• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胸部计算机断层扫描在大流行期间需要紧急护理的急诊创伤手术患者中诊断COVID-19:一项伞状综述方案

Chest Computed Tomography for the Diagnosis of COVID-19 in Emergency Trauma Surgery Patients Who Require Urgent Care During the Pandemic: Protocol for an Umbrella Review.

作者信息

Griswold Dylan, Gempeler Andrés, Rosseau Gail, Kaseje Neema, Johnson Walter D, Kolias Angelos, Hutchinson Peter J, Rubiano Andres M

机构信息

National Institute of Health Research Global Health Research Group on Neurotrauma, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Addenbrooke's Hospital, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom.

出版信息

JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 May 6;10(5):e25207. doi: 10.2196/25207.

DOI:10.2196/25207
PMID:33878019
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8104001/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Many health care facilities in low- and middle-income countries are inadequately resourced. COVID-19 has the potential to decimate surgical health care services unless health systems take stringent measures to protect health care workers from viral exposure and ensure the continuity of specialized care for patients. Among these measures, the timely diagnosis of COVID-19 is paramount to ensure the use of protective measures and isolation of patients to prevent transmission to health care personnel caring for patients with an unknown COVID-19 status or contact during the pandemic. Besides molecular and antibody tests, chest computed tomography (CT) has been assessed as a potential tool to aid in the screening or diagnosis of COVID-19 and could be valuable in the emergency care setting.

OBJECTIVE

This paper presents the protocol for an umbrella review that aims to identify and summarize the available literature on the diagnostic accuracy of chest CT for COVID-19 in trauma surgery patients requiring urgent care. The objective is to inform future recommendations on emergency care for this category of patients.

METHODS

We will conduct several searches in the L·OVE (Living Overview of Evidence) platform for COVID-19, a system that performs automated regular searches in PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and over 30 other sources. The search results will be presented according to PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis). This review will preferentially consider systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy studies, as well as individual studies of such design, if not included in the systematic reviews, that assessed the sensitivity and specificity of chest CT in emergency trauma surgery patients. Critical appraisal of the included studies for risk of bias will be conducted. Data will be extracted using a standardized data extraction tool. Findings will be summarized narratively, and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach will be used to grade the certainty of evidence.

RESULTS

Ethics approval is not required for this systematic review, as there will be no patient involvement. The search for this systematic review commenced in October 2020, and we expect to publish the findings in early 2021. The plan for dissemination is to publish the findings in a peer-reviewed journal and present our results at conferences that engage the most pertinent stakeholders.

CONCLUSIONS

During the COVID-19 pandemic, protecting health care workers from infection is essential. Up-to-date information on the efficacy of diagnostic tests for detecting COVID-19 is essential. This review will serve an important role as a thorough summary to inform evidence-based recommendations on establishing effective policy and clinical guideline recommendations.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

PROSPERO International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews CRD42020198267; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=198267.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/25207.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3870/8104001/7c08ff2a7720/resprot_v10i5e25207_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3870/8104001/7c08ff2a7720/resprot_v10i5e25207_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3870/8104001/7c08ff2a7720/resprot_v10i5e25207_fig1.jpg
摘要

背景

低收入和中等收入国家的许多医疗保健机构资源不足。除非卫生系统采取严格措施保护医护人员免受病毒感染,并确保为患者提供专科护理的连续性,否则新冠疫情有可能使外科医疗服务遭受重创。在这些措施中,及时诊断新冠病毒对于确保采取防护措施以及隔离患者以防止病毒传播给在疫情期间护理新冠病毒感染状况不明或有接触史患者的医护人员至关重要。除了分子检测和抗体检测外,胸部计算机断层扫描(CT)已被评估为辅助筛查或诊断新冠病毒的潜在工具,在急诊环境中可能具有重要价值。

目的

本文介绍了一项伞状综述的方案,旨在识别和总结关于胸部CT对需要紧急护理的创伤外科患者新冠病毒诊断准确性的现有文献。目的是为这一类患者的未来急诊护理建议提供依据。

方法

我们将在L·OVE(循证实时综述)平台上针对新冠病毒进行多次检索,该系统会在PubMed、Embase、Cochrane对照试验中心注册库以及其他30多个来源进行自动定期检索。检索结果将按照PRISMA(系统综述和Meta分析的首选报告项目)呈现。本综述将优先考虑诊断试验准确性研究的系统综述,以及此类设计的个别研究(若未包含在系统综述中),这些研究评估了胸部CT在急诊创伤外科患者中的敏感性和特异性。将对纳入研究的偏倚风险进行严格评估。将使用标准化数据提取工具提取数据。研究结果将进行叙述性总结,并采用推荐分级、评估、制定与评价(GRADE)方法对证据的确定性进行分级。

结果

由于本系统综述不涉及患者参与,因此无需伦理批准。本系统综述的检索于2020年10月开始,预计2021年初公布研究结果。传播计划是在同行评审期刊上发表研究结果,并在与最相关利益相关者相关的会议上展示我们的结果。

结论

在新冠疫情期间,保护医护人员免受感染至关重要。获取关于检测新冠病毒诊断试验有效性的最新信息至关重要。本综述将作为全面总结发挥重要作用,为制定有效政策和临床指南建议提供循证依据。

试验注册

PROSPERO国际前瞻性系统综述注册库CRD42020198267;https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=198267。

