Mendes Joana, Mendes José Manuel, Barreiros Pedro, Aroso Carlos, Silva António Sérgio
UNIPRO-Oral Pathology and Rehabilitation Research Unit, University Institute of Health Sciences (IUCS), CESPU, 4585-116 Gandra, Portugal.
Polymers (Basel). 2022 Apr 26;14(9):1749. doi: 10.3390/polym14091749.
(1) Introduction: Denture adhesives (DAs) promote stability, chewing ability, and quality of life. The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of original brand DAs and white brands in their retention of conventional complete dentures. (2) Methods: This study followed the recommendations of the international standard ISO 10873. Three original brands of DA (Corega® Fixação 3D, GlaxoSmithKline®, Stafford Miller Ltd., Dungarvan Co. Waterford, Ireland), KuKident® Pro Procter & Gamble Technical Centres®, Ltd., Whitehal Lane, Germany and Elgydium® Fix, Laboratórios URGO® SL, Florida, Spain) were compared to three white brands (Fixação Extra Forte Pingo Doce®, Laboratórios Cosmodent®, Cantabria, Spain), Fixador de Próteses (Continente®, Propack®,Gmbh, Ladenburg, Germany) and Creme Fixador de Próteses (Auchan®, Ellipse®, Roubaix, France). Their retention capacities were analyzed using a mechanical test device. (3) Results: The mean retentive ability of original brand adhesives (M = 11.16, SD = 5.27) was significantly higher (t(298) = 11.88; p < 0.001) than that of the white brands (M = 5.92, SD = 1.18). When comparing all brands, statistically significant differences were also observed, F(5.294) = 707.68 (p < 0.001). The generic adhesive results were more homogeneous. The generic brands from Continente® (M = 5.24, SD = 0.94) and Auchan® (M = 5.80, SD = 0.79) were not significantly different, while the Pingo Doce® brand obtained significantly higher mean retention results (M = 6.71, SD = 1.28). (4) Conclusions: The original brands of DA have a significantly higher retentive ability than the white brands. Elygidim® Fix had the worst result of the three original brands, and the product from Pingo Doce® had the best result among the three white brands.
(1) 引言：义齿黏附剂（DAs）可提升稳定性、咀嚼能力及生活质量。本研究的目的是比较原装品牌义齿黏附剂和白色品牌义齿黏附剂对传统全口义齿的固位效果。(2) 方法：本研究遵循国际标准ISO 10873的建议。将三种原装品牌的义齿黏附剂（Corega® Fixação 3D，葛兰素史克公司，Stafford Miller Ltd.，爱尔兰沃特福德郡邓加文）、KuKident® Pro 宝洁技术中心有限公司，德国怀特哈尔巷）和Elgydium® Fix，URGO® SL实验室，西班牙佛罗里达）与三种白色品牌（Fixação Extra Forte Pingo Doce®，Cosmodent®实验室，西班牙坎塔布里亚）、义齿固定剂（Continente®，Propack®，Gmbh，德国拉登堡）和义齿黏固剂乳膏（Auchan®，Ellipse®，法国鲁贝）进行比较。使用机械测试装置分析它们的固位能力。(3) 结果：原装品牌黏附剂的平均固位能力（M = 11.16，SD = 5.27）显著高于白色品牌（M = 5.92，SD = 1.18），t(298) = 11.88；p < 0.001）。在比较所有品牌时，也观察到了统计学上的显著差异，F(5.294) = 707.68（p < 0.001）。通用黏附剂的结果更为均匀。Continente®（M = 5.24，SD = 0.94）和Auchan®（M = 5.80，SD = 0.79）的通用品牌没有显著差异，而Pingo Doce®品牌获得了显著更高的平均固位结果（M = 6.71，SD = 1.28）。(4) 结论：义齿黏附剂的原装品牌比白色品牌具有显著更高的固位能力。Elygidim® Fix在三个原装品牌中效果最差，而Pingo Doce®的产品在三个白色品牌中效果最佳。
