• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Evidence for optimal HIV testing intervals in HIV-negative individuals from various risk groups: a systematic review protocol.不同风险组的HIV阴性个体最佳HIV检测间隔的证据:一项系统评价方案
Can Commun Dis Rep. 2017 Feb 2;43(2):38-48. doi: 10.14745/ccdr.v43i02a02.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
4
Evidence for optimal HIV screening and testing intervals in HIV-negative individuals from various risk groups: A systematic review.不同风险组HIV阴性个体的最佳HIV筛查和检测间隔的证据:一项系统评价。
Can Commun Dis Rep. 2018 Dec 6;44(12):337-347. doi: 10.14745/ccdr.v44i12a05.
5
Chest Computed Tomography for the Diagnosis of COVID-19 in Emergency Trauma Surgery Patients Who Require Urgent Care During the Pandemic: Protocol for an Umbrella Review.胸部计算机断层扫描在大流行期间需要紧急护理的急诊创伤手术患者中诊断COVID-19:一项伞状综述方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 May 6;10(5):e25207. doi: 10.2196/25207.
6
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
7
Rapid antigen detection and molecular tests for group A streptococcal infections for acute sore throat: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.用于急性咽痛的 A 组链球菌感染的快速抗原检测和分子检测:系统评价和经济评估。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Jun;24(31):1-232. doi: 10.3310/hta24310.
8
9
Rates and risk factors for suicidal ideation, suicide attempts and suicide deaths in persons with HIV: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.艾滋病毒感染者自杀意念、自杀未遂和自杀死亡的发生率及风险因素:一项系统评价和荟萃分析方案
BMJ Open. 2021 Feb 5;11(2):e037154. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-037154.
10
Evaluating characteristics of PROSPERO records as predictors of eventual publication of non-Cochrane systematic reviews: a meta-epidemiological study protocol.评价 PROSPERO 记录特征对非 Cochrane 系统评价最终发表的预测作用:一项meta 流行病学研究方案。
Syst Rev. 2018 Mar 9;7(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s13643-018-0709-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Evidence for optimal HIV screening and testing intervals in HIV-negative individuals from various risk groups: A systematic review.不同风险组HIV阴性个体的最佳HIV筛查和检测间隔的证据:一项系统评价。
Can Commun Dis Rep. 2018 Dec 6;44(12):337-347. doi: 10.14745/ccdr.v44i12a05.

本文引用的文献

1
Canadian and international recommendations on the frequency of HIV screening and testing: A systematic review.加拿大及国际上关于艾滋病毒筛查和检测频率的建议:一项系统综述。
Can Commun Dis Rep. 2016 Aug 4;42(8):161-168. doi: 10.14745/ccdr.v42i08a03.
2
HIV in Canada: 2009 to 2014.加拿大的艾滋病病毒:2009年至2014年。
Can Commun Dis Rep. 2015 Dec 3;41(12):292-303. doi: 10.14745/ccdr.v41i12a01.
3
Initiation of Antiretroviral Therapy in Early Asymptomatic HIV Infection.早期无症状HIV感染中抗逆转录病毒治疗的启动
N Engl J Med. 2015 Aug 27;373(9):795-807. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1506816. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
4
Human immunodeficiency virus transmission at each step of the care continuum in the United States.美国关爱连续体各环节中的人类免疫缺陷病毒传播。
JAMA Intern Med. 2015 Apr;175(4):588-96. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.8180.
5
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation.系统评价和荟萃分析议定书的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015:详细说明和解释。
BMJ. 2015 Jan 2;350:g7647. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g7647.
6
Antiretroviral therapy for the prevention of HIV transmission: what will it take?抗逆转录病毒疗法用于预防HIV传播:需要具备哪些条件?
Clin Infect Dis. 2014 Apr;58(7):1003-11. doi: 10.1093/cid/ciu018. Epub 2014 Jan 14.
7
Antiretroviral therapy for prevention is a combination strategy.抗逆转录病毒疗法预防是一种联合策略。
Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2013 Jun;10(2):152-8. doi: 10.1007/s11904-013-0152-1.
8
GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence--publication bias.GRADE 指南:5. 评估证据质量——发表偏倚。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Dec;64(12):1277-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.01.011. Epub 2011 Jul 30.
9
Prevention of HIV-1 infection with early antiretroviral therapy.早期抗逆转录病毒疗法预防 HIV-1 感染。
N Engl J Med. 2011 Aug 11;365(6):493-505. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1105243. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
10
Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research.系统评价研究质量评估:Cochrane 协作风险偏倚工具与有效公共卫生实践项目质量评估工具的比较:方法学研究。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2012 Feb;18(1):12-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2010.01516.x. Epub 2010 Aug 4.

