) and spatial (orienting effect) cues. Consistent with the behavioral data, ERP's waves were discriminative of distinct attentional effects. However, these results remained true irrespective of the MW condition, suggesting that MW imposed no additional cortical demand in alert, orienting, and conflict attention tasks.

摘要

先前的研究着眼于心流(MW)如何影响注意力网络任务(ANT)中不同专注注意力(FA)系统的表现,结果表明,纯粹的 MW 思维的存在并不影响 ANT(警觉、定向和冲突)性能的整体表现。然而,目前仍不清楚在行为层面报告的 MW 对 ANT 缺乏干扰是否具有神经生理学对应关系。我们假设,MW 期间需要特定的皮质处理来满足注意力需求。本研究的目的是测试在 ANT 表现相似的情况下,主要关注 MW 或 FA 的个体是否表现出不同的皮质处理。33 名健康参与者在进行 ANT 时接受了高密度 EEG 采集。ANT 后使用改编版的静息状态问卷(ReSQ)评估 MW。分析了以下 ERP:pN1、pP1、P1、N1、pN 和 P3。在行为层面,参与者对不一致的目标的反应比对一致的目标慢且准确性低(冲突效应),受益于双重呈现(警觉效应)和空间(定向效应)提示。与行为数据一致,ERP 波可区分不同的注意力效应。然而,这些结果仍然是真实的,无论 MW 条件如何,这表明 MW 没有在警觉、定向和冲突注意力任务中施加额外的皮质需求。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f5e4/5953943/804a76df85fb/41598_2018_26028_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验