Suppr超能文献

长期透析患者内镜逆行胰胆管造影术治疗胆总管结石的安全性和疗效:倾向评分分析。

Safety and Efficacy of Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography for Choledocholithiasis in Long-Term Dialysis: A Propensity Score Analysis.

机构信息

Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yeungnam University College of Medicine, 170 Hyeonchung-ro, Nam-gu, Daegu, 42415, Republic of Korea.

出版信息

Dig Dis Sci. 2018 Nov;63(11):3141-3146. doi: 10.1007/s10620-018-5112-6. Epub 2018 May 16.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Previous studies evaluating the safety of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) undergoing hemodialysis reported an increased risk of post-procedural bleeding. We investigated the safety and efficacy of ERCP for the treatment of choledocholithiasis in patients with ESRD undergoing long-term dialysis.

METHODS

A total of 3466 patients who underwent ERCP due to choledocholithiasis between January 2000 and Feb 2018 were reviewed and analyzed retrospectively. Patients were divided into dialysis and non-dialysis group, and propensity score matching was used to minimize selection bias.

RESULTS

Patients of dialysis group (n = 39) and non-dialysis group (n = 78) were compared after propensity score matching. Among 39 patients of dialysis group, hemodialysis was used in 28 (71.8%) patients for renal replacement therapy, while 11 (28.2%) patients received peritoneal dialysis. The median duration of dialysis was 8 years (range 1-24 years). Overall success rate of ERCP was not different between two groups. The overall prevalence of post-procedural complications in dialysis group and non-dialysis group was 28.2 and 15.4%, respectively (p = 0.100). Post-procedural bleeding occurred more frequently in dialysis group than non-dialysis group (23.1 vs 5.1%, p = 0.004). All procedure-related bleeding episodes were successfully controlled using endoscopic management. Prevalence of post-ERCP pancreatitis, infection, and perforation were not significantly different between two groups (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall success rate of complete ductal clearance was not different between dialysis and non-dialysis groups. The risk of post-procedural bleeding seems to be increased in patients with ESRD undergoing long-term dialysis.

摘要

背景与目的

先前评估接受血液透析的终末期肾病(ESRD)患者行内镜逆行胰胆管造影术(ERCP)安全性的研究报告称,术后出血风险增加。我们研究了长期透析的 ESRD 患者行 ERCP 治疗胆总管结石的安全性和疗效。

方法

回顾性分析了 2000 年 1 月至 2018 年 2 月期间因胆总管结石而行 ERCP 的 3466 例患者。患者分为透析组和非透析组,并采用倾向评分匹配法以尽量减少选择偏倚。

结果

在倾向评分匹配后比较了透析组(n=39)和非透析组(n=78)的患者。在透析组的 39 例患者中,28 例(71.8%)患者使用血液透析进行肾脏替代治疗,而 11 例(28.2%)患者接受腹膜透析。透析的中位时间为 8 年(范围 1-24 年)。两组 ERCP 总体成功率无差异。透析组和非透析组术后并发症总体发生率分别为 28.2%和 15.4%(p=0.100)。透析组术后出血发生率高于非透析组(23.1%比 5.1%,p=0.004)。所有与操作相关的出血均通过内镜治疗成功控制。两组术后胰腺炎、感染和穿孔的发生率无显著差异(p>0.05)。

结论

完全胆管清除的总体成功率在透析组和非透析组之间无差异。长期透析的 ESRD 患者术后出血风险似乎增加。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验