不同风险组的HIV阴性个体最佳HIV检测间隔的证据:一项系统评价方案

Evidence for optimal HIV testing intervals in HIV-negative individuals from various risk groups: a systematic review protocol.

作者信息

Traversy G P, Austin T, Yau J, Timmerman K

机构信息

Centre for Communicable Diseases and Infection Control, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON.

出版信息

Can Commun Dis Rep. 2017 Feb 2;43(2):38-48. doi: 10.14745/ccdr.v43i02a02.

DOI:10.14745/ccdr.v43i02a02
PMID:29770063
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC5757700/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Evidence-based recommendations for HIV testing are essential for health care providers. However, it is unclear whether there is sufficient evidence to support recommendations for HIV testing frequencies in a variety of HIV risk groups.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this document is to outline the methodological protocol of a systematic review that would gather evidence for the optimal frequency of HIV testing among individuals in various HIV risk groups with respect to personal and public health outcomes and cost-effectiveness.

METHODS

This protocol adheres to the PRISMA-P reporting items, and the review is registered with PROSPERO. The target population includes individuals who may have undiagnosed HIV infection. Different frequencies of HIV testing will be compared and outcomes to do with personal and public health, patient values/preferences and costs will be examined. The search strategy will encompass searches in MEDLINE/Pubmed, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane, PsychINFO, and EconLit, as well as grey literature sources. Articles will be screened by title/abstract, and subsequently by full-text, in duplicate. Extraction of pertinent data from the screened references will be carried out by one reviewer and verified by a second. Multiple critical appraisal tools will be used to assess individual study quality, and the GRADE approach will be used to appraise the overall quality of the evidence. Data will be synthesized narratively, and the results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal.

DISCUSSION

This systematic review, designed with extensive input from content experts, will help to identify key evidence to inform recommendations for HIV testing frequency.

摘要

背景

基于证据的HIV检测建议对医疗保健提供者至关重要。然而,目前尚不清楚是否有足够的证据支持针对各种HIV风险群体的HIV检测频率建议。

目的

本文档的目的是概述一项系统评价的方法方案,该评价将收集关于不同HIV风险群体个体的HIV检测最佳频率的证据,涉及个人和公共卫生结果以及成本效益。

方法

本方案遵循PRISMA-P报告项目,该评价已在PROSPERO注册。目标人群包括可能未被诊断出感染HIV的个体。将比较不同频率的HIV检测,并考察与个人和公共卫生、患者价值观/偏好以及成本相关的结果。检索策略将包括在MEDLINE/Pubmed、Scopus、Embase、Cochrane、PsychINFO和EconLit以及灰色文献来源中进行检索。文章将首先通过标题/摘要进行筛选,随后进行全文筛选,均为双人重复筛选。由一名审阅者从筛选出的参考文献中提取相关数据,并由另一名审阅者进行核实。将使用多种关键评价工具来评估个体研究质量,并用GRADE方法来评价证据的整体质量。数据将进行叙述性综合分析,结果将发表在同行评审期刊上。

讨论

这项系统评价在内容专家的广泛参与下设计而成,将有助于识别关键证据,为HIV检测频率的建议提供依据。