国际注册报告识别号(IRRID):PRR1-10.2196/25207。

相似文献

1
Chest Computed Tomography for the Diagnosis of COVID-19 in Emergency Trauma Surgery Patients Who Require Urgent Care During the Pandemic: Protocol for an Umbrella Review.胸部计算机断层扫描在大流行期间需要紧急护理的急诊创伤手术患者中诊断COVID-19:一项伞状综述方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 May 6;10(5):e25207. doi: 10.2196/25207.
2
Personal protective equipment for reducing the risk of COVID-19 infection among healthcare workers involved in emergency trauma surgery during the pandemic: an umbrella review protocol.疫情期间参与紧急创伤手术的医护人员降低 COVID-19 感染风险的个人防护设备:伞式综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Mar 2;11(3):e045598. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045598.
3
An Umbrella Review With Meta-Analysis of Chest Computed Tomography for Diagnosis of COVID-19: Considerations for Trauma Patient Management.一项关于胸部计算机断层扫描诊断COVID-19的荟萃分析伞状综述:创伤患者管理的考量
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jul 26;9:900721. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.900721. eCollection 2022.
4
A Metasynthesis and Meta-analysis of the Impact and Diagnostic Safety of COVID-19 Symptom Agnostic Rapid Testing in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Protocol for a Systematic Review.低收入和中等收入国家中新冠病毒症状无关快速检测的影响及诊断安全性的综合分析与荟萃分析:一项系统评价方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Jan 5;12:e41132. doi: 10.2196/41132.
5
Personal protective equipment for reducing the risk of COVID-19 infection among health care workers involved in emergency trauma surgery during the pandemic: An umbrella review.疫情期间参与紧急创伤手术的医护人员降低 COVID-19 感染风险的个人防护设备:伞式综述。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2021 Apr 1;90(4):e72-e80. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003073.
6
Effects of Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems Substitution on Body Weight Status: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.电子尼古丁传送系统替代对体重状况的影响:一项系统评价与荟萃分析方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Mar 26;13:e56324. doi: 10.2196/56324.
7
Risk factors for COVID-19 among healthcare workers. A protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis.医护人员中新型冠状病毒肺炎的危险因素。一项系统评价与荟萃分析方案。
PLoS One. 2021 May 4;16(5):e0250958. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0250958. eCollection 2021.
8
Digital Education for the Management of Chronic Wounds in Health Care Professionals: Protocol for a Systematic Review by the Digital Health Education Collaboration.医疗保健专业人员慢性伤口管理的数字教育:数字健康教育合作组织的系统评价方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Mar 25;8(3):e12488. doi: 10.2196/12488.
9
Policies and Management Interventions to Enhance Health and Care Workforce Capacity for Addressing the COVID-19 Pandemic: Protocol for a Living Systematic Review.加强卫生和护理劳动力应对新冠疫情能力的政策与管理干预措施:一项动态系统评价方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Oct 5;12:e50306. doi: 10.2196/50306.
10
The Effects of Antenatal Interventions on Gestational Weight Gain in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Protocol for a Systematic Review.低收入和中等收入国家产前干预对孕期体重增加的影响:系统评价方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2023 Nov 8;12:e48234. doi: 10.2196/48234.

引用本文的文献

1
Do COVID-19 CT features vary between patients from within and outside mainland China? Findings from a meta-analysis.中国内地与境外 COVID-19 患者的 CT 特征是否存在差异?一项荟萃分析的结果。
Front Public Health. 2022 Oct 14;10:939095. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.939095. eCollection 2022.
2
An Umbrella Review With Meta-Analysis of Chest Computed Tomography for Diagnosis of COVID-19: Considerations for Trauma Patient Management.一项关于胸部计算机断层扫描诊断COVID-19的荟萃分析伞状综述:创伤患者管理的考量
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Jul 26;9:900721. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.900721. eCollection 2022.
3
International Neurotrauma Training Based on North-South Collaborations: Results of an Inter-institutional Program in the Era of Global Neurosurgery.

本文引用的文献

1
Clinical characteristics of 3062 COVID-19 patients: A meta-analysis.3062 例 COVID-19 患者的临床特征:一项荟萃分析。
J Med Virol. 2020 Oct;92(10):1902-1914. doi: 10.1002/jmv.25884. Epub 2020 Jun 24.
2
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials.《随机对照试验偏倚风险评估工具2:修订版》
BMJ. 2019 Aug 28;366:l4898. doi: 10.1136/bmj.l4898.
3
AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both.AMSTAR 2:一种用于系统评价的关键评估工具,该系统评价包括医疗保健干预措施的随机或非随机研究,或两者皆有。
基于南北合作的国际神经创伤培训:全球神经外科时代一项机构间项目的成果
Front Surg. 2021 Jul 29;8:633774. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2021.633774. eCollection 2021.
BMJ. 2017 Sep 21;358:j4008. doi: 10.1136/bmj.j4008.
4
ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions.ROBINS-I:一种评估干预性非随机研究偏倚风险的工具。
BMJ. 2016 Oct 12;355:i4919. doi: 10.1136/bmj.i4919.
5
Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement.系统评价与Meta分析方案的首选报告项目(PRISMA-P)2015声明。
Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 1;4(1):1. doi: 10.1186/2046-4053-4-1.
6
GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables.GRADE 指南:1. 简介-GRADE 证据概况和发现摘要表。
J Clin Epidemiol. 2011 Apr;64(4):383-94. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026. Epub 2010 Dec 31.
7
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.系统评价与Meta分析的首选报告项目:PRISMA声明
Int J Surg. 2010;8(5):336-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2010.02.007. Epub 2010 Feb 18.
8
Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.证据质量分级与推荐强度
BMJ. 2004 Jun 19;328(7454):1490. doi: 10.1136/bmj.328.7454.1490.
9
Prehospital Index: a scoring system for field triage of trauma victims.院前指数:一种用于创伤受害者现场分诊的评分系统。
Ann Emerg Med. 1986 Feb;15(2):178-82. doi: 10.1016/s0196-0644(86)80016-6.