Concha Sandoval Juan Manuel, Osma Rueda José Luis, Sandoval Daza Alejandro
Departamento de Ciencias Quirúrgicas Facultad de Salud, Universidad del Cauca, Colombia.
Departamento de Cirugía Facultad de Salud, Universidad Industrial de Santander, Colombia.
Trauma Surg Acute Care Open. 2017 Mar 18;2(1):e000029. doi: 10.1136/tsaco-2016-000029. eCollection 2017.
Fixation of diaphyseal tibial fractures by plates is not considered the best option due to complications that may eventually arise; however, if principles of stability and proper surgical techniques are used, it is possible to obtain fracture consolidation without major risks.
We conducted a cross-sectional observational descriptive study by retrospectively analyzing medical records of patients with diaphyseal tibial fractures that were treated with plates from the period between June 2011 and June 2014 at San José and Susana López Hospitals in the city of Popayan, Colombia. 3 treatment groups were created and analyzed according to the type of fracture (Association Osteosynthesis/Osteosynthesis Trauma Association AO/OTA): group I: simple fractures 42A/B, absolute stability; group II: simple fractures 42A/B, Minimally Invasive Plate Osteosynthesis (MIPO) technique, relative stability; group III: multifragmentary fractures 42C, MIPO technique, relative stability. A descriptive analysis of patients, fracture consolidation time, and complications in each group were performed.
45 patients with tibial fractures treated with osteosynthesis plates were analyzed. Group I: 14 patients, 42A (n=13) and 42B (n=1), had an average consolidation time of 16.38 (SD=1.98) and 14 weeks, respectively. In group II: 19 patients, out of which 18 achieved fracture consolidation (42A n=15 and 42B n=3) with an average time of 17.4 (SD=3.33) and 17.3 weeks (SD=6.11), respectively. Finally, in group III: 12 patients all with 42C fractures with a consolidation time of 16.86 (SD=2.93) weeks. The average fracture consolidation time for all 44 patients was 16.86 weeks (SD 2.93).
Osteosynthesis plates are an alternative to intramedullary nailing for diaphyseal tibial fractures and their outcomes can be favorable as long as the management of soft tissues and the proper principle of stability are taken into account.
IV.
由于可能最终出现的并发症,采用钢板固定胫骨干骨折不被视为最佳选择;然而,如果运用稳定性原则和恰当的手术技术,有可能在无重大风险的情况下实现骨折愈合。
我们进行了一项横断面观察性描述性研究,回顾性分析了2011年6月至2014年6月期间在哥伦比亚波帕扬市圣何塞医院和苏珊娜·洛佩斯医院接受钢板治疗的胫骨干骨折患者的病历。根据骨折类型(接骨术协会/创伤接骨术协会AO/OTA)创建并分析了3个治疗组:第一组:简单骨折42A/B,绝对稳定性;第二组:简单骨折42A/B,微创钢板接骨术(MIPO)技术,相对稳定性;第三组:多段骨折42C,MIPO技术,相对稳定性。对每组患者、骨折愈合时间和并发症进行了描述性分析。
分析了45例接受接骨钢板治疗的胫骨骨折患者。第一组:14例患者,42A(n = 13)和42B(n = 1),平均愈合时间分别为16.38(标准差 = 1.98)周和14周。第二组:19例患者,其中18例实现骨折愈合(42A,n = 15;42B,n = 3),平均时间分别为17.4(标准差 = 3.33)周和17.3(标准差 = 6.11)周。最后,第三组:12例患者均为42C骨折,愈合时间为16.86(标准差 = 2.93)周。所有44例患者的平均骨折愈合时间为16.86周(标准差2.93)。
对于胫骨干骨折,接骨钢板是髓内钉固定的一种替代方法,只要考虑软组织处理和恰当的稳定性原则,其结果可能是良好的。
四级。